Protests against the Iran Government have led to eight deaths, including reportedly the nephew of presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi.
Iranian police allegedly shot Ali Mousavi in the head during protests in Enghelab Square in Tehran , according to The Sydney Morning Herald. Here's video posted on YouTube at Iranprotest channel:
=
Stay tuned.
Monday, December 28, 2009
JFK and Ted Kennedy on a yacht with naked sexy women?
Did President John F. Kennedy and Ted Kennedy hang out on a yacht with a bevy of naked women - topless and bottomless - in August of 1956? And if so, why wasn't the photo discovered until now?
This photo:
In perhaps its most incredible find yet, TMZ.com has revealed a photo that, if universally confirmed, could have altered the course of World History.
The photo allegedly shows John F. Kennedy catching some rays on a yacht (he's said to be on the left) while above and around him are naked women. Some of them are skinny-dipping; others lounging. It looks like Hugh Hefner's Playboy dream. TMZ also links the photo to reported accounts that then-Senator JFK and his brother Ted Kennedy and Senator George Smathers had taken a two-week Mediterraneanboat boating trip where they reportedly entertained a number of women.
But is it real? TMZ.com claims it is:
TMZ.com claims that they got the photo from the son of a "man who owned a car dealership on the East Coast" who would brag about it. But here are my questions: first, who took the photo? Second, how did they come to be in position to take it? Third, how did such a controversial photo lay undiscovered for so long? Fourth, who was really on the boat? Fifth, if it's real, who was instrumental in arranging for it not to be discovered.
I'm sure you can think of even more questions than I've offered.
Stay tuned.
This photo:
Courtesy of TMZ.com
In perhaps its most incredible find yet, TMZ.com has revealed a photo that, if universally confirmed, could have altered the course of World History.
The photo allegedly shows John F. Kennedy catching some rays on a yacht (he's said to be on the left) while above and around him are naked women. Some of them are skinny-dipping; others lounging. It looks like Hugh Hefner's Playboy dream. TMZ also links the photo to reported accounts that then-Senator JFK and his brother Ted Kennedy and Senator George Smathers had taken a two-week Mediterraneanboat boating trip where they reportedly entertained a number of women.
But is it real? TMZ.com claims it is:
TMZ had multiple experts examine the photo -- all say there is no evidence the picture was Photoshopped. The original print -- which is creased -- was scanned and examined for evidence of inconsistent lighting, photo composition and other forms of manipulation. The experts all concluded the photo appears authentic.
Professor Jeff Sedlik, a forensic photo expert, says the print appears to be authentic. Sedlik says the photo is printed on paper consistent with what was used in the 1950s. The emulsion on the surface of the print has numerous cracks -- the result of aging and handling....
Forensic analyst Sedlik superimposed an image of Kennedy taken at the Democratic National Convention in August 1956, just days before Kennedy went on the Mediterranean cruise. Sedlik says the features from the two pics almost precisely sync up. TMZ has also had two Kennedy biographers examine the photo -- they also believe JFK is in the picture.
TMZ.com claims that they got the photo from the son of a "man who owned a car dealership on the East Coast" who would brag about it. But here are my questions: first, who took the photo? Second, how did they come to be in position to take it? Third, how did such a controversial photo lay undiscovered for so long? Fourth, who was really on the boat? Fifth, if it's real, who was instrumental in arranging for it not to be discovered.
I'm sure you can think of even more questions than I've offered.
Stay tuned.
Max Baucus not drunk on Senate Floor - war of words
The issue of Max Baucus not drunk on Senate Floor is turning into a war of words pitting "Max Baucus not drunk on Senate Floor" forces versus "Max Baucus drunk on Senate Floor" believers.
Senator Max Baucus (D - Montana) had launched a spirited debate against Mississippi Senator Roger Wicker on Heath Care Reform. In the process, his tired, angry, articulate tirade was such that online Conservatives activists elected to make a charge that Max Baucus was drunk.
The fact is that Max Baucus was not drunk and correct in his attack against Republicans who did not break ranks to join Democrats in backing Health Care Reform. Rightpundits explains that Baucus' "core argument is that those who oppose healthcare reform are somehow lacking courage.."
Baucus is right for a very basic reason.
We've had the same Health Care System for 60 years and over 30 million Americans are without insurance. It, by nature of what it takes to mount a change to a culture takes courage to do so.
We have line after line of scores of Americans who line up in support of Heath Care Reform because we need a better system. The Republicans have only opposed what Democrats have developed and not came up with a better system themselves. In this the Republicans are not only the "Party of no" but the "Party of lazy".
It takes significant brain work to really sit down and crunch the numbers, craft the legislation, and think about and simulate its impact, then go back to the drawing board. There's just no evidence that the Republican Party has done that.
Every time Republicans are in power, nothing is done to significantly improve and change the Health Care System so we don't have the access problem.
Nothing.
So Max Baucus was right. It does take courage to support change. And Max Baucus wasn't drunk.
Sunday, December 27, 2009
Senator Max Baucus not drunk on Senate Floor
There's a video going around that claims Montana Senator Max Baucus is drunk on the floor of The Senate as he spiritedly takes on Mississippi Senator Roger Wicker in a talk about Health Care Reform.
Senator Max Baucus (D-Montana)
In fact, the video that started the Conservative's nasty attack on Baucus is from Think Progress, which pointed to Baucus' articulate claims of Republican partisanship"
I want to tell the Senator that that is not what happened. I was in the room constantly, constantly. I talked to those Senators many many times. That is not what happened. I”ll tell you what did happen. Your leadership pressured them, pressured them, pressured them not to work together. There is no European style effort in that room, that is a totally untruthful statement. Totally untruthful statement. None whatsoever….That assertion of working towards a European solution is entirely untrue. It’s entirely false.
Now, if you can read that, and you can, then you have to agree Baucus was not "slurring" or "drunk" , or "slobbering" when he was speaking. Otherwise he could not have got off such a great blast against Wicker.
And Conservatives know it.
Rather, Baucus was just plain tired and really angry. The product of long hours of debate against Republicans who just don't play fair at all.
Baucus made a great point. People like Maine's Republican Senator Olympia Snowe were really interested in passing health care reform, but were relentlessly pressured into not doing so. Personally, I think they're on the wrong side of history.
Stay tuned.
Does Janet Napolitano own the Oakland Raiders?
Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano was on CNN this morning and said that "The traveling public - and this is my message for you, Candy - The traveling public is very, very safe in this air environment. And while we continue to investigate the source of this incident, I think the traveling public should be confident in what we're doing now."
That was a mistake. Does Janet Napolitano own the Oakland Raiders? Is she invisible to what happened or is she talking about "The Greatness of The Raiders" in the wake of six straight losing seasons? (And the Oakland Raiders lost to the Cleveland Browns today, 23 to 9.)
My issue with what Secretary Napolitano said is that she didn't use words that acknowledge what happened. What she should have said is "There has been a security breach that we will close. We will work to make you safer." Or words like that.
The reality is the people on Northwest Flight 253 were safe in this case because of other passengers, not primarily due to the Federal Government.
Just something that continues the Obama Administration's objective of open, honest, no-spin communication where issues of national security are not being shared.
Now, President Obama must take time to make a public statement if only to set the Nation at ease about what's happened: two problems with "disruptive passengers" in three days, one labeled a terrorist.
Stay tuned.
Rachael Ray racy sexy photos? Sex symbol? What?
This is crazy! Rachael Ray has racy sexy photos? She's a sex Symbol? What? When I think of Rachael Ray, I think of food, not sex. But apparently, Rachael did a photo shoot for FHM Magazine in 2003 in next to nothing, and her racy images have resurfaced in FHM's 100 Sexiest Women 2009 Edition. Unfortunately, she's not in the Top 10, but given the buzz created by her publicist, she should be. She's ranked 100.
The Top 100 ranked list features in no particular order Hilary Duff, Megan Fox (number one), Kate Hudson, Evangeline Lilly, Elisha Cuthbert, Adriana Lima, Vanessa Hudgens, Diora Baird, Lindsay Lohan, Madeline Zima, Ashley Tisdale, Iron Man 2's Scarlett Johansson, Heidi Montag, Frieda Pinto, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Anne Hathaway, Liv Tyler, and Anna Faris.
In March 2009, Rachael Ray said she'd do the whole thing again, even with the controversy it sparked for her at the time. Even her mother took issue with her decision.
But once again, the photos and the buzz they create show that for women in fashion and media, sex sells. It's an important aspect in the development of a "Q-Rating". Some take extreme measures of expression, using sex tapes, others racy photos, but the formula of getting one noticed works. What separates the success of one actress or model from the other is what the person does with that platform.
For example, even with all of her fame, Former Miss California Carrie Prejean is not on the list.
Politics? I think so. It's obvious Carrie's being punished for her recent behavior. I still think had she carried herself with a quiet dignity on CNN's Larry King Live, she would have gotten a second wind in pop-culture.
Stay tuned.
Charlie Sheen update - Charlie and Brooke Mueller Sheen get counseling
This Charlie Sheen update. According to People Magazine, Charlie and Brooke Mueller Sheen are to get marriage counseling.
Wow.
A quick recap if you don't know the story. Charlie Sheen was arrested and placed in the Pitkin, County Jail in Aspen, Colorado on Christmas morning after having been charged with, according to the Aspen Times, a class-four felony charge of second-degree assault and a class-five felony charge of menacing. He was also charged with a misdemeanor count of what is called "criminal mischief."
District Judge James Boyd presided over a hearing called Friday, Christmas night. The Judge issued a mandatory protection order against Sheen; he can't have contact with Brooke Mueller Sheen. He posted bond, set at $8,500 and was released.
Charlie Sheen and Brooke Mueller Sheen
According to TMZ.com, Brooke Mueller Sheen was legally drunk at the time she called 911 to report that Charlie allegedly attacked her. Then Brooke Mueller Sheen recanted the story of her 911 call. On Saturday, she rejected the re-interview request of the Aspen, Colorado Police Department.
Now they're talking marriage counseling. But the other problem is if Brooke Mueller Sheen filed a false report, it's likely Aspen, Colorado law enforcement would file charges against her.
Stay tuned.
Ann Marie Cox is top blogger on Bing - but no blog!
You know what gets me? How some people in media new and old really play fast-and-loose with the truth. Take Bing x-Rank. In fact, you should.
Bing x-Rank has a listing for "top bloggers", which caught my attention for obvious reasons. TBing x-Rank lists the following bloggers in the order presented (as of this writing):
Gizmodo
Michelle Malkin
Perez Hilton
Aaron Gleeman
Alex Ross
Ally Carter
Ana Marie Cox
Andrew Keen
Andy Stern
Arianna…
Huffington.
Ok. Now, one would expect some kind of ranking system, right? One would also think each blogger had a blog they were editing or at least writing on, right?
So it was interesting to me that Ana Marie Cox, who's certainly a legendary blogger in history, was listed as a "top blogger" without any numerical data to defend the choice for a person who's not with the blog she's listed as writing for!
Wonkette.
Yes, she's the founder, but I mean everyone knows it's not her blog anymore and she's not writing on it. Ana Marie will tell you herself she's a "Wonkette emerita". She's tops on Twitter - in part because someone at Twitter put her on their "Suggested Users" list, which caused her follower count to just zoom.
For that reason, in part, Twitter's "Suggested Users List" is no more.
Now I'm not picking on Ana Marie Cox - this could have been true for any blogger who did not have an active blog. (In fact, note that I'm not picking on Michelle Malkin, ok?) When I see "top bloggers" I don't expect a list just made up from the whim of the web master, even if it's Bill Gates.
Especially if it's Bill Gates.
I expect to see a numbers graph. I expect to see displayed traffic measures.
Think about this. Some of the people responsible for this arbitrary selection would be the first to say they're not biased at all. Yes, I'm going there. I'm pretty hot about this. In New Media the idea is for the best or top of whatever to get their because they have measurable traffic and readership. When the numbers change, the blogger's ranking changes. Right?
Keep prejudices out of it.
This display of arbitrary selection of "top bloggers" on the part of Bing is no better than it was over at Twitter.
It's really got to stop.
Bing x-Rank has a listing for "top bloggers", which caught my attention for obvious reasons. TBing x-Rank lists the following bloggers in the order presented (as of this writing):
Gizmodo
Michelle Malkin
Perez Hilton
Aaron Gleeman
Alex Ross
Ally Carter
Ana Marie Cox
Andrew Keen
Andy Stern
Arianna…
Huffington.
Ok. Now, one would expect some kind of ranking system, right? One would also think each blogger had a blog they were editing or at least writing on, right?
So it was interesting to me that Ana Marie Cox, who's certainly a legendary blogger in history, was listed as a "top blogger" without any numerical data to defend the choice for a person who's not with the blog she's listed as writing for!
Wonkette.
Yes, she's the founder, but I mean everyone knows it's not her blog anymore and she's not writing on it. Ana Marie will tell you herself she's a "Wonkette emerita". She's tops on Twitter - in part because someone at Twitter put her on their "Suggested Users" list, which caused her follower count to just zoom.
For that reason, in part, Twitter's "Suggested Users List" is no more.
Now I'm not picking on Ana Marie Cox - this could have been true for any blogger who did not have an active blog. (In fact, note that I'm not picking on Michelle Malkin, ok?) When I see "top bloggers" I don't expect a list just made up from the whim of the web master, even if it's Bill Gates.
Especially if it's Bill Gates.
I expect to see a numbers graph. I expect to see displayed traffic measures.
Think about this. Some of the people responsible for this arbitrary selection would be the first to say they're not biased at all. Yes, I'm going there. I'm pretty hot about this. In New Media the idea is for the best or top of whatever to get their because they have measurable traffic and readership. When the numbers change, the blogger's ranking changes. Right?
Keep prejudices out of it.
This display of arbitrary selection of "top bloggers" on the part of Bing is no better than it was over at Twitter.
It's really got to stop.
Emerald Bowl - USC tops Boston College with officials help
Yes, USC beat Boston Collage 24-13 in the Emerald Bowl in San Francisco, but I've got to believe something really awful in media's going on when the mainstream press doesn't point out the obviously really questionable calls in this game, and it takes a blog like The Bleacher Report to tell it like it is:
Why is Google allowing a really imaginary hierarchy between "news" and "blogs" when all news articles do is express someone's opinion without using the term "I"? But I digress. If TMZ's the only blog considered reliable, they need to hurry-up with TMZSports.com.
The NCAA and Congress should conduct an investigation for having a bowl game that had two calls that looked like - to me - the officials were in on some kind of fix. How else can one explain a long pass in the second quarter that was obviously caught out of bounds as a catch?
How can anyone say that a video which showed a ball bouncing into the foot of a USC player on a punt turn, as that player was pushing the Boston College punt defender, was USC's ball because the USC person was blocked into the ball?
It's right there on the video - unless the video was destroyed. Did anyone make a video of the game?
Wow.
Sorry. For the media not to question what's in their face and with outrage is outrageous. I'm happy the Pac-10 won a 2009 bowl game, but come on! Not this way.
Anytime one can go to a Cal Football forum and see that fans know the officials were making "pro-USC" calls, you know there's a problem. Say, even though Cal fans are USC rivals, we're supposed to root for the Pac-10 in bowl games. I expect to see the complaint at a Boston College forum, and I did, but Cal too?
This is a matter of right versus wrong. It really hurt to watch that game.
USC was not playing much better than Boston College until after that punt return call, which could have and would have changed the momentum of the game and given Boston College the ball at the USC 30.
Didn't happen.
The refs spent a good five minutes "coming up with the wording" as one ESPN annoucer put it, to explain the call they were about to make. Even ESPN's Rod Gillmore was aghast, asking anyone why they were taking so much time.
The 2009 Emerald Bowl will go down as a game that did not show NCAA College Football at its officiating best.
It was almost like watching professional wrestling in that the fix seemed so clearly to be on.
Why is Google allowing a really imaginary hierarchy between "news" and "blogs" when all news articles do is express someone's opinion without using the term "I"? But I digress. If TMZ's the only blog considered reliable, they need to hurry-up with TMZSports.com.
The NCAA and Congress should conduct an investigation for having a bowl game that had two calls that looked like - to me - the officials were in on some kind of fix. How else can one explain a long pass in the second quarter that was obviously caught out of bounds as a catch?
How can anyone say that a video which showed a ball bouncing into the foot of a USC player on a punt turn, as that player was pushing the Boston College punt defender, was USC's ball because the USC person was blocked into the ball?
It's right there on the video - unless the video was destroyed. Did anyone make a video of the game?
Wow.
Sorry. For the media not to question what's in their face and with outrage is outrageous. I'm happy the Pac-10 won a 2009 bowl game, but come on! Not this way.
Anytime one can go to a Cal Football forum and see that fans know the officials were making "pro-USC" calls, you know there's a problem. Say, even though Cal fans are USC rivals, we're supposed to root for the Pac-10 in bowl games. I expect to see the complaint at a Boston College forum, and I did, but Cal too?
This is a matter of right versus wrong. It really hurt to watch that game.
USC was not playing much better than Boston College until after that punt return call, which could have and would have changed the momentum of the game and given Boston College the ball at the USC 30.
Didn't happen.
The refs spent a good five minutes "coming up with the wording" as one ESPN annoucer put it, to explain the call they were about to make. Even ESPN's Rod Gillmore was aghast, asking anyone why they were taking so much time.
The 2009 Emerald Bowl will go down as a game that did not show NCAA College Football at its officiating best.
Saturday, December 26, 2009
Urban Meyer update - Meyer could be replaced by Dan Mullen
The legendary innovator Urban Meyer will step down as Head Coach of the Florida Gators after his team takes on the Cincinnati Bearcats in the Sugar Bowl. Meyer, who's health problems (including chest pains after Florida's 32 - 13 loss to Alabama in the 2009 SEC championship game) finally convinced him to leave the field.
Urban Meyer, to me, is irreplaceable by anyone except former Florida Offensive Coordinator Dan Mullen (now Head Coach at Mississippi State)
As Chris Brown points out in a comprehensive blog post at SmartFootball.com, Urban Meyer's contribution to football was to take several seemingly disparate offensive concepts - the Run-and-Shoot, the Spread Passing Offense used by Joe Tiller at Purdue, the Shotgun Formation, Zone Running, and The Triple Option - and fuse them together into a new offensive approach.
Urban Meyer has been so successful with this system that New England Patriots Head Coach Bill Belichek sent then-Quarterback Coach (now Denver Broncos Head Coach) Josh McDaniel down to learn about his offense in 2006. The result was several key changes that led to the Patriots record-setting passing game in 2007.
Urban Meyer and Dan Mullen refined the Spread Offense over time such that play-action passes (which Chris Brown points out were considered impossible in Shotgun Formations) are a common part of the attack.
My point is, Meyer and Mullen really created that offense and have been the architects of Florida's success. Dan Mullen's the most logical candidate to replace Meyer.
The question is if Mississippi State will match Florida's reported possible payout of $4.9 million a year. Since Mullen takes in just $1.2 million, it's not likely that will happen. While other coaches like Bobby Petrino at Arkansas and Bob Stoops at Oklahoma are rumored to replace Urban Meyer, Dan Mullen's the best choice to step in as he's a seamless fit.
Urban Meyer, to me, is irreplaceable by anyone except former Florida Offensive Coordinator Dan Mullen (now Head Coach at Mississippi State)
As Chris Brown points out in a comprehensive blog post at SmartFootball.com, Urban Meyer's contribution to football was to take several seemingly disparate offensive concepts - the Run-and-Shoot, the Spread Passing Offense used by Joe Tiller at Purdue, the Shotgun Formation, Zone Running, and The Triple Option - and fuse them together into a new offensive approach.
Urban Meyer has been so successful with this system that New England Patriots Head Coach Bill Belichek sent then-Quarterback Coach (now Denver Broncos Head Coach) Josh McDaniel down to learn about his offense in 2006. The result was several key changes that led to the Patriots record-setting passing game in 2007.
Urban Meyer and Dan Mullen refined the Spread Offense over time such that play-action passes (which Chris Brown points out were considered impossible in Shotgun Formations) are a common part of the attack.
My point is, Meyer and Mullen really created that offense and have been the architects of Florida's success. Dan Mullen's the most logical candidate to replace Meyer.
The question is if Mississippi State will match Florida's reported possible payout of $4.9 million a year. Since Mullen takes in just $1.2 million, it's not likely that will happen. While other coaches like Bobby Petrino at Arkansas and Bob Stoops at Oklahoma are rumored to replace Urban Meyer, Dan Mullen's the best choice to step in as he's a seamless fit.
Happy Kwanzaa! December 26th is the first day of Kwanzaa
Kwanzaa is a seven-day celebration of family, community, and culture. It's an African American holiday; born of the first harvest celebrations of Africa. In a custom similar to Hanukkah, Kwanzaa is marked by candle-lighting and gift giving.
This Kwanzaa opening ceremony was held at Youth Uprising in Oakland in 2009:
Greg Hodge, who ran for Oakland's District Three City Council seat in 2008, is also Minister Greg Hodge of Wo'se Church in Oakland. In this video, he talks about the importance of language and names in Kwanzaa. Greg, as usual, offers great words of wisdom:
If you're looking for a good guide for the preparation of Kwanzaa-related cuisine, check out the new website Cuisine Noir.
Stay tuned and Happy Kwanzaa!
This Kwanzaa opening ceremony was held at Youth Uprising in Oakland in 2009:
Greg Hodge, who ran for Oakland's District Three City Council seat in 2008, is also Minister Greg Hodge of Wo'se Church in Oakland. In this video, he talks about the importance of language and names in Kwanzaa. Greg, as usual, offers great words of wisdom:
If you're looking for a good guide for the preparation of Kwanzaa-related cuisine, check out the new website Cuisine Noir.
Stay tuned and Happy Kwanzaa!
Charlie Sheen update - Brooke Mueller Sheen blows off police
In this Charlie Sheen update, we learn from TMZ.com that Brooke Mueller Sheen is blowing off the Aspen, Colorado police.
Charlie Sheen was arrested and placed in the Pitkin, County Jail in Aspen, Colorado on Christmas morning after having been charged with, according to the Aspen Times, a class-four felony charge of second-degree assault and a class-five felony charge of menacing. He was also charged with a misdemeanor count of what is called "criminal mischief."
District Judge James Boyd presided over a hearing called Friday, Christmas night. The Judge issued a mandatory protection order against Sheen; he can't have contact with Brooke Mueller Sheen. He posted bond, set at $8,500 and was released.
Aspen lawyer Richie Cummins said Sheen was scheduled to board a flight to Los Angeles.
Now, TMZ.com reports Brooke Mueller Sheen "has told cops she's done talking with them about the incident" when they tried to re-interview her on Saturday. Initial reports quoted Colorado law enforcement officials as saying Brooke Mueller Sheen was legally drunk when she made a 911 call to report Charlie Sheen.
TMZ.com has also reported that Brooke Muller Sheen changed her story from what she said during the 911 call.
Some have asked why Charlie Sheen managed to get a hearing on Christmas night. One reason separate from who Charlie Sheen is, is that he picked the right lawyer. Richie Cummins is reportedly a 30-year criminal lawyer in Aspen. He knows all of the police, sheriffs, and judges. Sheen made the right choice.
RadarOnline.com reported that Charlie and Brooke took a "trial separation". They reportedly met in Aspen where Muller rented a house and started arguing Christmas morning.
Charlie Sheen is to report back to court in Colorado, February 8th.
Charlie Sheen was arrested and placed in the Pitkin, County Jail in Aspen, Colorado on Christmas morning after having been charged with, according to the Aspen Times, a class-four felony charge of second-degree assault and a class-five felony charge of menacing. He was also charged with a misdemeanor count of what is called "criminal mischief."
District Judge James Boyd presided over a hearing called Friday, Christmas night. The Judge issued a mandatory protection order against Sheen; he can't have contact with Brooke Mueller Sheen. He posted bond, set at $8,500 and was released.
Charlie Sheen and Brooke Mueller Sheen
Aspen lawyer Richie Cummins said Sheen was scheduled to board a flight to Los Angeles.
Now, TMZ.com reports Brooke Mueller Sheen "has told cops she's done talking with them about the incident" when they tried to re-interview her on Saturday. Initial reports quoted Colorado law enforcement officials as saying Brooke Mueller Sheen was legally drunk when she made a 911 call to report Charlie Sheen.
TMZ.com has also reported that Brooke Muller Sheen changed her story from what she said during the 911 call.
Some have asked why Charlie Sheen managed to get a hearing on Christmas night. One reason separate from who Charlie Sheen is, is that he picked the right lawyer. Richie Cummins is reportedly a 30-year criminal lawyer in Aspen. He knows all of the police, sheriffs, and judges. Sheen made the right choice.
RadarOnline.com reported that Charlie and Brooke took a "trial separation". They reportedly met in Aspen where Muller rented a house and started arguing Christmas morning.
Charlie Sheen is to report back to court in Colorado, February 8th.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)