Monday, November 09, 2009

CNN ratings slump cure? Video blogging and i-Report

It's no secret that CNN has faced a massive ratings slide. According to Nielsen, CNN has seen its numbers fall 25 percent when compared to this time last year, when the election season just wrapped up with now-President Barack Obama's historic win.

Many have speculated on what's wrong with CNN, from Lou Dobbs' biased and occasionally racially charged reporting, to some feeling that CNN backs President Obama, while others observe that CNN attacks President Obama. But whatever the case, there's a problem. My read is that CNN's lost its identity.

It's more than having a liberal or conservative view, its the brand. The CNN brand has been and should be one centered around what it was designed for: the presentation of news 24 hours a day. But in this opinion-driven media environment, viewers want something with an edge. CNN's had the answer all along: i-Report.

The i-Report system is a website that allows you to upload .Mov file or MPEG file videos of your comments, events, or interviews. The i-Report staff selects what videos are "tagged" for use by CNN, or called "On CNN."

The i-Reports are primarily used in CNN's event coverage and are especially useful during the reporting of disasters and political conventions. I was one of CNN's featured i-Reporters last year at the DNC convention and made this now famous video called Clinton Delegate Tells Off Clinton "Supporter staring Florida radio talk show host Mitch Mallett (embedable YouTube version shown):



As I told i-Report staffers Lila King (who's the boss) and Henry Hanks and others, including CNN Executive Producer Andreas Preuss, the future of CNN is in weaving i-Reports into its basic coverage more often and even having one show based on i-Reporter discussing the topics of the day.

As I told i-Report staffers Lila King and Henry Hanks and others, including Executive Producer Andreas Preuss, the future of CNN is in weaving i-Reports into its basic coverage more often and even having one show based on i-Reporter discussing the topics of the day.

Here's a video taste of a day at CNN with the i-Report staff:



Moreover the i-Report website should be redesigned to allow and encourage video-bloggers to make videos in response to each other, thus starting a video conversation thread, as happens at Vloggerheads.com, the best site for pure video-blogging content currently available.

With these changes, people will tune in to see other common people on the issues of the day. Moreover, it can be used as an easy outlet for experts to give their opinions on a story, eliminating the need for a cameraperson and reporter while allowing more people to weight in via video.

It would become an American addiction and cause CNN to regain its ratings lead.

Chief's running back Larry Johnson cut by team after blasts

Proving that some celebrities aren't as fortunate as Taylor Swift, Kansas City Chiefs Running Back Larry Johnson was released by the team today.

The online press release reads:

The Kansas City Chiefs released RB Larry Johnson on Monday. In 75 games (55 starts) with Kansas City, Johnson rushed 1,375 times for 5,996 yards (4.4 avg.) with 55 touchdowns. He also registered 151 receptions for 1,369 yards (9.1 avg.) with six TDs. He concluded his Chiefs career with 30 100-yard rushing games and also added two 100-yard receiving games.

Johnson established an NFL single-season record with 416 rushing attempts in 2006 when he set a franchise single-season mark with 1,789 rushing yards. He originally entered the league as the Chiefs first-round selection (27th overall) in the 2003 NFL Draft out of Penn State.

What it doesn't discuss is how Johnson insulted (rightfully) his coach Todd Haley and got off f-blasts (wrongly) that were slurs against the homosexual community. While Johnson apologized for his actions (which Taylor Swift has yet to do)

Johnson's Twitter tweets are protected, so no word from that source on his reaction to the news. But it's important to repost his apology:

First of all, I want to apologize to the fans of the Kansas City Chiefs and the rest of the NFL, Commissioner Goodell, the Chiefs organization, Coach Todd Haley, his staff, and my teammates for the words I used yesterday"

"I regret my actions. The words were used by me in frustration, and they were not appropriate. I did not intend to offend anyone, but that is no excuse for what I said. "

"I also want to apologize to all the kids who view athletes as role models. I was not a good role model yesterday and hopefully I can become a better role model. We all make mistakes, and the challenge is to learn from them. I will do my best to learn from this one as I move toward becoming a better person, teammate, and member of the Kansas City chiefs team and community."

Johnson leaves a Chief's team that's one of the worst in the NFL with a 1 and 7 record as of this writing. I'm not a fan of Chief's Coach Todd Haley because I do not like the way he treats his players. He talks down to them, argues with them, and lords over them, and its no surprise they don't perform for him.

Former Coach Herman Edwards may not have been an "X's and O's" guy but the players wanted to win for him - they could have bounced back from a 2 and 14 record under Edwards if he were retained.

I like Haley's offensive schemes but he's got to really change the way he relates to players. Why Chief's GM Scott Pioli thought he was the best choice is beyond me.

Meanwhile Larry Johnson is off to a better place with a number of NFL teams, like the San Diego Chargers, who could employ his talent. Stay tuned.

Would Senator Joe Lieberman choose Iraq War death over Health Care life?


Senator Joe Lieberman 

The Iraq War costs almost $700 billion since 2001 according to the National Priorities Project, and that cost is still climbing. There have been an estimated 1,033,000 violent deaths because of that war.

During that time Senator Joe Lieberman (I - Connecticut) never once expressed a concern for war spending and the national debt. In fact, he was at odds with Democrats on the Iraq War and never mentioned a concern for spending on it.

Joe Lieberman's 2006 Democratic Senate challenger Ned Lamont compared his support-with-caveat stance on the Iraq War with Richard Nixon's position on the Vietnam War and found striking similarities. Even then Lieberman never expressed a paramount concern with war spending and the National Debt.

Why then does he raise the issue when reforming Health Care is the subject? It's no wonder there was this protest in front of his office last week:



It would be great to see Senator Lieberman do the right thing for America and back a Health Care bill with a public option.

Rep Anh "Joseph" Cao on CNN: Only GOP To vote for Health Reform

Senator Joe Lieberman should take note of Republican Rep. Anh "Joseph" Cao, who became the only House member of the GOP to vote for Health Care Reform on Saturday, after passage of the historic bill. Now, it's on to the U.S. Senate, where rather uninformed folks like Senator Joe Lieberman reside. What can Rep. Cao teach Senator Lieberman?

How to think about his constituents.

On CNN, Rep. Cao said he "had to make a decision of conscience based on the needs of the people in my district."



Can Joe Lieberman put the needs of Connecticut residents ahead of his own? Almost 30,000 people in his state lost health insurance in 2009 because of job losses.

Lieberman must prove he cares about Connecticut's people and not Aetna Health Insurance Corporation, who reportedly gave him $65,000 in 2005 and he's gotten more than that from other firms over that time.

Does Lieberman care about his people, or himself?

We will find out, soon.

Oakland Adams Point residents concerned about Round Table Pizza

Business is vitally important to the energy and safety of Oakland's Adams Point / Lake Merritt neighborhood (defined by Grand Avenue, Harrison Avenue, and the I-580 Freeway) but it's a two way street: the retailers must take steps to maintain a safe district too.


Pizza's great; is the car double parked?  

Round Table Pizza on Grand and Staten Avenues does well with the pizza delivery side of its business. But that success, and the need to keep the facility's carpet clean, has caused a parking and street traffic problem on Staten. Solving the issue was the objective behind two messages left on the Adams Point Action Council Yahoo Group forum:

Hi Name Withheld,

I wanted to bring to your attention that Round Table Pizza on Grand @ Staten is in a pattern of ordering steam cleaning of its carpets every few months that is very loud and goes from about 10:00-11:30pm. They have a truck come that parks on the street and runs a loud generator out of the truck. I brought the issue to the manager a few months back and he told me he would "look into" having the cleaning happen at a different time (although I got the impression he was just blowing me off). I went just now as I noticed again a loud humming in my apartment and the manager on site said he didn't know how to change this (he also didn't seem very accomodating) . He told me the place opens at 11:00am after he told me they couldn't steam the carpets in the morning. I don't think I am getting anywhere going directly to them, so your assistance in this matter would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Name and Address withheld

This was the "Friends Of Lake Merritt Response":

Posted by: "Friends of Lake Merritt" friendsoflakemerritt@yahoo.com friendsoflakemerritt
Sun Nov 8, 2009 7:48 am (PST)

The carpet cleaning must be a nuisance to those who live nearby - but there is an ongoing problem with the Round Table on Grand that impacts on a much larger population, and is potentially fatal: The Round Table delivery cars double park in the middle of Staten, which means that part of Staten becomes a one-lane road for a big hunk of the evening. This is especially dangerous because people turn right off of Grand with very little warning that there might be an oncoming car trying to get around the delivery vehicles by going into the "wrong" lane. I wonder why the army of parking citation vultures that our City Council unleashed on the populace this past summer missed that lucrative little corner, and how many accidents this has already caused.

The best answer is for the Round Table Pizza delivery drivers to park in front of the establishment on Grand Avenue, where there's a larger lane for parking and three lanes, than on Staten Avenue, which isn't designed to handle the constant double parking practice. Let's see if the Round Table Pizza franchise manager now responds to the resident's complaints.

I hope so.

Sunday, November 08, 2009

Taylor Swift blasts Kanye West in SNL intro - no apology on symbol

Taylor Swift was on Saturday Night Live and I have to say performed really well. She was in eight skits, playing everything from a prison gang-banger to the friend of a bride at a wedding.

But one place I didn't think Taylor would go in her monologue was to mention Kanye West, but not apologize for that Swastika photo. That took Taylor down a bit in my rating of her.

If you remember, rapper Kanye West famously took the stage at the MTV Video Music Awards as Swift was about to accept the award for "Best Female Video" and said that the award should have gone to Beyonce. It was a classless move that had even President Obama weighing in, calling West "A Jackass":



But after a questionable delay, West apologized on his website and did called Swift later that week. Kanye West apologized for insulting a single person, Taylor Swift, but she did not say "I'm sorry" for posing in a photo with Swastika-t-shirt-wearing Hollywood model A.J. English at Katy Perry's 25th birthday party (English quickly apologized for that):



I can't figure out which is worse: Swift's silence on the action, the small number of fans that have multiple accounts and leave comments pretending to be other people and writing that the Swastika is a symbol of peace, or the silence of the Anti-Defamation League, which is supposed to be speaking out against this crap.

I'll say it and write it, and I don't care what anyone thinks because it's true as of this writing. It's easier for people in America to attack an African American male celebrity when he's wrong than it is for Americans to criticize a young blonde white woman celebrity when she's wrong, and a white male celebrity too, but not to the degree of a woman. It's a stupid pecking order.

Kansas City Chief's running back Larry Johnson used homophobic language but apologized, yet some are calling for his ouster from the team. And if a black male public figure makes a single comment that's racist, like Jesse Jackson's stupid "Hymie Town" comment of over a decade ago, it still sticks with him years later.

Why not the same for someone like Taylor Swift? Or for that matter Mel Gibson, who's anti-Jewish rants after a DUI stop got some talking, but no real punishment or constant criticism and Billionaire Mel's on the PR comeback trail as I write this.

The only white male celebrity I can think of who's career was really impacted by his dumb behavior was Seinfeld's Michael Richards, who went off at a comedy club in LA about African Americans, saying “Fifty years ago we’d have you upside down with a fucking fork up your ass!”

Now to make sure this is clear, all of these actions were wrong. Each person I've list apologized for what they did many times, but not Taylor Swift. Not once. No, she didn't say something offensive, but I now have the feeling Swift could get away with it, if she did.

Swift's a wonderful singer and an incredibly talented person; her songs are like a taste of Heaven. Taylor Swift is someone I want to like. But she must remember that she's also a public figure and a role model to young women. Swift can and indeed must set a good example, if not to please people like me, then at least for young women. An apology is a good start.

Cal v. Oregon State - After loss, Cal fans dread Stanford's success




The stage was set for Cal's BCS rise and a realistic shot at the Pac-10 Championship. Earlier Saturday, The Stanford Cardinal ran all over Oregon 51 - 42, and did what I and other Cal fans wanted but many believed impossible: give Oregon a second loss. Notre Dame was surprised by the play of a Navy team that showed heart and lost 23 to 21, tossing it out of the BCS race. Iowa, which won close games they arguably should have lost, was upset by Northwestern, 17 to 10, for their first defeat of the year.

Cal was set to make a move higher into the BCS standings and catch Oregon if they beat Oregon State. That "if" did not happen and after the game (Cal lost 31 - 14) Cal fans were talking about Stanford's success and how much they hated it. But first, a look at what happened.

Cal was out-hit; the game plan terrible


Even before the loss of Cal's star Jahvid Best before halftime due to what turned out to be a concussion, Oregon State was giving Cal all it could handle. I've never written or said this before, not even after the USC loss, but Oregon State's defense hit Cal harder than any other opponent I've seen this year. Cal was out-hit on Saturday.

That's not the main factor for the loss, the terrible offensive and defensive game plans were, but it was such that it must be noted. Other than that, the main statistical indicator of a Cal loss remained: at 19 of 34 for 200 yards and one touchdown Quarterback Kevin Riley was below the 60 percent completion mark.

Of course Cal's performance can't be described without taking into account Best's loss. The sight of Cal's popular player laying motionless for that moment took the wind out of both the team and its fans. Memorial Stadium took on the feel and mood of a wake. But it's at that point that a team should find its character and, in this case, win it for Best.

While that's exactly what the players wanted to do, they were hampered by the worst offensive game plan and play-calling I've seen from the Golden Bears this year.

For some reason Cal Head Coach Jeff Tedford and Offensive Coordinator Andy Ludiwg were in love with calling the swing pass to the slot receiver again and again, and in situations where that play would not gain, say nine yards for a first down on 3rd and 9, as was done in the fourth quarter.

Tedford and Ludwig had the right formation idea - five wide receivers - but continuously running that play when it did not work was really frustrating to watch.

When the play calls were right on, Riley failed to connect with open receivers, essentially reverting to his overthrow habit of a few games back. But even here, a correctable pattern has emerged: Riley simply does not throw the crossing pattern or corner pattern or any lateral movement pass pattern calling for the passer to "lead" the receiver, consistently well, yet Tedford and Ludwig keep calling plays featuring those patterns. This has been a season-long problem.

If one goes back to the videos from this season, Riley throws the deep fly pattern well, the post pattern, as well as most quick-opening patterns like slants. But the kind of passes Riley would throw well don't seem to be a major part of Cal's system: hook patterns where the receiver goes 12 yard and then turns back into the quarterback; or drive patterns, which are deeper variations of the slant pattern, or seam patterns with the slot receiver and "out" patterns to the sideline, with varying depths timed to the quarterback's dropback. That's several different patterns alone that Riley would excel at executing if they were in Cal's system and drilled on again and again.

The best offenses fit the plays to what the quarterback does best. Yes, you may say Riley should learn to make those throws, but not during the season; that's what the off-season is for. If he can't do that, forcing him to make the throws he's not good at only produces losses and Cal's got three of them now.

The Defensive Game Plan was not much better


What my Cal friends and I could not understand was why Cal Defensive Coordinator Bob Gregory had such a soft game plan against Oregon State. With a team that uses as much backfield playaction as the Beavers do, constant blitz pressure is the tonic to down their backs for losses and hurry throws.

The Cal Defense looked like it was consistently dazzled by Oregon's play-action rollouts, and that's because Cal was basically sitting back and watching them rather than sending outside linebackers to disrupt plays. Tight, man-for-man coverage while sending as many as six rushers would have produced a different outcome than the 342 yards and two touchdowns quarterback Sean Canfield threw for on Saturday.

Bob Gregory must practice using a variation of the 3-4 Defense that  has the defensive ends between the offensive guards and tackles to better stop the kind of linebuck and off-tackle plays that were consistently used by Oregon State.  OSU ran into the "bubble areas" where the inside linebackers were in that defense; moving the ends inside would cure that problem and force plays to the outside. 

Stanford's win sets up a really big, "Big Game"


At Henry's, The Bear's Lair, Larry Blake's, and the other popular football game day bars and restaurants, Cal fans were down and for several reasons: Best's injury, the loss, and Stanford's success.

Cal fans wanted Stanford's win only in the context of a Cal victory over Oregon State. But in the wake of the loss, Stanford's victory over 8th ranked Oregon has Blues young and old seeing red.

At 6-3 for the season, but 5-2 in the Pac-10, the Cardinal are bowl-eligible for the first time in eight years and peaking at the right time. Oregon is now 7 and 1, but 5 and 1 in the Pac-10, with pesky Arizona State (which should have beat USC but lost 14 to 9) up next. If Oregon loses that game, Cal beats Arizona (which is 6 and 2 overall, but 4 and 1 in the Pac-10), and Stanford beats USC, the Cardinal will be in the drive's seat for the Pac-10 Championship. Saturday, November 14th is a red letter day but Saturday, November 21 is an even bigger day.

On that day the two Pac-10 teams in control of their destiny, Oregon and Arizona, play each other, while Cal travels down to The Farm for The Big Game. Let's say by then that Cal has beaten Arizona, Oregon lost to Arizona State, and Stanford beat USC.

Oregon would have two Pac-10 losses, and in a three-way tie with Stanford and Arizona. That makes The Big Game a must win for The Cardinal and the Oregon v. Arizona contest a potential bloodfest, with Oregon favored by Stanford fans (Stanford lost to Arizona).

Finally, The Big Game really matters.

The only way to make up for this terrible Oregon State loss is for Cal to beat Arizona and Stanford. The way Cal fans will look at this entire season will be defined in the next two exciting weeks.

GO BEARS!