Google - Eric Schmidt On The YouTube Deal - Ft.com

This Financial Times article really sheds good light on Google's thinking behind the acquisition of YouTube.

View from the top: Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google

Published: October 12 2006 23:47 | Last updated: October 13 2006 02:25

CEOs review the news on video on FT.com

This week: Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google.

ADVERTISEMENT

FINANCIAL TIMES: Clearly, the dominant business news event this week is your own acquisition of YouTube. Why is user-generated video worth $1.65bn to Google?

ERIC SCHMIDT: Well, on the money side, it’s easy because we have what we think is the world’s best advertising system and we can take that advertising and use that over time to build quite a business off all of the things the users are doing on YouTube. The real reason, however, was not the money, and not even the advertising, it was because we believe that video is going to be, and is sort of already, one of the most important new media types on the internet.

More and more people are going to be doing videos of one kind or another to communicate ideas, sell their product, record their memories, and ultimately a lot of the existing broadcast world that we’re so used to will become available on the internet.

FT: Since doing that deal, you’ve been quite assiduous in going and visiting some of your other big media partners and talked to them about the significance. Has it made them again ask this question that we’ve heard a lot about Google ‘friend or foe?’ and worry about Google moving into content creation.

SCHMIDT: We, of course, want to be their friend. We don’t want it to be Google foe. We see ourselves as a technology provider and a distribution network. We’re not in the content business. And the partnerships that we’ve constructed over the last few years, and especially the ones over the summer, really show the application of our advertising network to the content and media capabilities of our partners. So we want those media partners to put their media content, literally their content, into this emergent new and much larger system as a result of the YouTube acquisition.

FT: You’ve met with some of them already. You’ve met with News Corp executives, you’re in New York, meeting maybe with people maybe from Time Warner. Are they comfortable with that explanation?

SCHMIDT: All of the media companies are dealing with dramatic changes in their business. All of them are looking for a partner. All of them are looking for a way to make money. One of the great news, from our perspective, is people are using this content on the internet. The bad news is it doesn’t make as much money for the businesses. And ultimately the businesses need to make money in order to produce the new content. So what we’re trying to do with all of these partners is to say, ‘if you work with us we can combine our advertising platform and your content with a much larger audience.’ So far people like that message, they are now trying to figure out what to do about it – should they, should they not, under what terms, and those sort of things.

FT: Another new generation internet property which has generated a lot of interest recently is Facebook. Are you thinking about acquiring Facebook? Do you think Yahoo might acquire them?

SCHMIDT: I shouldn’t speculate on mergers and acquisitions either our own possibilities, or competitors’. It’s clear to me that social networks are going to grow and grow quickly. We did a very, very significant deal with MySpace, which we’re very proud of. We think it’s the defining economic deal in that space.

FT: Your acquisition speaks to the tremendous technological change which we’re still really at the beginning of. Are there going to be victims? And which companies might be those victims.

SCHMIDT: You know, every technology dislocation has winners and losers. And the winners are the companies that can adopt these technologies more quickly and the losers are the ones that are stuck, unable to make the transition, unable to take advantage of new technologies. It is clear that the internet and the web and what is generally known as a marketing term of web 2.0 are the defining new technologies. I think that race is underfoot. It’s too early to say who the losers will be. Clearly the winners will include companies like Google and all the other companies that have made their bets on web 2.0.

FT: More broadly, Silicon Valley has been roiled by corporate governance controversies recently. There have been the pre-texting issues at Hewlett-Packard, the backdated stock options issues which have claimed some very senior, long-standing leaders in the technology industry. What kind of an impact is that having on innovation, on people running public companies like yourselves now?

SCHMIDT: It makes people be more careful and I don’t think that’s necessarily a bad thing. Certainly, some of the standards in the past may not have been as tight. Some of this may be revisionist looking back. Certainly the pre-texting was not appropriate because it was a violation of privacy. I think all of that is a sideshow relative to the innovation in the Valley, which is fundamentally created by small teams of people who see the world in a different way. And I don’t see these crisises, these scandals and so forth, as fundamentally changing that.

The story of the Valley is still the same. It’s about small teams doing amazing things with limited resources, often with venture capitalists, creating great companies.

FT: You talk about the innovative tradition of the Valley. More generally there has been a lot of questioning in America right now, about this country’s ability to maintain its competitive advantage in a globalised world with lots of cheap programming talent in other developing countries. Is the Valley still competitive?

SCHMIDT: The Valley is certainly competitive. It would be a lot more competitive if our government would start doing rational things like letting the smartest people in the world come into the United States on H1 visas rather than preventing them from doing so. So a small number of changes from the government, including increasing the funding in basic research and development around computer science and science in general and also trying to make sure the United States remains an attractive place for the best and the brightest. The compound value of that, the innovations and the companies that these, essentially, immigrants create, is a part of the American story.

FT: You made a big impact in Europe recently addressing the Tory party conference. Why did you choose to do that and what kind of a message do you think an innovative American company, like Google, has for Europe? For Britain?

SCHMIDT: It’s interesting that in Britain, of all the European countries, the United Kingdom is one of the best examples of innovation. If you look at the creation of the Cambridge technology centres, all around the research centres that were formed there, the transformation that’s gone on in British society over the last 10-15 years, encouraging innovation, encouraging new capital formation, it’s really an icon for the rest of Europe. And I think that’s wonderful.

My message was a message of optimism. My message was that technology, we’re just at the beginning, and I was not particularly trying to make a partisan comment. Google is certainly not political. And the messages that I gave, and I happened to be invited to [I guess] the conservatives’ party, but I would have given the same speech to any of the other parties and, in fact in any of the other European countries.

The important message is a message of innovation - that if you unleash the human capital that is present in Europe you will get tremendous economic returns for those countries. And that’s the story of America. It’s a story that’s well replicable in Europe.

FT: Thank you very much.

SCHMIDT: Thanks.

FT: And now the prediction.

SCHMIDT: You know there’s a whole new phenomenon. Young people online all the time, communicating in new ways and building new social environments. New enviroments, new friends, new ways in which they interact. All of us will be affected by this in ways I could not possibly predict. Political. Social. Community. New businesses. It’s amazing to watch this next generation spend their time online and change the world.

Oakland Tribune's Monte Poole Calls For 49ers Defensive Coordinator Billy Davis To Be Fired

Monte's column also reveals how terrible Head Coach Mike Nolan's management style is, where the players -- who have to execute the schemes -- are not consulted.

49ers coach Davis has to go
Column by Monte Poole - OAKLAND TRIBUNE

Article Last Updated:10/16/2006 05:17:26 AM PDT

SAN FRANCISCO — If Mike Nolan is as perceptive as he would like us to believe, he will begin his team's bye week by at least considering waving bye-bye to one of his assistants.

Otherwise, the next team the 49ers see might run up 50. Before halftime.

As it was, the San Diego Chargers marched into Candlestick Point on Sunday afternoon and scored 35 points in the first half en route to a 48-19 spanking of the 49ers.

Though it was accepted that the Chargers were the vastly superior team, the 49ers filed out of the stadium acutely aware of their most visible weakness.

Their defense is a mess. Preparation seems to be poor. Assignments often are blown. Problems exist from top to bottom, in all the margins and creases. The pass rush is inconsistent, the linebackers are a step slow, and the cornerbacks can't cover a turtle with a tarp.

More to the point, the defensive coordinator Billy Davis — who drifts between the 4-3 scheme and the 3-4 scheme — not only has been incapable of masking these deficiencies but also seems to find ways to accentuate them.

Consider, please, San Diego's sixth offensive play. Tight end Antonio Gates, arguably the best in the NFL, left the huddle and split wide left. Across from Gates was a man named T. J. Slaughter, listed as a linebacker but more accurately described as a special teams player.

This is what one might call a mismatch.

"I saw that they had a linebacker out there on him, and I thought to myself, 'Could that be?'" Chargers quarterback Philip Rivers said, resisting the urge to giggle.

Rivers' reaction was echoed by educated observers throughout the stadium. Yet this was the hand Davis played.

The hand got burned. Rivers, in the early stages of his first 300-yard game, fired a dart to Gates, who shrugged off Slaughter and chugged in for a 57-yard touchdown, giving San Diego a 7-0 lead three minutes into the game.

It was at that point the 49ers defensive unit began its regression in earnest. The Chargers' next drive went 91 yards for a touchdown. The third ended when Rivers exploited the matchup between massive wideout Vincent Jackson (6-foot-5, 241) and rookie safety Marcus Hudson for a 33-yard touchdown pass.

"(Rivers') offensive coordinator told him to come after me," said Hudson, who attended North Carolina State with Rivers and spoke to the quarterback after the game.

While San Francisco's playing personnel leaves a lot to be desired, with an urgent need for upgrades in the secondary, Davis also is proving himself profoundly replaceable.

One alternative to be considered should be current assistant head coach Mike Singletary.

Asked if the upcoming bye week might be a good time to destroy and rebuilt his defense, Nolan paused a few moments.

"That's a good way to put it," the coach conceded. "All I can say is, maybe, yeah. We will see.

"The guys are busting their tails. They are working hard. As much as I know some of our shortcomings going into it, I know that when you play well as a unit you can play better than we have a couple times. And that's the disappointing thing."

What Nolan, himself a former defensive coordinator, did not express was the tiniest bit of confidence in Davis.

Then again, how could he? The 49ers have allowed 34 points to Arizona, 38 to Philadelphia, 41 to Kansas City and, now, 48 to San Diego. Moreover, the Niners have allowed a league-high 130 first-half points, indicating they don't exactly leave the locker room as a single-file line of well-prepared predators.

"We're about where we were last year at this time," Nolan said.

It was only two weeks ago, after the 41-0 mashing in Kansas City, that Nolan brushed off an Internet report saying he would fire Davis — if not immediately, at the end of the season.

I gave several 49ers defensive veterans an opportunity to defend their embattled leader. None did.

"They don't ask for players' input," said tackle Bryant Young, the most tenured member of the team. "Until they do, I don't want to say anything. I'd rather not get myself in trouble with anybody."

In other words, the 13-year vet chose to let the results linger like a cloud of sulfur.

The Chargers had 11 possessions, only one of which ended with a punt. They controlled the clock and took cheerful advantage of the charity offered by San Francisco's defense.

Nolan heard the tone of the postgame questions. He read the room. He searched for something positive to say about his team.

"Our offense ... is making a lot of progress," he said. "And we need to make that same progress on the other side of the ball."
Said Young: "Whatever we have to do, we have to do it fast."

San Francisco has two weeks to retool. Then comes a trip to Chicago, where the shockingly impressive Bears await. If the 49ers hit Soldier Field with the same cast of characters wearing helmets and headsets, cover your eyes.

Oakland Raiders Suspend WR Jerry Porter For Four Games - ESPN

This isn't an Art Shell move, it's an Al Davis move and it stinks. More on this later.

Raiders' Porter suspended four games
ESPN.com news services

ALAMEDA, Calif. -- The Oakland Raiders suspended disgruntled wide receiver Jerry Porter for four games without pay Saturday for conduct detrimental to the team.

Porter, when contacted by ESPN for a response, offered a "no comment."

The suspension, which will likely be appealed by the union, would cost Porter slightly over $235,000 in salary. Sources said Porter was informed of the decision on Friday.

Porter, Oakland's leading receiver a year ago, was inactive for the first four games of the season after clashing with new coach Art Shell and making public a trade demand at the start of training camp. The Raiders granted Porter and his agent, Joel Segal, permission to seek a trade.

"It's crazy," Porter said of his situation earlier this week. "I pretty much stay quiet and do what I'm asked. What am I supposed to do? I'm playing the cards the way they're dealt to me."

The Raiders were traveling to Denver on Saturday for Sunday night's game against the Broncos and unavailable for comment on the decision to suspend Porter.

Porter has been working with the scout team in practice, falling behind unheralded receivers Alvis Whitted and Johnnie Morant on the depth chart as Oakland opened the season 0-4. Whitted, who took Porter's spot in the starting lineup, has six catches for 70 yards, while Morant has no catches as the team's fourth receiver.

Porter has been on the sideline during the four losses to open the season, often seen joking around while the Raiders have struggled on offense without him.

Some players have questioned the decision to sit Porter while the team has struggled mightily on offense, but Shell has stuck to the decision. Shell has refused to elaborate on why Porter has been inactive.

"He's working. It's not that he's not working," Shell said earlier this week. "I've never said he hasn't worked. He's doing what he's asked to do and you can't ask for anything more than that."

Porter, in the second year of a five-year contract worth $20 million, had been hoping to be dealt before Tuesday's trade deadline.

Porter led the Raiders with 76 catches last season and had 942 yards receiving and five touchdown receptions in 2005.

Porter, a second-round pick out of West Virginia in 2000, has 239 catches for 3,215 yards and 24 touchdowns in six seasons with the Raiders. He has never reached 1,000 yards receiving in a season, missing the mark narrowly with 998 yards in 2004 and 942 last season.

Porter will be eligible to return from the suspension Nov. 12 when the Raiders host the Broncos.

Information from The Associated Press was used in this repo

Michelle Malkin's YouTube Video Banned By Community; She Cries About It

Michelle Malkin's a conservative columnist who I've always believed just became Republican to snag a white guy, and turned her initially personal scheme into this rather intense effort to make herself into a celebrity. She's succeeded.

(Now before you get after me, I'm going to explain that in my experience most of the time a woman said they're "Republican" it was followed by the person's expressed interest in someone white and male. Now there are exceptions to this, and I a good woman friend of mine is one of them, but she's almost the exception to the rule. I'm not writing that people who make the choice of party always do so for romantic reasons, but it's a factor. Now if you're a black single guy and Republican, does it mean you want to meet white chicks? I would say so, because you're certainly going to meet a lot of them. Plus, since being a minority of any kind hasn't been attractive to Republicans, why would anyone black, Asian or any other minority be so interested in the G.O.P. except... In Michelle's case, she's married, so I'll bet her choice of party came before her selection of mate.)

Now, she's gone a bit too far with her move into the vlogsphere using YouTube. A recent video she posted was banned. Now poor Michelle Malkin's pissed because she thinks the YouTube exec did it, when the community of users was responsible.

I think what Michelle Malkin's missing is that YouTubers generally don't like videos that express hate for a group of people, even if it's under the heading of "anti-terrorism." It's why this video Michelle Malkin hosts below wasn't flagged; it doesn't go as far as the first one.

Michelle Malkin, you're learning. It will take time, but you'll get the message.

Here's her rant:

Terrell Owens Upset About Not Getting Passes From Drew Bledsoe - Ft. Worth Star Telegram

Sources: Owens, Haley had shouting match

By CLARENCE E. HILL JR.
STAR-TELEGRAM STAFF WRITER

IRVING -- Cowboys receiver Terrell Owens said numerous times that he has learned from his past problems and wants to be a better player and better teammate in Dallas.

In that regard, Owens is having a slow start on and off the field.

Owens was late to practice on Wednesday and got into a shouting match with passing game coordinator Todd Haley, several sources said.

According to a source, Owens sent Haley a text message about the Cowboys not getting him the ball enough, which was a continuation of the his sideline rant Sunday when he caught three passes for 45 yards in a 38-24 loss at Philadelphia.

On Sunday, Owens repeatedly asked Haley: “Why did y’all bring me here?”

Owens didn’t back down while talking to the media on Wednesday when he questioned why the Cowboys weren’t doing enough to get him involved. It was that same day that he was late to practice and had the verbal confrontation with Haley, who, according to a source, pointed out his poor route running in the game and the number of passes the Cowboys threw his way.

Haley, known for his temper and who has tried to be patient with Owens, didn’t back down as both men asked the other not to disrespect them, a source said.

Assistant coaches are not allowed to talk to the media. Owens was unavailable for comment on Friday.

Curiously, a day after the Haley-Owens confrontation, Cowboys coach Bill Parcells declined to discuss Owens to the media. He continued the moratorium on Owens talk Friday.

In an interview with the Star-Telegram on Thursday, Cowboys owner Jerry Jones didn’t appear bothered by Owens’ complaints about being more involved.

“I think Terrell is looking for ways to helps us win and to get better,” Jones said. “Most competitors want the ball. That’s not a negative. I think that’s what the situation is going to be.”

Jones was most responsible for recruiting and signing Owens to a three-year, $25 million contract in March, despite his troubles with players and management in previous stops with the Eagles and San Francisco 49ers.

He said he had no problems with Owens’ openly questioning, “Why did y’all bring me here?”

“I just look at that as a heat of the battle after you had a disappointment type of situation,” Jones said.

Owens’ recent action won’t affect his status for Sunday’s game against the Houston Texans. He practiced with the first team on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday.

Owens has made the wrong kind of headlines with the Cowboys since training camp when he missed 21 practices with a strained hamstring. On Aug. 25, he missed a team meeting, a rehab session and was late for offensive meeting. He was subsequently fined $9,500.

He suffered a fractured hand in a Sept. 17 game against Washington. Ten days later, Owens was hospitalized after suffering an accidental overdose.

On the field, Owens has caught 17 passes for 232 yards and one touchdown. It’s his slowest start since 1999.

Arizona Cardinals Cornerback Antrel Rolle Fined 12,500 - ESPN.com

Rolle fined $12,500 for face-mask tackle of Johnson
By Len Pasquarelli
ESPN.com

Arizona Cardinals cornerback Antrel Rolle has been fined $12,500 by the league for a face mask infraction during his tackle of Larry Johnson in the fourth quarter of last Sunday's 23-20 loss to the Kansas City Chiefs.

The fine, first reported by Fox Sports, was confirmed on Friday by NFL officials.

It marks the second time this season that Rolle, the Cardinals' first-round choice in the 2005 draft, has been sanctioned for a hit deemed excessive by league officials.

Rolle was fined $5,000 for a so-called "horse-collar" tackle of Seattle Seahawks star running back Shaun Alexander in the teams' Sept. 17 meeting. Rolle was not penalized for that incident and was only fined after the league's officiating department reviewed the play for more than a week.

The incident last Sunday occurred with 2:31 remaining in the contest and the gamed tied 20-20. On a first-and-10 play from the Kansas City 13-yard line, Chiefs quarterback Damon Huard dumped a short pass to Johnson on the left side. The Chiefs' tailback rambled 78 yards, to the Arizona nine-yard line, before Rolle pulled him down from behind.

On the play, Rolle clearly grabbed Johnson's face mask, and failed to release it, even as the two players fell out of bounds.

Officials flagged Rolle for a major face mask foul. Because the play concluded at the Arizona nine-yard line, the infraction was half the distance to the goal line, making the penalty five yards instead of 15, and moving the ball to the Cardinals' four-yard line. Four plays later, Kansas City kicker Lawrence Tynes made a 19-yard field goal to win the game.

Johnson suffered a neck injury on the play and underwent a battery of tests earlier this week. The tests revealed no significant damage and, despite missing the first few days of practice this week, Johnson is now listed as "probable" for Sunday's game at Pittsburgh.

It is not yet known if Rolle, the eighth overall pick in the 2005 draft, will appeal the fine.

Len Pasquarelli is a senior NFL writer for ESPN.com. To check out Len's chat archive, click here .

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell on WBBM (Bears Radio) - NFL Media.com

Unlike Commissioner Tagliabue, Commissioner Goodell has made a large number of press interviews on the local radio of NFL teams, at lease every other week this season. This is the latest one. Goodell notes tha the Saints wil stay in New Orleans for the forceable future and the NFL will play internationally in the near future.

Commissioner Goodell on WBBM (Bears Radio)
Ron Gleason (Host), Jay Hilgenberg & Jim Schwantz (Former Bears)
Sunday, October 1, 2006

Gleason: We're joined now by the brand new commissioner of the NFL, Roger Goodell. First of all, congratulations on the job. What have you been doing the last month?

RG: Thanks, Ron. I've been going to a lot of football games, which is fun. It's great to be here in Chicago, particularly for a great game between two undefeated teams.

Gleason: You have kind of a tough act to follow. You've only had a couple commissioners over the past few decades. Pete Rozelle made things happen and Paul Tagliabue had tremendous success. Now where do you take it from here? Do we see the league expand some more? Do we see a team in LA? Do we see it going international? What should we expect over
the next few years?

RG: That's the great thing about my experience. I had the good fortune of working for the two greatest commissioners in sports: Pete Rozelle and Paul Tagliabue. That's the great thing about the NFL -- we've always found new and
innovative ways to bring more football to our fans. That's our mission: how do we get more football to our fans? I don't see expansion on the front burner right now, but I do see us playing more international games. I do see us finding new,
creative and innovative ways get more football through technology into our fans'hands.

Gleason: I understand there is a proposal that may come up in the next month or so about maybe playing two regular-season games internationally on a regular basis?

RG: We played in Mexico last year in the regular season and it was a great success. We did it successfully in the sense that not only was it well received by our fans in Mexico, but the teams felt it was a great experience for them and it
preserved the competitive quality of the two teams. That's something we are going to look to do more often.

Schwantz: Is that something you are going look to do early in the season before teams start to get into the stretch run of their season? Is that something that would be taken into consideration when selecting teams to play in these games?

RG: Absolutely. It would be high on our list. It's the competitive issues that are involved when you are taking teams internationally. We played in October last year. My guess is that you wouldn't play (international games) beyond October.
Schwantz: Is China an area in which you want to expand in future years? Playing more games in different venues over there?

RG: Yes it is. We have never played a game in China, so this is our first experience playing in Beijing. We think it's a great market for us. There is a tremendous amount of interest in American sports in general, but we think that the NFL is the greatest game in the world. We look forward to bringing our game over there. We expect it will be a great success.

Hilgenberg: When you were a kid in the backyard throwing around "The Duke" with your brothers, did you ever dream that one day your name would be on that ball?

RG: No, I didn't. It's funny you say that, Jay. I've been in the league for 25 years and they handed me a football a couple days after I was selected. It was reallyan incredible moment. I hadn't thought about that much, but it's a neat thing.

Gleason: You were talking about the NFL being the greatest game. Certainly in Chicago, this has always been the franchise. When this team wins, it galvanizes the entire city. What does it mean to the NFL if the Bears are successful?

RG: It is great for the league. As for the effect we can have on a community, we saw that last week in New Orleans with the Saints coming back and playing in the Superdome. It was just an unbelievable moment for the NFL and, frankly, for
our country to be able to see them celebrate in New Orleans. You get the same feeling here in Chicago. My wife's family is from the area. I know how important the Bears are to this community, b ut they're important to the NFL primarily because of their success and their tradition. When the Bears are good, it's a great thing for the NFL. So we're glad to see them back and playing well.

Gleason: You bring up the Saints. Of course, that is one of teams people are speculating may move to Los Angeles. How do you see that working out?

RG: The success we had last Monday night, the people just supported the Saints so well down there. They are going through so much. Certainly there are more questions than answers down there, but our commitment is to do what's right for
that community right now and make sure that we doing everything to ensure the Saints are successful down there.

Gleason: Injuries are always a big story in the league. (Tampa Bay QB) Chris Simms goes down last week with an injury and winds up having an operation to have his spleen removed. There are so many rules that come up every single year, especially to protect the quarterback and other players as well. What more can the league actually do to protect these
guys?

RG: Injuries, as Jim and Jay know, are part of every sport, much less football where you have a great deal of contact. Every year we look at what we can do from a rules perspective to make the game safer for our players, but also from an
equipment standpoint. Equipment has gotten better and better. We'll continue to try to find new ways to promote player safety because that's what people want to see. They want to see our great players on the field and we want to make sure
we do that as safely as possible.

Schwantz: Do you see the NFL Europe League as part of NFL's future
plans?

RG: I do, Jim. We've had NFL Europe for 15 years. It's been a great success because it's given players a greater opportunity to play. Anytime you can get guys a chance to play, it benefits the players and the game itself. We're seeing that tonight, because you've got a great player on the Bears who came from the Arena League to make a big impact (WR Rashied Davis).

Hilgenberg: I have a question about last year's Super Bowl. I know it's an all-star crew that works the Super Bowl. Has there been any discussion about having the top-rated crew work that game to help the communication between officials? I think there were a few plays in last year's game that could have been cleared up by some better communication between
officials.

RG: Jay, that's an ongoing issue that we've been looking at. We've actually started to move back to a crew-based system over the past couple of years in the playoffs. But you have to balance it. Do you really want to put a rookie, a firstyear
official, out on field who hasn't been part of that experience? So we make a modification to the crew to allow some of our more senior officials to get in there.

Gleason: I'd be remiss if I didn't bring up some of the off-the-field things that are going on in the league in terms of players. (Cincinnati LB) Odell Thurman was been suspended for the year. There have been a number of arrests recently. Ricky Manning Jr. of the Bears was involved with something here recently. What kind of expectations do you have for the
players? I know you met with one of the teams in recent weeks to talk about what is expected.

RG: Ron, I met with your Bears yesterday and I have met with three teams now. The NFL is held to a higher standard and we should be. We are the NFL. The players have to understand that it's not only a privilege to play in this league, but
it's also a great responsibility to behave and be positive role models in the community. For the most part, most our players do that. They are terrific athletes and terrific people. But obviously when you have 2,000 young men, you are
going to have some people that find themselves on the wrong side of the law. We're going to deal with that harshly. We have strong programs and policies against that and we'll continue to enforce those very aggressively.
Gleason: Congratulations on the new position.

RG: Thank you, Ron.
###