Saturday, October 03, 2009
NFL Changing Of The Guard In 2009? By John Wagner Sr. writer at large Football Reporters Online
NFL Changing Of The Guard In 2009? By John Wagner Sr. writer at large Football Reporters Online
Just three weeks into the 2009 National Football League season, it’s much too soon to draw season-ending conclusions. For proof of that, look no further than just two seasons ago when the 2007 New York Giants were shredded defensively to the tune of allowing 80 points while starting 0-2, before finishing 10-6 and riding a complete defensive turnaround to shut down the NFL’s highest scoring regular offense ever, in a Super Bowl XLII victory.
Still, there are some early signs that the final 2009 NFL standings could look drastically different than they did a year ago.
Only two (the New York Giants and Minnesota Vikings) of last year’s eight division winners thus far are leading those same divisions this year.
And, three teams (Miami, Tennessee, and Carolina) that captured division titles a season ago are each still seeking their first win in 2009.
Last year’s AFC East champions, the Miami Dolphins have run the wildcat successfully enough to rank third in the league in both rushing offense and time of possession, but as we saw in their 27-23 loss to Indianapolis in which the Colts set a league record for having the ball for the least amount of time in a victory, that formula doesn’t necessarily translate to enough points (Miami is averaging just 14.3 per game) or wins (the Dolphins are 0-3). Throw in starting quarterback Chad Pennington’s latest season-ending injury, and Miami might be poised to go from the best turn-around in NFL history (from 1-15 in 2007, to 11-5 last season) right back to where it was two years ago.
The Tennessee Titans meanwhile, have been in every game they’ve played so far this year, and they’ve had some tough-luck losses, two by a field goal (one of those in overtime), and a third by a touchdown. However, last season’s AFC South champions have remarkably gone from the NFL’s best record (13-3) after a 10-0 start in 2008, to already matching last season’s loss total with an 0-3 beginning this year. Tennessee has a lot more talent and thus hope, than Miami, to turn things around, but NFL history has been unkind to 0-3 teams making the playoffs let alone winning a division.
And then there’s the Carolina Panthers, last year’s NFC South champions, also starting this season at 0-3 after going 12-4 a year ago. The Panthers were thoroughly embarrassed against Philadelphia in their 2009 season opener at home, a place where they went a perfect 8-0 in the 2008 regular season… that is until they were upset in a blowout loss to Arizona in last year’s NFC divisional playoff game –- which also marked a sharp turnaround for quarterback Jake Delhomme and the Panthers’ offense. Over Carolina’s last four games, Including last season’s playoff loss plus the Panthers’ first three games in 2009, Carolina has lost as many games (4) and Delhomme has thrown as many interceptions (12) as the Panthers and Delhomme had respectively, throughout the entire 2008 regular season. Carolina has already been outscored by 50 points (87-37), averaging a measly 12.3 point per game this season. That’s a huge departure from the team that was the number two seed in the 2008 NFC playoffs.
Meanwhile, last season’s Super Bowl participants, Pittsburgh and Arizona, the only teams to navigate through their respective divisions with perfect 6-0 records in 2008, are each just 1-2, and each has already lost its first game within its division.
Of course, if some of last year’s division winners are struggling now, there must be others which have stepped up and taken their place, and that’s been the case so far this year in nearly every division in the league.
In the AFC East, the 9-7 Jets of a year ago have begun 3-0 to lead that division on the strength of one of the NFL’s best defenses thus far in 2009.
In the AFC South, the Baltimore Ravens were already good last year, but they fell short to Pittsburgh by a game for the 2008 division title. This year however, they look to be one of the NFL’s most complete teams en route to a division-leading 3-0 record.
A similar situation for Indianapolis in the AFC South. After losing the division by one game to the Titans in 2008, the Colts have again ridden quarterback Peyton Manning’s arm to the top of the AFC South –- for now –- where they sit at 3-0.
And, to round out all AFC divisions with new leaders at 3-0, the undefeated Denver Broncos, albeit against a soft schedule to this point, have played well, allowing an NFL-low 16 points (just 5.3 points per game).
In the NFC, the only stability from last season can be found in the NFC East and in the NFC North.
But, with the Panthers and Cardinals faltering, last season’s 8-8, last place New Orleans Saints look like the NFL’s best team so far in 2009, storming their way to a 3-0 mark, crushing their opponents by a combined 120-56 so far; and the first-place San Francisco 49ers, just 7-9 a year ago, have already won at Arizona this season, and are a Minnesota Miracle pass (a Vikings’ game-winning 32-yard touchdown pass with just :02 left) from also being perfect at 3-0.
There’s a lot of football left, and November and December in the NFL often look a lot different than September. But, so far, it looks like we should be forgetting all about 2008 and possibly getting ready for a lot of new faces as either division winners or at least, playoff contenders, in 2009.
CNN reporting on Chicago crime harmed 2016 Olympic vote
More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, won the right to host the 2016 Olympics, beating Madrid, Tokyo, and most famously Chicago - which stunningly was dropped out of the first round of voting, even with a great bid and a visit from the President of the United States and First Lady Michelle Obama.
Here's the voting tally from GameBids.com:
Ballot 1: (95 eligible, 94 valid ballots)
Madrid - 28
Rio - 26
Tokyo - 22
Chicago -18
Ballot 2: (97 eligible, 1 abstention, 95 valid ballots)
Rio - 46
Madrid - 29
Tokyo - 20
Ballot 3: (99 eligible, 1 abstention, 98 valid ballots)
Rio - 66
Madrid - 32
Rio de Janeiro elected.
What vexes me is CNN's constant drumbeat of reports on Chicago crime - and specifically two teen murders - in the very week before the vote and leading right up to the day of the IOC vote.
It seemed like CNN was trying to influence the vote to me, even mentioning the Olympics in their segments on the Chicago crime problem. Moreover, CNN failed to mention the crime issue in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rio has a huge drug and crime problem called "critical" and puts it in direct competition if not worse than Chicago. With all this why no mention of Rio's crime problem?
CNN is an international news organization with incredible reach and thus can certainly have an impact on how the IOC voting members would see Chicago. But the simple fact that CNN failed to report the drug and crime problem in Rio calls its intentions into question in the wake of America's voting loss.
CNN should explain what it was trying to do and why it did not mention the crime problems of Olympic competitor cities. One could make the argument - I will - that CNN was trying to politically hurt President Obama. Indeed, CNN's actions were irresponsible for a "trusted news source."
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, won the right to host the 2016 Olympics, beating Madrid, Tokyo, and most famously Chicago - which stunningly was dropped out of the first round of voting, even with a great bid and a visit from the President of the United States and First Lady Michelle Obama.
Here's the voting tally from GameBids.com:
Ballot 1: (95 eligible, 94 valid ballots)
Madrid - 28
Rio - 26
Tokyo - 22
Chicago -18
Ballot 2: (97 eligible, 1 abstention, 95 valid ballots)
Rio - 46
Madrid - 29
Tokyo - 20
Ballot 3: (99 eligible, 1 abstention, 98 valid ballots)
Rio - 66
Madrid - 32
Rio de Janeiro elected.
What vexes me is CNN's constant drumbeat of reports on Chicago crime - and specifically two teen murders - in the very week before the vote and leading right up to the day of the IOC vote.
It seemed like CNN was trying to influence the vote to me, even mentioning the Olympics in their segments on the Chicago crime problem. Moreover, CNN failed to mention the crime issue in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rio has a huge drug and crime problem called "critical" and puts it in direct competition if not worse than Chicago. With all this why no mention of Rio's crime problem?
CNN is an international news organization with incredible reach and thus can certainly have an impact on how the IOC voting members would see Chicago. But the simple fact that CNN failed to report the drug and crime problem in Rio calls its intentions into question in the wake of America's voting loss.
CNN should explain what it was trying to do and why it did not mention the crime problems of Olympic competitor cities. One could make the argument - I will - that CNN was trying to politically hurt President Obama. Indeed, CNN's actions were irresponsible for a "trusted news source."
Friday, October 02, 2009
2016 Olympics: Rio wins - Chicago presentation "lacked excitement"
More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com
Rio will host the 2016 Olympics; there's a party down there that I wish were up here. Well, time to book tickets for Brazil..
Still examining the emotional wreckage from Chicago's stunning loss - ok, ass kicking - in the competition for the 2016 Olympic games, we find another gem of a GameBids.com editor report: that Chicago's bid lacked excitement and Brazil's President Luiz InĂ¡cio Lula da Silva made a plea that was so impassioned it overtook that from President Obama.
I still think that Mayor Daley comment story held away as it was only one week old, but this take is from the on-the-scene in Denmark editor of GameBids.com, Robert Livingstone, who's really done great work in this area over the years. It's a fresh unvarnished take, and may point to how hard an underdog works, Brazil, when they want to achieve something, in this case the Olympics.
Rio won. Give them credit for a job well done. The Olympics are in Brazil, now that nation's got to deliver and big time.
More on this later - got to catch a flight.
Rio will host the 2016 Olympics; there's a party down there that I wish were up here. Well, time to book tickets for Brazil..
Still examining the emotional wreckage from Chicago's stunning loss - ok, ass kicking - in the competition for the 2016 Olympic games, we find another gem of a GameBids.com editor report: that Chicago's bid lacked excitement and Brazil's President Luiz InĂ¡cio Lula da Silva made a plea that was so impassioned it overtook that from President Obama.
I still think that Mayor Daley comment story held away as it was only one week old, but this take is from the on-the-scene in Denmark editor of GameBids.com, Robert Livingstone, who's really done great work in this area over the years. It's a fresh unvarnished take, and may point to how hard an underdog works, Brazil, when they want to achieve something, in this case the Olympics.
Rio won. Give them credit for a job well done. The Olympics are in Brazil, now that nation's got to deliver and big time.
More on this later - got to catch a flight.
2016 Olympics: Chicago politics; Mayor Daley comments blamed for loss
More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com
As I look at the emotional wreckage that is Chicago's stunning loss of the 2016 Olympics, and with Madrid and Rio remaining in the IOC vote competition, the remains reveal that Chicago politics and Chicago Mayor Richard Daley Jr.'s remarks which led to a skirmish with Rio, may have been the factors behind Chicago's first round ballot loss.
According to the Chicago Tribune, Mayor Daley has at first not promised the blanket financial guarantee the IOC wanted, then did a reverse and made such a promise, and the got Chicago alderman to vote for it 46 to 0.
But knowing this game bids issue as I personally do, I really don't think that was the problem. My gut tells me it was the story of Mayor Daley's comments regarding Rio's bid that were taken as an insult by Brazil. According to GameBids.com, the IOC has a rule against rival bidders making derogatory comments about Olympic bids. GameBid reports:
That comment, not officially recorded and appear to be from a single source from my web search, caused Rio to file a complaint with the IOC Ethics Commission.
That happened just last week and I think poisoned the water before the IOC vote. Now the question is did Mayor Daley really say that, or was it a stunt to pull off an upset vote and swing the decision to South America.
I'm thinking it was the latter.
Stay Tuned.
As I look at the emotional wreckage that is Chicago's stunning loss of the 2016 Olympics, and with Madrid and Rio remaining in the IOC vote competition, the remains reveal that Chicago politics and Chicago Mayor Richard Daley Jr.'s remarks which led to a skirmish with Rio, may have been the factors behind Chicago's first round ballot loss.
According to the Chicago Tribune, Mayor Daley has at first not promised the blanket financial guarantee the IOC wanted, then did a reverse and made such a promise, and the got Chicago alderman to vote for it 46 to 0.
But knowing this game bids issue as I personally do, I really don't think that was the problem. My gut tells me it was the story of Mayor Daley's comments regarding Rio's bid that were taken as an insult by Brazil. According to GameBids.com, the IOC has a rule against rival bidders making derogatory comments about Olympic bids. GameBid reports:
Daley was reported to have said last week that hosting the World Cup, as Brazil will do in 2014, was not the same as hosting the Olympics.
That comment, not officially recorded and appear to be from a single source from my web search, caused Rio to file a complaint with the IOC Ethics Commission.
That happened just last week and I think poisoned the water before the IOC vote. Now the question is did Mayor Daley really say that, or was it a stunt to pull off an upset vote and swing the decision to South America.
I'm thinking it was the latter.
Stay Tuned.
2016 Olympics: STUNNING - Chicago lose in first round of voting
More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com
UPDATE: Tokyo eliminated from the Olympics bid
The news is like a brick hitting one on the head. In the 2016 Olympics vote today, it was announced by IOC President Jacques Rogge that Chicago "having received the least amount of votes" was eliminated from the running for the 2016 Olympics.
Forget Obama or anyone else, count me as stunned and disappointed. The bid was considered to be the front-runner, so just what happened I don't know. Politics? Yes.
Or, as my Mom's friend put it, they - the IOC - didn't want Obama to have the victory because he's not "for the rich" and points to the health care issue as an example.
But I don't think that was the case; I think it was media organizations like CNN constantly pushing Chicago's crime problem right before the vote today. CNN should be ashamed.
I really feel bad about this one; it's like rooting for the Cubs in the playoffs. We need to find Steve Bartman.
UPDATE: Tokyo eliminated from the Olympics bid
The news is like a brick hitting one on the head. In the 2016 Olympics vote today, it was announced by IOC President Jacques Rogge that Chicago "having received the least amount of votes" was eliminated from the running for the 2016 Olympics.
Forget Obama or anyone else, count me as stunned and disappointed. The bid was considered to be the front-runner, so just what happened I don't know. Politics? Yes.
Or, as my Mom's friend put it, they - the IOC - didn't want Obama to have the victory because he's not "for the rich" and points to the health care issue as an example.
But I don't think that was the case; I think it was media organizations like CNN constantly pushing Chicago's crime problem right before the vote today. CNN should be ashamed.
I really feel bad about this one; it's like rooting for the Cubs in the playoffs. We need to find Steve Bartman.
2016 Olympics: Obama appearance in Copenhagen boosts Chicago's chances for win
More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com
UPDATE: Chicago's stunning loss; Mayor Daley to blame?
Twitter updates: InsideTheGames.biz on Twitter and GameBids.org on Twitter
Olympic bid Forum: GameBids.com Forum
Today, in just a few hours, the International Olympic Committee will determine which city wins the right to host the 2016 Olympics: Chicago, Tokyo, Rio, Madrid, and Tokyo.
According to GameBids.com, which tracks the progress of Olympic bids, President Obama's decision to appear in Copenhagen and give a speech to the IOC was boosted Chicago's chances for winning. This is part of Obama's speech:
GameBids.com's BidIndex was changed to include Obama's impact, causing Chicago's score to increase to 61.24, just behind the 61.42 for Rio. It's a tight race, but GameBids forgot about Michelle Obama' and this impassioned speech.
Mrs. Obama's speech, focusing on her father, is just beautiful. Really something. I think it's the difference-maker.
This is the first time in Olympic bidding history that both the President of The United States and the First Lady of The United States gave speeches in support of an Olympics bid.
As one born and raised in Chicago for much of my young life, and who has family there, I would love to see "The City With the Big Shoulders" get the Olympics. Chicago teaches one to think big and to see possibilities. That city made me and it never left me even as we moved to Oakland, Ca, which I see as very much like Chicago.
This is Chicago's 2016 Olympics video:
And this is Chicago's presentation in Milan earlier this year:
Chicago 2016: Host Presentation
Uploaded by aipsmedia. - Basketball, baseball, pro wrestling and more sports videos.
Moreover, the Summer Olympics are long overdue for a return to America. The last time was 13 years ago in 1996 in Atlanta, and that was a true success. In our poor economy, at this time, it woulc be a massive shot in the self-esteem arm to get the games.
According to GameBids.com, this is how the voting process will work:
To me, opposing the games for America is just plain un-American, a tag that could rightly be put on conservatives like Glen Beck, Sean Hannity and Michelle Malkin, who really want to see President Obama fail, and would obviously undercut America's best interests to make that happen.
I'm not saying they can't have an opinion, but why go against America when its competing around the World for the Olympics? If Bush was headed over there, they'd be all for the Olympics, and they know it.
You can't claim to love your country and do what they're doing. When it matters most, America needs all hands on deck. Beck, Malkin, and Hannity know nothing of urban planning or public sector economics to make an informed comment about Olympic bids. As one who's formed the bid to bring the 2005 Super Bowl to Oakland, I do. Their opposition is purely political.
Go Chicago! Go USA!
UPDATE: Chicago's stunning loss; Mayor Daley to blame?
Twitter updates: InsideTheGames.biz on Twitter and GameBids.org on Twitter
Olympic bid Forum: GameBids.com Forum
Today, in just a few hours, the International Olympic Committee will determine which city wins the right to host the 2016 Olympics: Chicago, Tokyo, Rio, Madrid, and Tokyo.
According to GameBids.com, which tracks the progress of Olympic bids, President Obama's decision to appear in Copenhagen and give a speech to the IOC was boosted Chicago's chances for winning. This is part of Obama's speech:
GameBids.com's BidIndex was changed to include Obama's impact, causing Chicago's score to increase to 61.24, just behind the 61.42 for Rio. It's a tight race, but GameBids forgot about Michelle Obama' and this impassioned speech.
Mrs. Obama's speech, focusing on her father, is just beautiful. Really something. I think it's the difference-maker.
This is the first time in Olympic bidding history that both the President of The United States and the First Lady of The United States gave speeches in support of an Olympics bid.
As one born and raised in Chicago for much of my young life, and who has family there, I would love to see "The City With the Big Shoulders" get the Olympics. Chicago teaches one to think big and to see possibilities. That city made me and it never left me even as we moved to Oakland, Ca, which I see as very much like Chicago.
This is Chicago's 2016 Olympics video:
And this is Chicago's presentation in Milan earlier this year:
Chicago 2016: Host Presentation
Uploaded by aipsmedia. - Basketball, baseball, pro wrestling and more sports videos.
Moreover, the Summer Olympics are long overdue for a return to America. The last time was 13 years ago in 1996 in Atlanta, and that was a true success. In our poor economy, at this time, it woulc be a massive shot in the self-esteem arm to get the games.
IOC Olympics voting process
According to GameBids.com, this is how the voting process will work:
Each city will give final presentations to the voting International Olympic Committee members. The drawn order of the presentations is Chicago, Tokyo, Rio and Madrid. Each city will have 70 minutes including a period for questions and answers.
Chicago will present at 8:45 AM Tokyo will follow at 10:45 AM. Next is Rio de Janeiro at 12:05 PM, then Madrid at 2:15 PM.
After the presentations, the Evaluation Commission will review their report with the IOC members.
Voting will commence a 5:10 PM local time in Copenhagen - it will be by secret electronic balloting.
Any city requires 50% +1 votes to win a ballot. If no city receives enough votes to win, the bid with the least amount of votes is dropped from the ballot and the remaining cities are added to a new ballot. There could be as many as three ballots.
There are currently 106 IOC members. Members representing countries with a bid city on the ballot may not vote. There are two members from the United States, two from Japan, two from Brazil and one from Spain. These members may vote in subsequent ballots if their city is eliminated.
There is one suspended member who may not vote and the IOC President Jacques Rogge will not vote. In total, there are 97 eligible votes on the first ballot. This number may be reduced if any voters are excused.
If there is a tie vote on he final ballot - the IOC President can cast a tie-breaking vote.
After each ballot the IOC President will announce either that a winner has been declared or he will name the city that is eliminated from the next ballot. After the final ballot, the name of the winning city is sealed until the annoucement ceremony at 6:30 PM local time.
After the announcement, the host city contract signing will folllow at 7:30 PM.
Games good for America
To me, opposing the games for America is just plain un-American, a tag that could rightly be put on conservatives like Glen Beck, Sean Hannity and Michelle Malkin, who really want to see President Obama fail, and would obviously undercut America's best interests to make that happen.
I'm not saying they can't have an opinion, but why go against America when its competing around the World for the Olympics? If Bush was headed over there, they'd be all for the Olympics, and they know it.
You can't claim to love your country and do what they're doing. When it matters most, America needs all hands on deck. Beck, Malkin, and Hannity know nothing of urban planning or public sector economics to make an informed comment about Olympic bids. As one who's formed the bid to bring the 2005 Super Bowl to Oakland, I do. Their opposition is purely political.
Go Chicago! Go USA!
Thursday, October 01, 2009
Oakland Raiders vs. Houston Texans Preview - CBS' Pat Kirwan on JaMarcus Russell
More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com
NFL.com and CBS Sports Pat Kirwan knows his football and since we meet at the 2006 NFL Draft..
..I've had a number of personal conversations on everything from Vince Young and the Spread Offense to then-New England Offensive Coordinator and now Denver Broncos' Head Coach Josh McDaniels passing attack. I don't always agree with Pat and today's another example of why.
Pat's views on the upcoming Raiders v. Texans game are below:
Kirwan's comment that the Raiders..
Where I totally disagree with Pat is that he focuses on JaMarcus Russell rather than how he's coached and the design of the passing game. Maybe it's the rule of one coach (as Pat has been) not criticizing another coach, or something. But my issue is with the Raiders passing attack design, which I've discussed before.
In other words, any quarterback would struggle in that system.
I also take issue with Pat's look at the Texans. Pay says they can't stop the pass. The Houston Texans have one problem: they can't stop the run and haven't been able to since preseason which means its a scheme problem. They averaged 5 yards a carry on defenseagainst Jacksonville last Sunday; with stats like that, the Raiders won't have to worry about JaMarcus Russell, they'll just hand off.
My prediction: Raiders 20, Texans 17.
NFL.com and CBS Sports Pat Kirwan knows his football and since we meet at the 2006 NFL Draft..
..I've had a number of personal conversations on everything from Vince Young and the Spread Offense to then-New England Offensive Coordinator and now Denver Broncos' Head Coach Josh McDaniels passing attack. I don't always agree with Pat and today's another example of why.
Pat's views on the upcoming Raiders v. Texans game are below:
Kirwan's comment that the Raiders..
JaMarcus Russell is struggling as much and they're trying to protect him and they're very sensitive about what anyone says about him. But I said as much when I went to camp and I'll say it again, the guy was not making decisions fast enough to have an effective passing attack.
Where I totally disagree with Pat is that he focuses on JaMarcus Russell rather than how he's coached and the design of the passing game. Maybe it's the rule of one coach (as Pat has been) not criticizing another coach, or something. But my issue is with the Raiders passing attack design, which I've discussed before.
In other words, any quarterback would struggle in that system.
I also take issue with Pat's look at the Texans. Pay says they can't stop the pass. The Houston Texans have one problem: they can't stop the run and haven't been able to since preseason which means its a scheme problem. They averaged 5 yards a carry on defenseagainst Jacksonville last Sunday; with stats like that, the Raiders won't have to worry about JaMarcus Russell, they'll just hand off.
My prediction: Raiders 20, Texans 17.
Oakland Raiders vs. Houston Texans Preview - CBS' Pat Kirwan on JaMarcus Russell
More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com
NFL.com and CBS Sports Pat Kirwan knows his football and since we meet at the 2006 NFL Draft..
..I've had a number of personal conversations on everything from Vince Young and the Spread Offense to then-New England Offensive Coordinator and now Denver Broncos' Head Coach Josh McDaniels passing attack. I don't always agree with Pat and today's another example of why.
Pat's views on the upcoming Raiders v. Texans game are below:
Kirwan's comment that the Raiders..
Where I totally disagree with Pat is that he focuses on JaMarcus Russell rather than how he's coached and the design of the passing game. Maybe it's the rule of one coach (as Pat has been) not criticizing another coach, or something. But my issue is with the Raiders passing attack design, which I've discussed before.
In other words, any quarterback would struggle in that system.
I also take issue with Pat's look at the Texans. Pay says they can't stop the pass. The Houston Texans have one problem: they can't stop the run and haven't been able to since preseason which means its a scheme problem. They averaged 5 yards a carry on defenseagainst Jacksonville last Sunday; with stats like that, the Raiders won't have to worry about JaMarcus Russell, they'll just hand off.
My prediction: Raiders 20, Texans 17.
NFL.com and CBS Sports Pat Kirwan knows his football and since we meet at the 2006 NFL Draft..
..I've had a number of personal conversations on everything from Vince Young and the Spread Offense to then-New England Offensive Coordinator and now Denver Broncos' Head Coach Josh McDaniels passing attack. I don't always agree with Pat and today's another example of why.
Pat's views on the upcoming Raiders v. Texans game are below:
Kirwan's comment that the Raiders..
JaMarcus Russell is struggling as much and they're trying to protect him and they're very sensitive about what anyone says about him. But I said as much when I went to camp and I'll say it again, the guy was not making decisions fast enough to have an effective passing attack.
Where I totally disagree with Pat is that he focuses on JaMarcus Russell rather than how he's coached and the design of the passing game. Maybe it's the rule of one coach (as Pat has been) not criticizing another coach, or something. But my issue is with the Raiders passing attack design, which I've discussed before.
In other words, any quarterback would struggle in that system.
I also take issue with Pat's look at the Texans. Pay says they can't stop the pass. The Houston Texans have one problem: they can't stop the run and haven't been able to since preseason which means its a scheme problem. They averaged 5 yards a carry on defenseagainst Jacksonville last Sunday; with stats like that, the Raiders won't have to worry about JaMarcus Russell, they'll just hand off.
My prediction: Raiders 20, Texans 17.
White supremacist forum "Stormfront" discovers Zennie
More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com
The blog post I wrote called "Jimmy Carter's right; White Nationalists taking over the GOP" has got the attention of the famous white supremacist forum called "Stormfront".
When I put the link in the context of some of the comments that come to my email from my YouTube video, it's actually tolerable. But overall, concerns some express about "illegal immigrants" are sad and silly, because they use the term "illegal immigrant" as a racial code word for anyone Latino.
Here's my comment example from my video at YouTube.com:
By contrast, the reality is "illegal immigrants" come in all shapes and sizes and are just a marriage proposal away from being legal. Well that's oversimplifying things but you get what I mean. The commenter uses the term "border jumping peasants" which obviously excludes waiters and waitresses from Ireland.
Geez.
Now, what's "Stormfront", you ask? The website description reads "Discussion board for pro-White activists and anyone else interested in White survival". What's interesting is I could not find an equivalent when I took out the word "white" and replaced it with "black" in Google. But that's beside the point.
Stormfront started in 1990 as an online bulletin Board for David Duke when he ran for U.S. Senator of Louisiana (he lost). It's grown since then to become the 249th largest forum online with over 6 million posts according to Big-Boards.com.
Now that doesn't mean 6 million people are posting to the site but it means there are a small but active set of people who have the idea that "white rights" are being harmed for some reason. I think they're misguided.
For example someone wrote that they stood for the end of "white discrimination"; well that person should be interested in the end of discrimination, period.
I point to Stormfront because its something you need to be aware of. Fox News Bill O'Reilly said it best in 2003 in response to the Georgia racially divided prom issue:
Bill's right. Not being aware of a group that has as its goal racial separation and it seems by some harm, is to allow that group to grow and to commit criminal acts of racial discrimination and hate. That some people have been brainwashed to think in the way that Stormfront presents shows how terrible America's education system has become and how America has not activity had diversity training in schools.
As a result, we have some people who are so isolated from others based on skin color it's given them a psychotic view of the World.
The simple, inescapable reality is that there's no one purely white or black; we're all mixed together to some degree. Looking at the world purely through a white or black lens is silly and rather sick.
Now that's different from pointing out how racism is done, which I do. You have to identify who's who racially to do that, but it doesn't mean the persons are "all" white, black, Asian, or Latino.
To me, racial divisions are silly. It's why I never joined the Black Student Union at Skyline High or Brett Harte Junior High in Oakland. It's why I co-created our Star Trek Club when I was 14...
...and why I didn't want to be in a fraternity that was all-black in college. I believed then as I do now that in order to properly function in the World, one can't shield themselves off from society and become something akin to an anti-government wacko.
Moreover, I didn't want to be in a frat that was all white either, even though such organizations don't call themselves "white fraternities." The bottom line is I like organizations that have diverse memberships and seek to build a diverse population. Life's more fun than the other way.
Think about it. A person who's white and always been around whites will have a hard time in a mostly-black room. The anxiety created would be a product of their own mind, especially if someone took a "shining" to them, as they say. But if they had a racially diverse set of friends, that anxiety would not appear and race would not be a source of discomfort. And that's true for anyone.
I am proud that I can go anywhere and be myself.
It's not that I don't see the historic need for black frats - I do. There was a time when we were not allowed to assemble with whites, let alone ourselves. Blacks have needed a place to go as a minority in America to be able to connect with those who have similar experiences, and that's true today; thus the value of the black frat.
And I support anyone who wants to join a black frat; I just think in this day and age whites and others should be encouraged to join a black fraternity as well, just as I'm invited to join an Italian men's club. It's good for society, and hey, it's good for business too. Especially the flow of commerce.
But the bottom line is racial separatists need to wake up and change with the world around them. American diversity is the norm now, and anyone who has friendships that are all one color is looked at as weird, even if the people doing the looking don't say anything.
It's what I've tried to tell anyone who would listen: the real America, the one that elected Barack Obama as President, is more diverse and desiring to be such than the mainstream media or Stormfront presents.
If you want to see the real America, watch Bravo, Current TV, CoLoursTV (where my TV show is) or MTV. It's no surprise that those networks have some of the hottest and most innovative programs around. They're the new cross-section of a racially mixed America.
It's about time!
The blog post I wrote called "Jimmy Carter's right; White Nationalists taking over the GOP" has got the attention of the famous white supremacist forum called "Stormfront".
When I put the link in the context of some of the comments that come to my email from my YouTube video, it's actually tolerable. But overall, concerns some express about "illegal immigrants" are sad and silly, because they use the term "illegal immigrant" as a racial code word for anyone Latino.
Here's my comment example from my video at YouTube.com:
I'm sure the dumbass in this video supports amnesty for illegals - he follows the party line like a trained monkey. And yet he says, "we need to fix this economy". Well, it might help if we didn't have millions of border jumping peasants sucking up millions of service industry, manufacturing, & assembly jobs.
By contrast, the reality is "illegal immigrants" come in all shapes and sizes and are just a marriage proposal away from being legal. Well that's oversimplifying things but you get what I mean. The commenter uses the term "border jumping peasants" which obviously excludes waiters and waitresses from Ireland.
Geez.
Now, what's "Stormfront", you ask? The website description reads "Discussion board for pro-White activists and anyone else interested in White survival". What's interesting is I could not find an equivalent when I took out the word "white" and replaced it with "black" in Google. But that's beside the point.
Stormfront started in 1990 as an online bulletin Board for David Duke when he ran for U.S. Senator of Louisiana (he lost). It's grown since then to become the 249th largest forum online with over 6 million posts according to Big-Boards.com.
Now that doesn't mean 6 million people are posting to the site but it means there are a small but active set of people who have the idea that "white rights" are being harmed for some reason. I think they're misguided.
For example someone wrote that they stood for the end of "white discrimination"; well that person should be interested in the end of discrimination, period.
I point to Stormfront because its something you need to be aware of. Fox News Bill O'Reilly said it best in 2003 in response to the Georgia racially divided prom issue:
Now, the fact that this white supremacist group is taking such an interest in the prom situation says a lot and should also be a danger sign to those of you who don't see the problem here.
Bill's right. Not being aware of a group that has as its goal racial separation and it seems by some harm, is to allow that group to grow and to commit criminal acts of racial discrimination and hate. That some people have been brainwashed to think in the way that Stormfront presents shows how terrible America's education system has become and how America has not activity had diversity training in schools.
As a result, we have some people who are so isolated from others based on skin color it's given them a psychotic view of the World.
The simple, inescapable reality is that there's no one purely white or black; we're all mixed together to some degree. Looking at the world purely through a white or black lens is silly and rather sick.
Now that's different from pointing out how racism is done, which I do. You have to identify who's who racially to do that, but it doesn't mean the persons are "all" white, black, Asian, or Latino.
To me, racial divisions are silly. It's why I never joined the Black Student Union at Skyline High or Brett Harte Junior High in Oakland. It's why I co-created our Star Trek Club when I was 14...
I'm gonna make Lars famous!
...and why I didn't want to be in a fraternity that was all-black in college. I believed then as I do now that in order to properly function in the World, one can't shield themselves off from society and become something akin to an anti-government wacko.
Moreover, I didn't want to be in a frat that was all white either, even though such organizations don't call themselves "white fraternities." The bottom line is I like organizations that have diverse memberships and seek to build a diverse population. Life's more fun than the other way.
Think about it. A person who's white and always been around whites will have a hard time in a mostly-black room. The anxiety created would be a product of their own mind, especially if someone took a "shining" to them, as they say. But if they had a racially diverse set of friends, that anxiety would not appear and race would not be a source of discomfort. And that's true for anyone.
I am proud that I can go anywhere and be myself.
It's not that I don't see the historic need for black frats - I do. There was a time when we were not allowed to assemble with whites, let alone ourselves. Blacks have needed a place to go as a minority in America to be able to connect with those who have similar experiences, and that's true today; thus the value of the black frat.
And I support anyone who wants to join a black frat; I just think in this day and age whites and others should be encouraged to join a black fraternity as well, just as I'm invited to join an Italian men's club. It's good for society, and hey, it's good for business too. Especially the flow of commerce.
But the bottom line is racial separatists need to wake up and change with the world around them. American diversity is the norm now, and anyone who has friendships that are all one color is looked at as weird, even if the people doing the looking don't say anything.
It's what I've tried to tell anyone who would listen: the real America, the one that elected Barack Obama as President, is more diverse and desiring to be such than the mainstream media or Stormfront presents.
If you want to see the real America, watch Bravo, Current TV, CoLoursTV (where my TV show is) or MTV. It's no surprise that those networks have some of the hottest and most innovative programs around. They're the new cross-section of a racially mixed America.
It's about time!
Tom Hayes - Obama's Denmark trip is much bigger than Chicago
We've embarked on a "War on Terrorism" that doesn't have fronts on a map, or massed armies. Fighting to win means engaging in ways that win the hearts and minds of people half-way 'round the world from us, people who listen to neither Jon Stewart nor the Fox network to inform their opinions of the USA.
Foreign policy:
All our military strength and intelligence gathering wasn't enough to stop the terrorist attacks in 2001.
Thomas Hayes is an entrepreneur, journalist, and political analyst who contributes regularly to a host of web sites on topics ranging from economics and politics to culture and community.
Foreign policy:
more than insuring oil supplies and limiting nuclear proliferation.
All our military strength and intelligence gathering wasn't enough to stop the terrorist attacks in 2001."It's easy to assume the Obamas connections to Chicago are driving their interest, but the reality is they're using that obvious familiarity to the advantage of our entire country in this case.The reason Tokyo, Rio, and Madrid are still in the hunt for the summer Olympic bid for that year is that world opinion matters, and hosting the Olympic games boosts any country's image.
Plain and simply, this is a great chance to put our American principles on display, and it's just a fortunate coincidence that the President and First Lady have personal ties to the only U.S. city in the running for the 2016 games."
Thomas Hayes is an entrepreneur, journalist, and political analyst who contributes regularly to a host of web sites on topics ranging from economics and politics to culture and community.
Read more...
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Fox News uses blondes, sex, Glen Beck, Bill O'Reilly, and car chases to win cable ratings
More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com
Lost in all of the hullabaloo over Glen Beck calling Barack Obama racist (then famously saying Obama was better than McCain would have been as president),was the fact that all of this attention given to Beck would cause people to tune in to see what he said, even as advertisers were pulling away from him.
It's that and a still-healthy dose of leggy blondes that caused Fox News to dominate cable news. Ever see all the hotties Fox lined up over the past few years? Here's a look:
And if you've got an issue with my use of the term all the hotties, it's your complaining about it that produces the buzz that keeps it going. That's Fox's formula, to be the itch that you want to scratch. It's a method that goes all the way back to P.T. Barnum.
Barnum, the creator of the circus that grew to be the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus, was known for a saying: "There's a sucker born every minute" and even though his competitor actually said it, that's something Fox News figured out a long time ago.
(Barnum was also known for his enjoyment of whatever publicity he could get, a school I subscribe too!)
The sucker is the American public with its weird duality of watching most what it claims to hate the greatest. I often watch in horror as Keith Olbermann spends much of his time talking about what Fox News anchors said (thereby giving you a reason to watch Fox), while Fox hardly mentions anyone from MSNBC.
It's as if MSNBC is actually selling Fox News by, er, talking about them to death - the death of MSNBC News if it doesn't alter its approach.
The other element fueling Fox News'ratings is its conservative leanings and a bit of a nod to white nationalists from time to time. Then there's those LA car chases..
Fox News is the only cable news network that's obsessed with these stupid car chases, but you know what, people watch them. Actually call each other to have friends flip the channel. I've seen this time after time at the gym, when a group of people will crowd around a TV watching a Fox News' car chase, always in LA.
Makes me wonder if they're staged. But whatever, it works.
For the third quarter of 2009, Fox News averaged 2.25 million total viewers in prime time, up two percent over 2008 which was a political primary year. That's more than CNN at 946,000 and down 30 percent over 2008, and MSNBC at 788,000 and down 10 percent over 2008 combined.
Here's the data from DocStat:
3Q '09 _LIVE+SD_ P2+ ranker -
What should CNN and MSNBC do? Well, for CNN, being an iReporter, I have an answer I told them while I was visiting and my video gives a clue:
The idea is to really emphasize the iReports that are sent in. People love to see themselves and the iReport was at its best when CNN was liberally integrating videos into its news format. CNN needs to up the ante there, and create a kind of current-tv-like web system and regular iReport shows.
That would do it. Well, that and putting Campbell Brown in a shorter skirt.
As for MSNBC, I'd include more of a web-based news presence and also copy what CNN's doing with iReport. For all of its liberal politics, MSNBC has an "old school" feel to it, that makes it down right boring at times. Taking out David Gregory and putting in Rachel Maddow for "Meet The Press on Prime Time" would be a kick-ass challenger for Bill O'Reilly.
The bottom line is CNN and MSNBC need to think out of the box, before its too late.
Lost in all of the hullabaloo over Glen Beck calling Barack Obama racist (then famously saying Obama was better than McCain would have been as president),was the fact that all of this attention given to Beck would cause people to tune in to see what he said, even as advertisers were pulling away from him.
It's that and a still-healthy dose of leggy blondes that caused Fox News to dominate cable news. Ever see all the hotties Fox lined up over the past few years? Here's a look:
And if you've got an issue with my use of the term all the hotties, it's your complaining about it that produces the buzz that keeps it going. That's Fox's formula, to be the itch that you want to scratch. It's a method that goes all the way back to P.T. Barnum.
Barnum, the creator of the circus that grew to be the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus, was known for a saying: "There's a sucker born every minute" and even though his competitor actually said it, that's something Fox News figured out a long time ago.
(Barnum was also known for his enjoyment of whatever publicity he could get, a school I subscribe too!)
The sucker is the American public with its weird duality of watching most what it claims to hate the greatest. I often watch in horror as Keith Olbermann spends much of his time talking about what Fox News anchors said (thereby giving you a reason to watch Fox), while Fox hardly mentions anyone from MSNBC.
It's as if MSNBC is actually selling Fox News by, er, talking about them to death - the death of MSNBC News if it doesn't alter its approach.
The other element fueling Fox News'ratings is its conservative leanings and a bit of a nod to white nationalists from time to time. Then there's those LA car chases..
Fox News is the only cable news network that's obsessed with these stupid car chases, but you know what, people watch them. Actually call each other to have friends flip the channel. I've seen this time after time at the gym, when a group of people will crowd around a TV watching a Fox News' car chase, always in LA.
Makes me wonder if they're staged. But whatever, it works.
For the third quarter of 2009, Fox News averaged 2.25 million total viewers in prime time, up two percent over 2008 which was a political primary year. That's more than CNN at 946,000 and down 30 percent over 2008, and MSNBC at 788,000 and down 10 percent over 2008 combined.
Here's the data from DocStat:
3Q '09 _LIVE+SD_ P2+ ranker -
What should CNN and MSNBC do? Well, for CNN, being an iReporter, I have an answer I told them while I was visiting and my video gives a clue:
The idea is to really emphasize the iReports that are sent in. People love to see themselves and the iReport was at its best when CNN was liberally integrating videos into its news format. CNN needs to up the ante there, and create a kind of current-tv-like web system and regular iReport shows.
That would do it. Well, that and putting Campbell Brown in a shorter skirt.
As for MSNBC, I'd include more of a web-based news presence and also copy what CNN's doing with iReport. For all of its liberal politics, MSNBC has an "old school" feel to it, that makes it down right boring at times. Taking out David Gregory and putting in Rachel Maddow for "Meet The Press on Prime Time" would be a kick-ass challenger for Bill O'Reilly.
The bottom line is CNN and MSNBC need to think out of the box, before its too late.
“FRO’s Favorite Five” Frankie’s Favorite Fantasy Picks Week 4
“FRO’s Favorite Five”
Frankie’s Favorite Fantasy Picks
Week 4
By Frankie Underwood
Sr. Fantasy Football Writer-Football Reporters Online
Carson Palmer stays in state to face the lowly Cleveland Browns. This should be great for Palmers stats. Last weekend Cleveland gave up nearly 350 yards to second year Ravens QB Joe Flacco, and 260 to Denver’s Kyle Orton, the week before. Palmer’s had low yardage totals so far this season and is coming off a huge win against division rival and the reigning Super Bowl champion Pittsburg Steelers. After that big win this game against the winless Browns could turn into a trap game, but I believe Palmer and the Cincinnati Bengals can put the past behind them and take care of business in Cleveland. I actually thought about recommending Trent Edwards again this week since he has a very nice match up against the Miami Dolphins, but thought I’d just mention it in pacing in case he lets me down again.
I selected Oakland’s Darren McFadden for my week two Favorite Five, and here he is again. Houston has been torched by running back this season. In week one Thomas Jones dropped 107 on them. Then in week two Chris Johnson broke two long runs for touchdowns and totaled 197 rushing yards not to mention a 90 yard plus touchdown reception. Finally this past weekend Maurice Jones-Drew scored three touchdowns and 119 rushing yards. As long as Oakland can stay in the game, McFadden should be a large part of the Oakland offense. Houston’s Steve Slaton in also a nice play since Oakland can not cover the run.
Who is the number one reliever in Chicago? If I run the team I’d start Earl Bennett and Johnny Knox and use Devin Hester as the third therefore freeing him up to be the full time punt and kick returner, maybe run him out of the victory formation as a desperation play (you can email me for further explanation of that idea). Well since I do not run the team and Hester is the so-called number one receiver, I look for him to have a nice game against the Detroit Lions. Santana Moss, a similar yet extensively more experienced receiver, put up 178 yards in a loss to the Lions on Sunday. Also Percy Harvin, again with a similar skill set, scored against them in week two. Chicago Bears QB Jay Cutler should attempt to force feed Hester the ball, and depending on how banged up RB Matt Forte is Hester may see some rushing attempts to go with his returns and receptions. Third receiver Johnny Knox should also be considered this weekend.
If you are still holding on to an Oakland Raider besides McFadden, hopefully it is tight end Zach Miller. This may be the weekend that Miller lives up to his off season billing as a top twelve TE. As have I stated before Houston can not cover tight ends, add this to the fact that Oakland QB JaMarcus Russell can not seem to find his wide receivers, and it should equal a big day for Miller. Whether coming from behind or dumping off because of pressure, Miller and McFadden should both be heavily depended on this weekend. By The Way, keep an eye on the Green Bay Packers Jermichael Finley Monday night in Minnesota.
Although their team has been decimated by injuries, The Buffalo Bills defense could emerge as a nice desperation play. The Bills will face a Miami Dolphins team that just lost QB Chad Pennington, and will be starting a new era behind Chad Henne. Buffalo should pester an inexperienced Henne with multiple blitzes, which will lead to sacks and interceptions. The San Francisco 49ers is also a defense worth starting this weekend.
Last Weeks Favorite Five
Trent Edwards - Don’t get much more of a bust than that.
Tashard Choice – Touchdown and decent yardage, That’s average but he gives you a couple more games worth or use
Josh Cribbs – Again, BUST!!! Sorry
Vernon Davis – I’d say I nailed that one, 96 yards and 2 TDs!!!
Green Bay Packers – 3 turnovers and one Sack, I guess that’s an OK day.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)