Friday, October 02, 2009

2016 Olympics: Rio wins - Chicago presentation "lacked excitement"

More at | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit

Rio will host the 2016 Olympics; there's a party down there that I wish were up here. Well, time to book tickets for Brazil..

Still examining the emotional wreckage from Chicago's stunning loss - ok, ass kicking - in the competition for the 2016 Olympic games, we find another gem of a editor report: that Chicago's bid lacked excitement and Brazil's President Luiz InĂ¡cio Lula da Silva made a plea that was so impassioned it overtook that from President Obama.

I still think that Mayor Daley comment story held away as it was only one week old, but this take is from the on-the-scene in Denmark editor of, Robert Livingstone, who's really done great work in this area over the years. It's a fresh unvarnished take, and may point to how hard an underdog works, Brazil, when they want to achieve something, in this case the Olympics.

Rio won. Give them credit for a job well done. The Olympics are in Brazil, now that nation's got to deliver and big time.

More on this later - got to catch a flight.

2016 Olympics: Chicago politics; Mayor Daley comments blamed for loss

More at | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit

As I look at the emotional wreckage that is Chicago's stunning loss of the 2016 Olympics, and with Madrid and Rio remaining in the IOC vote competition, the remains reveal that Chicago politics and Chicago Mayor Richard Daley Jr.'s remarks which led to a skirmish with Rio, may have been the factors behind Chicago's first round ballot loss.

According to the Chicago Tribune, Mayor Daley has at first not promised the blanket financial guarantee the IOC wanted, then did a reverse and made such a promise, and the got Chicago alderman to vote for it 46 to 0.

But knowing this game bids issue as I personally do, I really don't think that was the problem. My gut tells me it was the story of Mayor Daley's comments regarding Rio's bid that were taken as an insult by Brazil. According to, the IOC has a rule against rival bidders making derogatory comments about Olympic bids. GameBid reports:

Daley was reported to have said last week that hosting the World Cup, as Brazil will do in 2014, was not the same as hosting the Olympics.

That comment, not officially recorded and appear to be from a single source from my web search, caused Rio to file a complaint with the IOC Ethics Commission.

That happened just last week and I think poisoned the water before the IOC vote. Now the question is did Mayor Daley really say that, or was it a stunt to pull off an upset vote and swing the decision to South America.

I'm thinking it was the latter.

Stay Tuned.

2016 Olympics: STUNNING - Chicago lose in first round of voting

More at | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit

UPDATE: Tokyo eliminated from the Olympics bid

The news is like a brick hitting one on the head. In the 2016 Olympics vote today, it was announced by IOC President Jacques Rogge that Chicago "having received the least amount of votes" was eliminated from the running for the 2016 Olympics.

Forget Obama or anyone else, count me as stunned and disappointed. The bid was considered to be the front-runner, so just what happened I don't know. Politics? Yes.

Or, as my Mom's friend put it, they - the IOC - didn't want Obama to have the victory because he's not "for the rich" and points to the health care issue as an example.

But I don't think that was the case; I think it was media organizations like CNN constantly pushing Chicago's crime problem right before the vote today. CNN should be ashamed.

I really feel bad about this one; it's like rooting for the Cubs in the playoffs. We need to find Steve Bartman.

2016 Olympics: Obama appearance in Copenhagen boosts Chicago's chances for win

More at | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit

UPDATE: Chicago's stunning loss; Mayor Daley to blame?

Twitter updates: on Twitter and on Twitter

Olympic bid Forum: Forum

Today, in just a few hours, the International Olympic Committee will determine which city wins the right to host the 2016 Olympics: Chicago, Tokyo, Rio, Madrid, and Tokyo.

According to, which tracks the progress of Olympic bids, President Obama's decision to appear in Copenhagen and give a speech to the IOC was boosted Chicago's chances for winning. This is part of Obama's speech:'s BidIndex was changed to include Obama's impact, causing Chicago's score to increase to 61.24, just behind the 61.42 for Rio. It's a tight race, but GameBids forgot about Michelle Obama' and this impassioned speech.

Mrs. Obama's speech, focusing on her father, is just beautiful. Really something. I think it's the difference-maker.

This is the first time in Olympic bidding history that both the President of The United States and the First Lady of The United States gave speeches in support of an Olympics bid.

As one born and raised in Chicago for much of my young life, and who has family there, I would love to see "The City With the Big Shoulders" get the Olympics. Chicago teaches one to think big and to see possibilities. That city made me and it never left me even as we moved to Oakland, Ca, which I see as very much like Chicago.

This is Chicago's 2016 Olympics video:

And this is Chicago's presentation in Milan earlier this year:

Moreover, the Summer Olympics are long overdue for a return to America. The last time was 13 years ago in 1996 in Atlanta, and that was a true success. In our poor economy, at this time, it woulc be a massive shot in the self-esteem arm to get the games.

IOC Olympics voting process

According to, this is how the voting process will work:
Each city will give final presentations to the voting International Olympic Committee members. The drawn order of the presentations is Chicago, Tokyo, Rio and Madrid. Each city will have 70 minutes including a period for questions and answers.

Chicago will present at 8:45 AM Tokyo will follow at 10:45 AM. Next is Rio de Janeiro at 12:05 PM, then Madrid at 2:15 PM.

After the presentations, the Evaluation Commission will review their report with the IOC members.

Voting will commence a 5:10 PM local time in Copenhagen - it will be by secret electronic balloting.

Any city requires 50% +1 votes to win a ballot. If no city receives enough votes to win, the bid with the least amount of votes is dropped from the ballot and the remaining cities are added to a new ballot. There could be as many as three ballots.

There are currently 106 IOC members. Members representing countries with a bid city on the ballot may not vote. There are two members from the United States, two from Japan, two from Brazil and one from Spain. These members may vote in subsequent ballots if their city is eliminated.

There is one suspended member who may not vote and the IOC President Jacques Rogge will not vote. In total, there are 97 eligible votes on the first ballot. This number may be reduced if any voters are excused.

If there is a tie vote on he final ballot - the IOC President can cast a tie-breaking vote.

After each ballot the IOC President will announce either that a winner has been declared or he will name the city that is eliminated from the next ballot. After the final ballot, the name of the winning city is sealed until the annoucement ceremony at 6:30 PM local time.

After the announcement, the host city contract signing will folllow at 7:30 PM.

Games good for America

To me, opposing the games for America is just plain un-American, a tag that could rightly be put on conservatives like Glen Beck, Sean Hannity and Michelle Malkin, who really want to see President Obama fail, and would obviously undercut America's best interests to make that happen.

I'm not saying they can't have an opinion, but why go against America when its competing around the World for the Olympics? If Bush was headed over there, they'd be all for the Olympics, and they know it.

You can't claim to love your country and do what they're doing. When it matters most, America needs all hands on deck. Beck, Malkin, and Hannity know nothing of urban planning or public sector economics to make an informed comment about Olympic bids. As one who's formed the bid to bring the 2005 Super Bowl to Oakland, I do. Their opposition is purely political.

Go Chicago! Go USA!