A week after last week's mid-term elections and many people all over the country are still trying to take stock as to what went right, what went wrong and what it means for the future. If you're on the left side of the political spectrum one of the over-riding concern was why the large base of young, Black and Brown folks who voted in record numbers in '08 didn't show up in 2010.
Now if you listen to high-priced political consultants or the news pundits who rarely do GOTV work, they'll tell you the drop in numbers was because '
people don't vote in large numbers during mid-terms' . When pressed and asked could it be that folks felt disconnected and were enormously dissatisfied, those same consultants and pundits will try to spin it and assert: '
These young voters were lazy they should've gotten off their butts and voted' ,'
They were impatient and haven't given the President and the Democrats times to accomplish their agenda' or '
They were naive and to think political discourse would not be messy, frustrating and ugly at times. Of course the tried and true assertion is that young voters were being
unrealistic with their political expectations.[caption id="attachment_5834" align="alignright" width="275" caption="The constant communication via outlets frequented by Young Voters disappeared after the 08 election. The enthusiasm young voters had for Obama dried up and never transferred over to other democrats who also ignored young voters"]
[/caption]
We say wrong answers. How about it was lack of effective communication? Young voters weren't being reached out to in any meaningful way? How about much of the leadership inside the Democratic Party took those young voters for granted? To sum up what one of the elder poll workers stated at the precinct I worked last week,
'these young people were used and discarded'. Nobody wants to admit to that, but it's true. That's a hard and sobering pill for many to swallow.
Many of the young voters who rallied enthusiastically around
President Obama during his historic campaign found that after January 20 2009 when he made history and was sworn in as the 44th President of the United States, he would be ghost. He would do very little outreach in the same manner that attracted folks to him in the first place.i.e. he stopped making regular appearances on urban outlets and frequented by young folks. Sadly the hosts and owners of those outlets did very little to highlight and sell the policies the Obama administration was pushing.
When this has been brought to the attention of Democratic pundits and even those close to the Obama administration, instead of taking this to heart and figuring out ways to better communicate, many have become defensive and dismissive. They would resort to rattling off stale talking points about how they passed a healthcare bill and reduced student loan burdens.
These same folks would continue and arrogantly make the case that it was up to those young voters to go seek the President elsewhere on other media outlets and that he was too busy to be showing up on 'some radio show'. In other words it was time to '
buck up' as
Vice President Joe Biden infamously put it. If folks kept speaking to this issue, they were then labeled the '
professional left' as articulated by White House spokesman
Robert Gibbs.
[caption id="attachment_5835" align="alignleft" width="246" caption="White House spokesman Robert Gibbs calling those who expressed concerns, the 'professional left' not only angered folks but it also added to the perception that the base was being ignored"]
[/caption]
Are all those folks who are part of the base who volunteered their time and energy and offered innovative ideas being too thin-skinned? Perhaps, but so what? President Obama has shown sensitivity and accommodated all sorts of groups who have challenging outlooks. He certainly seems to have no problem trying to sooth over angry folks in the opposition. These 'thin-skinned' people are voters who put him into office and after being dissed were being asked to support others Democrats so he could further his agenda...an agenda that many within the ranks were increasingly feeling disconnected from.
Were young voters being unrealistic? Not really. Why would their mindset be
unrealistic when many embarked on a political journey for the first time with a man who told them to think outside the box, have high expectations and the audacity of hope?
Why would they be unrealistic when they were working with a man who is now President, but started out as a community organizer, came from a single parent home and had a 'funny sounding' name? His young base was sold on the idea that they were and did make a tremendous difference. They were sold on the concept that they were an important part of this push to change. This was inspiring and helped many to step up and do impossible for themselves during the campaign.
Unfortunately, many novices never knew about governance. Folks were eagerly waiting and yearning still to be involved and continue on. As far as they were concerned Obama left them. In his place were handlers and surrogates who seemed more interested in dampening the hope within folks versus uplifting them. Maybe it was poor communication skills. Maybe it was misguided attempts to administer '
tough love'. Maybe it was a case of haterism. Far too many in these political circles are cynical and seemingly want everyone around them to feel the same. Whatever the case, the enthusiasm people had for President Obama had diminished. This made it difficult to transfer support and energy to other Democrats running in the mid-terms.
[caption id="attachment_5836" align="alignright" width="254" caption="Democratic pundits seemed impervious and dismissive to the popularity of urban radio hosts like LA based Big Boy. If this is the place frequented by large numbers of young, Black and Brown voters in your base why not talk directly to that audience above beyond election time?"]
[/caption]
What seemed to be missed by Obama and his handlers was the importance of having direct exchanges with his young base. We're not talking the last-minute flurry where he suddenly showed up at the 11th hour on radio shows like
Big Boy'
s Neighborhood and TV shows like
Jon Stewart's
Daily Show. What was needed was on going communication especially when he was pushing important issues. They seemed to not appreciate and realize by doing so it allowed each to check in and be on the same page. While it was true his base could seek him elsewhere and many did, what was missed was the opportunity for him to dial in and genuinely know where many of these new voters were at. He needed to know where they were coming from in the midst of them witnessing the ugliness of Tea Party, Fox News, 24-7 demonization and onslaught.
He needed to know where they were at when they saw him constantly bending over backwards and going out of his way to break bread with people, pundits and communities that were not only hostile to him, but also to the people in his base and the ideals and aspirations they held. Who could forget the frustration many had after watching president Obama lash out to Cambridge police for hemming up his friend and well-known Harvard
Professor Henry Louis '
Skip' Gates. When President Obama said the police
acted stupidly for arresting this elder in his own home, many in his base who could relate to hearing about police over stepping their bounds cheered. At last someone in high office was calling it like it was..is how many people felt. We gave each other high fives only to turn around and let out collective groans when President Obama immediately turned around capitulated, took back his remarks and apologized after police reacted angrily.
That incident exemplifies Obama's constant backtracking on key issues and in the face of hostile political enemies. Him not directly communicating to his base exasperated the situation and perceptions.The end result was low voter turnout while the older base of his Tea party and GOP opposition doubled their turnout.
[caption id="attachment_5837" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="Political analyst and radio host Robert Muhammad described the constant overlooking and slights delivered to important segments of the Democratic base is a continuation of what he called Plantation Politics "]
[/caption]
We spoke with long time political analyst and talk show host
Robert Muhammad (Connect the Dots KPFT-Houston ) who lambasted Democratic leadership especially gubernatorial hopeful
Bill White in Texas where Muhammad is based. He pointed out that White opted to devote, time, money and resources to try for so-called Independent voters at the expense of the much larger Black and Brown communities. This was a typical pattern nationwide.
He explained, that White was so scared to be associated with the base that he even stayed away from
President Obama who enjoys tremendous popularity in those communities. The end result was long time
Governor Rick Perry stomping his way to victory for a 4th term and one of White's Democratic rivals endorsing the republic governor.
Robert Muhammad called what took place a continuation of
plantation politics where Black and Brown communities are taken for granted and ignored. Efforts to connect the dots so to speak were rebuffed by those who supposedly had the expertise and
'knew better'. Well the dismal results speak for themselves. You can peep our interview with Robert Muhammad on
Hard Knock Radio...
http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/65170Muhammad further elaborated that the vitriol and hostile reaction demonstrated during this past year harks back to the days of the Reconstruction when Black people had the most political power which set off all sorts of a rash of lynchings, killings and race riots all over the country and the eventual birth of Jim Crow laws.
What's going in places like Texas is an emboldened far right coalition of law makers who are going all out to smash legislatively smash on marginalized communities. For example, there are lawmakers who are calling for the state to
secede from the Medicaid. That seems to coincide with the new campaign to roll back Obama's Healthcare Plan.
[caption id="attachment_5013" align="alignright" width="200" caption="Texas lawmaker Debbie Riddle typifies the aggressive stances being taken by the far right. She's already introduced 6 bills designed to smash on Brown communities. She actually camped out at the state Capitol so she would be first on the floor."]
[/caption]
Other law makers like Debbie Riddle, the crazy woman from Texas who sat up on national TV and told us to be wary of Brown people bearing
Anchor and
Terror Babies has camped out at the state capitol in Austin so she could submit 6 bills targeting Mexicans
Here's what the state of Texas has in store for Brown communities as outlined by
Texas Gop Vote HB 16 - VOTER ID
Voters have been clamoring for voter ID for the past two sessions. It was passed in the house in 2007 and in the senate until Lt. Governor Dewhurst gave Sen. Whitmire a "do over" on the vote and the Dems wheeled Sen. Gallegos into the senate floor on a gurney and let him cast the defeating vote.
In 2009 the opposite happened with the senate passing the bill and the Democrats pulling a procedural stunt to kill it in the house.
The overwhelming majority of Texas voters support voter ID. Now it is time to pass it.
The new bill requires the voter to present a photo ID from an acceptable source, or two non-photo ID's from an acceptable source.
Click Here for details on this bill.
HB 17 - Criminal Trespass
This bill makes the presence of an illegal alien in the state of Texas a separate offense, criminal trespass, which can be added to a charge for which a person is already being arrested.
In other words, this bill gives a police officer who is already arresting a person for some other offense (an offense for which they may arrest without a warrant) may, upon reasonable suspicion that the person is in the country illegally, may inquire as to the suspects immigration status and if the officer can verify an illegal status with ICE, the person may be charged with the additional crime of illegal trespass.
Before and arrest can be made on this charge, the officer must verify their status with ICE. This bill cannot be used as a reason for first contact with a suspect.
Click Here for details of this bill.
HB 18 - Eliminate Sanctuary Cities
HB 18 prohibits any city, county or other jurisdictional body from adopting a rule, order, ordinance or policy which says the entity will not fully enforce laws relating to immigrants or immigration.
The bill also cuts off state funds to any entity which adopts such a rule or policy. It also provides the Attorney General with a process and capability to enforce this bill.
Click Here for details of this bill.
HB 19 - Driving Without a License
This bill provides penalties for a person who operates a vehicle in the State of Texas who does not have a driver's license issue to them and provides for the impoundment of certain vehicles involved in an accident. It raises the status of the crime to a class B misdemeanor if the driver is involved in a motor vehicle accident.
It also provides that the vehicle cannot be released from impoundment without proof of insurance.
Click Here for details of this bill.
HB 21 and HB 22 - Reporting on Illegal Aliens by State Agencies and Public Schools
These two bill are grouped together by me as they accomplish similar functions. These bill require state agencies and public schools who are providing services to illegal aliens to gather information and report this information to the state for the purpose of measuring the impact of illegal immigration as a cost to the state for providing the services described in the bills.
Click here for details on HB 21 and HB 22.
So where do we go from here?
President Obama is going to have to clear the boards and re-introduce himself to his base. He's going to have to establish solid relationships the same way he and every other politician does with other communities. He's going to have to establish strong relationships with those who reach those communities and be sure that folks are truly instep and not just talking a big game.
Lastly and most important President Obama will have to seriously listen to people in his base and not dismiss them. You never see him be dismissive of AIPAC or Wall Street, he shouldn't be dismissive of those who may not have money, but people power.
President Obama will have to reflect the concerns of these communities in his rhetoric. While Health Care may have been a major accomplishment, it's not the talking point folks are trying to hear. Tell folks how they can get a job or an apartment with messed up credit? Talk to the young base about the rash of police shootings from
Oscar Grant in Oakland to
Denroy Henry in New York and what can be done about them. Work with folks about how they can fend off student fee hikes. The possibilities are endless, but mark my words, if Obama and friends don't improve on the communication tip, he will most definitely be a one term President.
Something to ponder
written by Davey D
Return to Davey D's Hip Hop Corner
