Wow. Steve Tyler's first "Go" as a judge on American Idol is making waves and causing him to be a Twitter Trend as this blog post is written. He's the counterpoint to the softy that is Jennifer Lopez; a guy who can say "no" to most New Jersey Idol contestants.
But one contestant had him saying more than "yes," and exclaiming "I will personally work that into something good!"
The "that" is a woman who's musical approach didn't hit with Randy Jackson, Idol's 10 year veteran, but she so wanted to go to Hollywood, and was so energetic and enthusiastic she willed her way into getting the votes she needed and from Tyler and Lopez.
That was when Tyler made the exclamation that made this blogger howl.
But that Steve Tyler's got to watch his comments there, I think.
About 16-year old Victoria, who's Southern accent, pink dress, and pixy way dazzled the judges, Tyler points and says said "Yeah. Just showing the right amount of leg." To which I'm thinking and Randy Jackson's thinking "Dude, what's up with that."
Wow.
Let's hope Tyler's not trying to "work that into something good."
Stay tuned.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Sen. Joe Lieberman Retires Today - YIPPEE!
Sen. Joe Lieberman announced his retirement today, and after a long career of public service as Connecticut's senior Senator. All this blogger can say is "YIPPEE!"
Look, Senator Lieberman will not be forgotten for endorsing Senator John McCain over Senator Barack Obama for President in 2008. Just thinking about that again brings up bad memories for many Democrats.
In 2008, Lieberman took Obama to task for his words putting the blame for the rise of Iran on America's fighting the Iraq War, which Obama has long said was the wrong war.
Rather than siding with Obama, Lieberman went against him even though he was warned not to do so. In one of the dumbest political moves since Nixon and Watergate, Joe was so sure Obama was going to lose, and probably because he thought America would not vote for a black person for President, he openly went against him.
Today, Joe smartly looked around and figured he would have a hard time getting money and help, especially from Dems.
Now Connecticut can vote for a real Democrat for Senator.
Catwoman: Anne Hathaway Should Put On Some Muscle
Anne Hathaway has been selected to play "Catwoman" in Christopher Nolan's newest planned installment of his Batman movie series, The Dark Knight Rises, set for release in 2012.
Great.
But then I considered Anne's slim body.
It's perfect for Vera Wang, but not for Catwoman.
And when I thought about it, Catwoman was, at least in the comics, more in build like Scarlett Johansson as "Black Widow" in Iron Man II.
That means, Anne's going to have to put on some muscle for the Catwoman. She's a bit too skinny right now. Her look is fine for roles like in The Devil Wears Prada, but for The Dark Knight Rises?
She needs muscle - 20 pounds of it, at least.
That is unless Nolan has an idea for a "different" take on Catwoman. I hope it's along the line of the modern Catwoman as created by Mindy Newell (from Frank Miller's 1986 take), which has her as a prostitute working just to survive, becomes a martial arts expert, and turns burglar then elects to remain in a cat suit after a confrontation with Batman.
Anne's got to get buffed for that.
Stay tuned.
Great.
But then I considered Anne's slim body.
It's perfect for Vera Wang, but not for Catwoman.
And when I thought about it, Catwoman was, at least in the comics, more in build like Scarlett Johansson as "Black Widow" in Iron Man II.
That means, Anne's going to have to put on some muscle for the Catwoman. She's a bit too skinny right now. Her look is fine for roles like in The Devil Wears Prada, but for The Dark Knight Rises?
She needs muscle - 20 pounds of it, at least.
That is unless Nolan has an idea for a "different" take on Catwoman. I hope it's along the line of the modern Catwoman as created by Mindy Newell (from Frank Miller's 1986 take), which has her as a prostitute working just to survive, becomes a martial arts expert, and turns burglar then elects to remain in a cat suit after a confrontation with Batman.
Anne's got to get buffed for that.
Stay tuned.
Oakland Raiders Al Davis / Hue Jackson Press Conference (Video)
Raiders Manager Of The General Partner Al Davis could not resist hiring Hue Jackson as the new Head Coach of The Oakland Raiders without giving another informative and memorable press conference.
An Aside
As an aside, Coach Jackson is someone I've pushed for NFL Offensive Coordinator or NFL Head Coach since 2006, as my friend and former Oakland Raiders Running Back Michael Dotterer reminded me the other day.
Moreover, I bluntly told Raiders fans that the Raiders should fire then-offensive coordinator Tom Walsh and bring in Hue Jackson and that was in the 2006 NFL Preseason. Walsh went on to be a total failure and arguably cost Art Shell his job as the head guy of The Raiders. And that was at a time when the Green Bay Packers hired a then-green Mike McCarthy and let him grow into the role of Packers Head Coach; an opportunity enjoyed only by perhaps one other black head coach in the NFL, Lovie Smith of The Chicago Bears.
Coach Jackson is one of the giants of the modern passing game. He just needs the canvas to show it; now he's got it.
Back to The Video
Davis, obviously in less-than-good health and under-going treatments, was none-the-less sharp as a tack, recounting juicy details, and even giving Oakland Tribune Columnist Monte Poole a well-deserved kudos, even though Davis could have mentioned his name.
Here's the entire press conference on video thanks to The Raider Nation Podcast on YouTube:
Part One:
Part Two:
Part Three:
Part Four:
Part Five:
Part Six:
Part Seven:
Part Eight:
Hue Jackson will bring a Super Bowl Trophy to Oakland. Mark that.
Bank on it.
An Aside
As an aside, Coach Jackson is someone I've pushed for NFL Offensive Coordinator or NFL Head Coach since 2006, as my friend and former Oakland Raiders Running Back Michael Dotterer reminded me the other day.
Moreover, I bluntly told Raiders fans that the Raiders should fire then-offensive coordinator Tom Walsh and bring in Hue Jackson and that was in the 2006 NFL Preseason. Walsh went on to be a total failure and arguably cost Art Shell his job as the head guy of The Raiders. And that was at a time when the Green Bay Packers hired a then-green Mike McCarthy and let him grow into the role of Packers Head Coach; an opportunity enjoyed only by perhaps one other black head coach in the NFL, Lovie Smith of The Chicago Bears.
Coach Jackson is one of the giants of the modern passing game. He just needs the canvas to show it; now he's got it.
Back to The Video
Davis, obviously in less-than-good health and under-going treatments, was none-the-less sharp as a tack, recounting juicy details, and even giving Oakland Tribune Columnist Monte Poole a well-deserved kudos, even though Davis could have mentioned his name.
Here's the entire press conference on video thanks to The Raider Nation Podcast on YouTube:
Part One:
Part Two:
Part Three:
Part Four:
Part Five:
Part Six:
Part Seven:
Part Eight:
Hue Jackson will bring a Super Bowl Trophy to Oakland. Mark that.
Bank on it.
Jersey Shore Season 3 Episode 3
It seems as though Sammi has redeemed herself by apologizing to Snooki for the way she acted. It is unclear whether or not Sammi and Ronnie are still together - it was going back and forth a bit and there are scenes of the two fighting followed by scenes of them just talking - followed by hearing, "I'm Done!"
Deena really wants to have sex with The Situation...REALLY badly. This is really funny, because he wanted a threesome with Snooki, but when Snooki left he described it as having chicken with salt and pepper - but then having the chicken taken away. That's great. She wants to have sex with him so bad, and he has done it with some grenades - but Deena apparently isn't good enough for him. Does Mike actually have standards?
Snooki is a lush. Snooki drinks and drinks and drinks. Is this for publicity or is this real? Because this is not okay.
JWOWW flirting it up with an ex, but then she is upset to find out that the ex may be dating someone else.
Oh, Jersey Shore.
Bentley: Christians are 'Brothers and Sisters'
Fox News reported that Alabama Governor, (Republican) Robert Bentley, who has only been in office three days, is facing a lot of criticism for a remark that he made to a crowd at Dexter Avenue King Memorial Baptist Church. Bentley remarked that if they have not accepted Jesus Christ as their savior then they are not his brother or his sister.
The Southeast regional director of the Anti-Defamation League told Fox that Bentley should understand the impact of his remarks.
Alabama Images |
Fox includes:
Bentley was sworn in shortly before he spoke at the church where the late civil rights leader Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was once a pastor. According to The Birmingham News, during his speech he said it was important for Alabamians to ''love and care for each other." He also told the crowd he is color blind. But just minutes later, he went on to say if they don’t have the same ‘daddy’ then they are not brothers and sisters.
"There may be some people here today who do not have living within them the Holy Spirit," Bentley said during his speech. ''But if you have been adopted in God's family like I have, and like you have if you're a Christian and if you're saved, and the Holy Spirit lives within you just like the Holy Spirit lives within me, then you know what that makes? It makes you and me brothers. And it makes you and me brother and sister."
Bentley's director of communications, Rebekah Manson got in touch with Fox on behalf of Bentley and explained that he had no intention of offending anyone by his remarks.
The First Amendment gives him the right to express himself, but that doesn't mean that people don't have the right to be offended by what he says. Freedom of speech doesn't remove freedom of thought.
Gene Policinski is the executive director of the First Amendment Center and he says that Bentley needs to keep in mind that his office represents all faith. Fox quotes:
“When a politician might reveal his beliefs, it is creating an impression,” Policinski said. “Religion is a part of many peoples’ lives, but there is an implication when a particular faith receives favorable or disfavorable treatment. It is a very difficult line to draw, but it is one any politician has to be aware of.”
Rick Sloan of U-Cubed to Guest on Jobless Talk This Friday
Rick Sloan, Acting Executive Director of U-Cubed, will guest appear on Jobless Talk This Friday - January 21, 2011. Sloan will be discussing the exciting U-Cubed plans for 2011, transforming the Union of the Unemployed into a major player in the fight to resolve the “jobless-related issues” plaguing America today.
Key topics for the show are: the UCubed elections, 112th Congress, FDR's Second Bill of Rights, Redistricting and relief for 99ers. Rick Sloan will be taking calls from listeners so bring all your questions Friday at Noon Pacific time. **Call-in Number: (347) 857-2884**
Rick Sloan is the Acting Executive Director of U-Cubed, Union of Unemployed, and has been the IAM Communications Director since 2000. Before joining the Machinists Union, he ran Challenge America, Inc., a union-focused public affairs firm, for fifteen years. Sloan has served as the Administrative Assistant to Congressman John D. Dingell (D-MI) and the late Senator Howard M. Metzenbaum (D-OH). His book, The Gift of Strategy, and his blogs on Huffington Post have prodded Democrats to fight harder for blue collar worker and the unemployed.
Don’t miss this opportunity to speak directly to the man who can answer any questions you may have about U-Cubed and if you havent done so already, please consider checking out this important group of unemployment advocates! There is strength, unity and progress in numbers.
U-Cubed on:
FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/ucubed
TWITTER: @U_Cubed
WEBSITE: http://www.unionofunemployed.com
[The donation button below is for Paladinette. If you like what I write please donate so I can keep on fighting for the 99ers! Thank You!]
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Gallup Reports: Muslims and Westerners Say More Interaction Is Better, Obama Helps
The Couch Potato (as opposed to common) Conservatives like Michelle Malkin would have you believe that Muslims "hate" westerners, and particularly Americans, and don't want to interact. But the results of a multi-year research report say otherwise.
According to Islam Online, 59 percent of those surveyed think more, not less, interaction between Westerners and Muslims would be a benefit and not a threat. Those are the findings of a study entitled “Measuring the State of Muslim-West Relations: Assessing the ‘New Beginning’," by John L.Esposito and Dalia Mogahed of the Gallop Organization, and finished and released on November 28, 2010, although its findings are just being widely disseminated. (You can see it with a click here.)
At the center of the study is a poll that surveyed almost 100,000 people in 49 countries. It revealed the following:
1. Muslim views of Muslim-Western relations have changed over time, and for the better. The study reports "In 2009, 61 percent of MENA (Middle East and North Africa) residents - compared with 52 percent of those living in Asia and 49 percent of those in sub - Saharan Africa - said the quality of the interaction between the Muslim and Western worlds is important to them.
2. The degree of change in Middle East and North Africa residents has been greatest since Barack Obama was elected President of The United States. But Obama's approval rating declined in MENA regions in 2010. That's not attributed entirely to policy change, specifically the War in Afghanistan, but an increased awareness of Muslim-Western relations by Muslims after Obama became President of The United States.
3. While the state of Muslim-Western relations is important to Muslims, they don't believe Westerners share the same level of concern.
4. Those who say violent Muslim-Western conflict is unavoidable are more likely to point to religion as the basis for the forecast of increased tensions.
5. Muslim-Western tensions rise more from political than religious conflict. The study reports "Increasingly, a strong focus on the Iraq war and a sense ofurgency in calling for complete U.S. withdrawal is another unique aspect of sentiment in the MENA region." That would force the question on the War in Afghanistan.
On that note, the study focuses on Afghans, explaining the results of eight years of research:
Moreover, a majority of Afghans (55 percent) explain that "things have gotten better" since the fall of the Taliban. But the most interesting statistic is that a fewer Afghans view Muslim-Western interaction as a benefit.
A Complex Report, But Overall, Good News
The study contains far more information than presented here, and is worth a good read when you have the time. As Sara Reef noted in Islam Online "although we have made some progress in improving Muslim-Western relations, there is still a lot of work to be done." But it's also clear that President Obama has been the driving force in America's improved image to the Muslim World.
Moreover, it's clear the Muslim World is more complex and varied than man Americans realize. That's a direct counter to Couch Potato Conservatives like Sarah Palin, who tend to refer to and paint Muslims with one brush, and believing that Muslims can be easily profiled. Or Michelle Malkin, herself Asian, but has no problem casting Muslims as one people and in a distorted and bad light.
Hopefully 2011 will see the emergence of more enlightened conversation on Muslim-Western relations, without the noise from Palin and Malkin.
Stay tuned.
According to Islam Online, 59 percent of those surveyed think more, not less, interaction between Westerners and Muslims would be a benefit and not a threat. Those are the findings of a study entitled “Measuring the State of Muslim-West Relations: Assessing the ‘New Beginning’," by John L.Esposito and Dalia Mogahed of the Gallop Organization, and finished and released on November 28, 2010, although its findings are just being widely disseminated. (You can see it with a click here.)
At the center of the study is a poll that surveyed almost 100,000 people in 49 countries. It revealed the following:
1. Muslim views of Muslim-Western relations have changed over time, and for the better. The study reports "In 2009, 61 percent of MENA (Middle East and North Africa) residents - compared with 52 percent of those living in Asia and 49 percent of those in sub - Saharan Africa - said the quality of the interaction between the Muslim and Western worlds is important to them.
2. The degree of change in Middle East and North Africa residents has been greatest since Barack Obama was elected President of The United States. But Obama's approval rating declined in MENA regions in 2010. That's not attributed entirely to policy change, specifically the War in Afghanistan, but an increased awareness of Muslim-Western relations by Muslims after Obama became President of The United States.
3. While the state of Muslim-Western relations is important to Muslims, they don't believe Westerners share the same level of concern.
4. Those who say violent Muslim-Western conflict is unavoidable are more likely to point to religion as the basis for the forecast of increased tensions.
5. Muslim-Western tensions rise more from political than religious conflict. The study reports "Increasingly, a strong focus on the Iraq war and a sense ofurgency in calling for complete U.S. withdrawal is another unique aspect of sentiment in the MENA region." That would force the question on the War in Afghanistan.
On that note, the study focuses on Afghans, explaining the results of eight years of research:
Much has been written about the major security challenges facing Afghanistan.Yet when Gallup asked Afghans an open-ended question about the single-most important problem their families face today, the most frequent responsesgiven in October 2009 were bad economy in their local city or region (21 percent),unemployment (20 percent), high costs of goods/personal financial problems (15 percent),and lack of security (15 percent).
Moreover, a majority of Afghans (55 percent) explain that "things have gotten better" since the fall of the Taliban. But the most interesting statistic is that a fewer Afghans view Muslim-Western interaction as a benefit.
A Complex Report, But Overall, Good News
The study contains far more information than presented here, and is worth a good read when you have the time. As Sara Reef noted in Islam Online "although we have made some progress in improving Muslim-Western relations, there is still a lot of work to be done." But it's also clear that President Obama has been the driving force in America's improved image to the Muslim World.
Moreover, it's clear the Muslim World is more complex and varied than man Americans realize. That's a direct counter to Couch Potato Conservatives like Sarah Palin, who tend to refer to and paint Muslims with one brush, and believing that Muslims can be easily profiled. Or Michelle Malkin, herself Asian, but has no problem casting Muslims as one people and in a distorted and bad light.
Hopefully 2011 will see the emergence of more enlightened conversation on Muslim-Western relations, without the noise from Palin and Malkin.
Stay tuned.
99er Dawn Rayner Expanded ABC Interview Released Today
After a disappointing abbreviated version of her interview aired on Sunday, 99er Dawn Rayner’s expanded ABC interview was released today.
Dawn (who can now be found on Twitter @DawnRayner) announced yesterday her surprise at “going viral” with the ABC Sunday Night segment on World News Tonight.
See below the expanded version of the great interview Dawn gave to ABC - below.
UPDATE of the Bud Meyers Story:
Today, the story which commanded the attention of Arianna Huffington and Ali Velshy last Friday and the Host of Radioornot Nicole Sandler this Monday finally hit the Huffington Post in a full feature article by Arthurb Delaney.
From the article:
Meyers wrote that he's out of money and facing eviction in less than a month. He's a "99er" -- a person who exhausted all available unemployment extensions, which in some states amount to 99 weeks of aid, without finding work. There's no official estimate of how many people have exhausted 99 weeks of benefits -- only about half the 50 states provide 99 weeks in the first place -- but the White House estimates that 4 million people will have exhausted all available benefits by the end of the year.
CNN's Ali Velshi said during a Friday broadcast that he saw what Meyers wrote via Twitter. "Bud, I think you're listening, so hang in there," Velshi said. "You're not forgotten by everyone. You're in our heart and thoughts."
Talk-radio veteran Nicole Sandler, who started a website for 99ers, invited Meyers to join her for apodcast on Sunday. She asked him if what he'd written was a suicide note.
"It's a note of desperation, a lack of options," he said. "I want to do everything I can to cling to life. I think life is the most important thing there is. There's that and nothingness. But I'm 55 and been out of work over two years -- I'm not physically fit enough to survive on the street."
FYI: The 99er Nation (UI Exhaustees) welcomes over 22,000 new members every week!
Heads up: Tomorrow’s article will feature more on the upcoming Gust appearence by Rick Sloan of U-Cubed this Friday on Paladinette’s Jobless Talk.....stay tuned for some exciting new things in our fight for Unemployed Americans! Do NOT be left behind. Join U-Cubed Today!
[The donation button below is for Paladinette. If you like what I write please donate so I can keep on fighting for the 99ers! Thank You!]
In response to TEARS FOR A KING
In her column yesterday reflecting on the meaning of celebrating Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday, Tears for a King, Michelle Dianne asked some pointed questions.
Let's define celebrate: to observe or commemorate, typically but not necessarily in a public way, an event, drawing attention to remind others what matters.
The quintessential example is likely "personal" non-holiday birthdays, which rarely (if ever) focus on the woman who gave birth, but instead serve as a reason to express affection, or at least acceptance, without eliciting suspicion of an agenda: we can say, or hear, "Happy Birthday" without looking for motivation beyond "You're OK in my reckoning," even between near strangers. It's a low-cost, low-risk social exchange.
Celebration takes on another dimension altogether when we celebrate an official holiday - when we observe the birthday of a political or religious figure that choice conveys our recognition of their enduring impact - the significance of their contributions to many lives.
In that sense King's holiday is celebration-worthy and, though I might sooner have chosen the anniversary of an event, I accept that his accomplishment went well beyond any one appearance or speech; for all he brought to the consciousness of both oppressed people and those who chose to look the other way, I applaud the Powers That Be (or, that "were" in this case) for ensuring we officially, collectively reflect on and commemorate the impact and importance of his philosophy, commitment, and courage.
It is right, in other words, that children in the United States in particular -- children who might otherwise never so much as hear King's name -- have reason in every school in the nation to learn how awful and un-equal things really were despite the lofty language in our Constitution and the so-called integration of our Armed Forces. History doesn't repeat itself, but people who don't know history may well repeat some mistakes rather than learn from them.
So while her closing question implying we may be making a mistake -- implying the need to think more about the meaning of the day -- was a good one, with much yet unaccomplished, with miles to go and promises of our founding fathers still un-met this cold, snowy January, I submit it is more important to ask routinely either, "How can/does our celebration inspire continuation of the progress toward true equality?" or, "What would Martin do?"
Thomas Hayes is an entrepreneur, former Democratic Campaign Manager, journalist, and photographer who contributes regularly to a host of web sites on topics ranging from economics and politics to culture and community.
"We’re celebrating? From the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire to the molehills of Mississippi, freedom still fails to ring for millions of Americans and we’re celebrating?"
Michelle Dianne
17 January 2011
Let's define celebrate: to observe or commemorate, typically but not necessarily in a public way, an event, drawing attention to remind others what matters.
The quintessential example is likely "personal" non-holiday birthdays, which rarely (if ever) focus on the woman who gave birth, but instead serve as a reason to express affection, or at least acceptance, without eliciting suspicion of an agenda: we can say, or hear, "Happy Birthday" without looking for motivation beyond "You're OK in my reckoning," even between near strangers. It's a low-cost, low-risk social exchange.
Celebration takes on another dimension altogether when we celebrate an official holiday - when we observe the birthday of a political or religious figure that choice conveys our recognition of their enduring impact - the significance of their contributions to many lives.
In that sense King's holiday is celebration-worthy and, though I might sooner have chosen the anniversary of an event, I accept that his accomplishment went well beyond any one appearance or speech; for all he brought to the consciousness of both oppressed people and those who chose to look the other way, I applaud the Powers That Be (or, that "were" in this case) for ensuring we officially, collectively reflect on and commemorate the impact and importance of his philosophy, commitment, and courage.
It is right, in other words, that children in the United States in particular -- children who might otherwise never so much as hear King's name -- have reason in every school in the nation to learn how awful and un-equal things really were despite the lofty language in our Constitution and the so-called integration of our Armed Forces. History doesn't repeat itself, but people who don't know history may well repeat some mistakes rather than learn from them.
I'm fervently in favor of celebrating King's life and the changes his actions stimulated; marking his birthday spreads the awareness, it keeps us from glossing over the past, and conveys that he's as relevant to our story as the officially-most-revered of our Presidents. What we celebrate is that the courage and certainty of King's actions moved us farther, faster in a critical direction than we'd have made it without him. King's holiday is an affirmation of our "all men are created equal" aspiration, and the power of people to grow and improve."The other day R. Lee Gordon asked the African American community on Facebook what it will take to put the “B” back in *Lack Unity; the brother got only two responses. Think about that and answer me this: What are we celebrating?"
Michelle Dianne
17 January 2011
So while her closing question implying we may be making a mistake -- implying the need to think more about the meaning of the day -- was a good one, with much yet unaccomplished, with miles to go and promises of our founding fathers still un-met this cold, snowy January, I submit it is more important to ask routinely either, "How can/does our celebration inspire continuation of the progress toward true equality?" or, "What would Martin do?"
Whose woods these are I think I know.
His house is in the village, though;
He will not see me stopping here
To watch his woods fill up with snow.
My little horse must think it queer
To stop without a farmhouse near
Between the woods and frozen lake
The darkest evening of the year.
He gives his harness bells a shake
To ask if there is some mistake.
The only other sound's the sweep
Of easy wind and downy flake.
The woods are lovely, dark, and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep.
Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening
Robert Frost
Thomas Hayes is an entrepreneur, former Democratic Campaign Manager, journalist, and photographer who contributes regularly to a host of web sites on topics ranging from economics and politics to culture and community.
Wikileaks Julian Assange Up For "Best Founder" At Crunchies - #WikiLeaks
Julian Assange makes his presence felt!
The 2011 Crunchies, the annual awards event for the Tech Community produced by TechCrunch, VentureBeat, and Gigaom, is this Friday in San Francisco, and the voting underway (until Wednesday) reveals a nice surprise.
This blogger was the first to openly push for Wikileaks Editor-In-Chief Julian Assange to receive the "Best Startup Award." This for Wikileaks path-breaking impact on World Industrial Culture, showing just how powerful the Internet really is in its ability to rapidly disseminate important information.
Well, Wikileaks isn't up for Best Startup, but Julian Assange is up for "Best Founder."
Here's the list:
Founder of the Year
Julian Assange, WikiLeaks
Dennis Crowley, Foursquare
Jack Dorsey, Square
Kevin and Julia Hartz, Eventbrite
David Karp, Tumblr
Mark Pincus, Zynga
You can vote for Assange with a click here: VOTE.
The 2011 Crunchies, the annual awards event for the Tech Community produced by TechCrunch, VentureBeat, and Gigaom, is this Friday in San Francisco, and the voting underway (until Wednesday) reveals a nice surprise.
This blogger was the first to openly push for Wikileaks Editor-In-Chief Julian Assange to receive the "Best Startup Award." This for Wikileaks path-breaking impact on World Industrial Culture, showing just how powerful the Internet really is in its ability to rapidly disseminate important information.
Well, Wikileaks isn't up for Best Startup, but Julian Assange is up for "Best Founder."
Here's the list:
Founder of the Year
Julian Assange, WikiLeaks
Dennis Crowley, Foursquare
Jack Dorsey, Square
Kevin and Julia Hartz, Eventbrite
David Karp, Tumblr
Mark Pincus, Zynga
You can vote for Assange with a click here: VOTE.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)