At first, Missouri Quarterback Blaine Gabbert was the darling of the NFL Draft, with draft analysts from Mike Mayock at the NFL Network to the legendary Mel Kiper at ESPN singing the Mizzou signal caller's praises, even though he didn't win a single 2010 award of note, wasn't in the Heisman Trophy consideration contest, lost a bowl game, and didn't throw at the NFL Combine.
What Blaine Gabbert had and has going for him since January of this year is CAA Football's Tom Condon as his agent; a man described by some media types as "powerful" without explaining how that is. That "power" may have had something to do with all of the positive PR buzz surrounding Gabbert in the months since he hired Condon, especially a very slanted and frankly racist USA Today special focusing on 2010 Heisman Trophy winner Cam Newton vs. Blaine Gabbert.
That article, which this blogger picked apart, featured Mel Kiper and USA Today's Jim Corbett inexplicably comparing Newton to other black quarterbacks as far back as 1999 without explaining why, or saying "Hey, these guys are black," making it look like "dog whistle" racism.
But now, in the wake of this bloggers post, which was picked up by Black Athlete, and caused Pro Football Talk to specifically mention that Gabbert got involved in a bar fight last year, something not widely reported before, Kiper's officially off the Gabbert Bandwagon.
In an interview with Sports Illustrated's Peter King, Kiper said:
That was different from Kiper's earlier comments on Gabbert, where he had the QB going number one to the Carolina Panthers as recently as March of this year.
As a note, this blogger has nothing against Blaine Gabbert, but something against pumping him up just to counter the chance that Cam Newton will be picked by the Panthers, and something against the media bowing down to his agent without explanation. (Moreover, Gabbert should be careful how he uses Twitter, and his use of the term "IDIOT" in a tweet was not smart.) First, taking a quarterback from this class (or any class) that high is not the best expenditure of money. Second, it's a reflection of how little confidence NFL teams seem to have in their ability to coach the passing game to a new quarterback, such that the QB can start immediately - even though the NFL is a throwing league. If the confidence was there, the feeling would be 'We can coach anyone to be a good quarterback,' but that's not the case.
The logical choice for the Panthers in the 2011 NFL Draft is to take one of the defensive tackles number one, or trade down.
Stay tuned.
What Blaine Gabbert had and has going for him since January of this year is CAA Football's Tom Condon as his agent; a man described by some media types as "powerful" without explaining how that is. That "power" may have had something to do with all of the positive PR buzz surrounding Gabbert in the months since he hired Condon, especially a very slanted and frankly racist USA Today special focusing on 2010 Heisman Trophy winner Cam Newton vs. Blaine Gabbert.
That article, which this blogger picked apart, featured Mel Kiper and USA Today's Jim Corbett inexplicably comparing Newton to other black quarterbacks as far back as 1999 without explaining why, or saying "Hey, these guys are black," making it look like "dog whistle" racism.
But now, in the wake of this bloggers post, which was picked up by Black Athlete, and caused Pro Football Talk to specifically mention that Gabbert got involved in a bar fight last year, something not widely reported before, Kiper's officially off the Gabbert Bandwagon.
In an interview with Sports Illustrated's Peter King, Kiper said:
Blaine Gabbert. Lotta people comparing him to Drew Bledsoe coming out, but I don't see it. I'm not buying into Gabbert. I know he runs a 4.65 at 6-5 and 235, and I give him credit for doing it with a poor receiving corps, but I think he's shaky. You realize he completed only 38 percent of his throws 15 yards [and farther] downfield? And he was only 44 percent on third down, with six touchdowns and five interceptions? You know what Andrew Luck was on third down last year? Seventy-one percent. [Gabbert will] go in the top five, but I've got him down past 10 -- not exactly sure where right now. Still finalizing that. But he and Newton will be around 12, 13 for me.
That was different from Kiper's earlier comments on Gabbert, where he had the QB going number one to the Carolina Panthers as recently as March of this year.
As a note, this blogger has nothing against Blaine Gabbert, but something against pumping him up just to counter the chance that Cam Newton will be picked by the Panthers, and something against the media bowing down to his agent without explanation. (Moreover, Gabbert should be careful how he uses Twitter, and his use of the term "IDIOT" in a tweet was not smart.) First, taking a quarterback from this class (or any class) that high is not the best expenditure of money. Second, it's a reflection of how little confidence NFL teams seem to have in their ability to coach the passing game to a new quarterback, such that the QB can start immediately - even though the NFL is a throwing league. If the confidence was there, the feeling would be 'We can coach anyone to be a good quarterback,' but that's not the case.
The logical choice for the Panthers in the 2011 NFL Draft is to take one of the defensive tackles number one, or trade down.
Stay tuned.
No comments:
Post a Comment