Monday, October 12, 2009

Academy Awards news - eight films for Documentary Short Subject

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com



The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences reports that eight films have been selected to compete for the award of "Documentary Short Subject" at the 82nd Annual Academy Awards.

The films, selected by the Academy’s Documentary Branch which viewed this year’s 37 eligible entries, are listed below in alphabetical order by title, with their production company:

"China’s Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province," Downtown Community Television Center, Inc.
"The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner," Just Media
"The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant," Community Media Productions
"Lt. Watada," Chanlim Films
"Music by Prudence," iThemba Productions, Inc.
"Rabbit a la Berlin," MS Films
"Tell Them Anything You Want: A Portrait of Maurice Sendak," Outside Productions
"Woman Rebel," Women Rebel Films

From this group, three to five will earn Oscar nominations. The 82nd Academy Awards nominations will be announced on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, at 5:30 a.m. PT in the Academy’s Samuel Goldwyn Theater.

As to the early favorites, it's hard not to think it's got to be "The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant", given the economic times, and "Tell Them Anything You Want: A Portrait of Maurice Sendak" which is about the creator of the popular "Where the Wild Things Are."

Stay tuned.

Blogger says NY Times uses misleading photo to blame Chevron in Ecuador case

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com

Two bloggers, Carter Wood of ShopFloor.org and Jeff Poor of Business & Media Institute are pointing a finger at the New York Times for using a photo and a story that seems to blame Chevron for environmental damage from oil production in Ecuador. Chevron has not operated in Ecuador since 1992. It turned over its production to the state-run company Petroecuador.


A murky photo to say the least

Chevron has been fighting Ecuador - who would get 90 percent of the estimated $27 billion in the lawsuit if Chevron lost - in this case. The photo was used in a NY Times story called "Ecuador Oil Pollution Case Only Grows Murkier."

The problem with the photo, Wood and others claim, is that the photo applies to Petroecuador. But I will go a step beyond that. There have been over 100 oil spills in the Ecuador Amazon region which includes the town of Lago Agrio since 1992, so a combination of firms including Petroecuador are to blame, but not of them American.

Ecuador kicked Occidental Petroleum out of the country in 2007 and took over Chevron production in 1992. So the finger points to the state-run oil company.

Wood explains just who's really behind the lawsuit from his point of view:

The lawsuit is being financed by the Philadelphia law firm of Kohn, Swift and Graf, directed by New York trial lawyer Steven Donziger, and marketed by the Amazon Defense Coalition, which would receive the money from any settlement. And the legal/activist lawsuit is indeed a shakedown intended to force a settlement from Chevron for pollution supposedly left by Texaco, which Chevron purchased in 2001. Texaco operated in Ecuador as Texpet in a joint exploration and production venture with the government-owned oil company, Petroecuador, up until 1992. (See this Texaco history, “Chevron in Ecuador.”)


1992. 1992. 1992. 1992. We stress the year because any oil now appearing as liquid in Ecuador is the responsibility of Petroecuador. First, TexPet remediated all the sites assigned to it for clean-up by the government of Ecuador, which released the company from future claims. Second, oil doesn’t stay liquid on the surface for 17 years!

I will go a step further because someone must be paying Kohn, Swift and Graf for that law firm to be able to pay Donziger, and the Amazon Defense Coalition, and Amazon Watch. Remember law firms do not have to disclose their clients.

Who would be interested in arranging a deal to keep this money flow going from law firm to lawyer to anti-American-oil-company activist to sue an American company?

Well, think about it. While Amazon Watch and the Amazon Defense Coalition may claim to represent the "indigenous people" of Ecuador, why haven't they filed a lawsuit against Ecuador? After all, to this day, 65 percent of the Amazon is zoned to allow oil production.

That's no accident.

Sarah Palin "Going Rogue" will keep her out of office

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com

Let me start by sharing that I like Governor Sarah Palin. Yes, I know she's no longer governor of the Great State of Alaska, but I was raised that you call a person who was a head of state by their former title, hence I will refer to her as Governor Sarah Palin. But it's the "former" tag that will keep her out of office for a good long time.



As Governor of Alaska, and the GOP Vice Presidential Candidate, I firmly believed that Governor Palin was a political star of the future but as an independent. I fully expected Palin to resign from the GOP in the middle of the presidential campaign because of all of her problems, but she stuck it out mainly by fighting with McCain Campaign elites.


Sarah Palin 

Gov. Palin was treated terribly by the staff of the McCain Campaign and it's really because she was not cut from the elitist cloth that Americans have come to expect from their elected officials.

Her new book "Going Rogue" is proof of what I've expected all along: that Governor Palin didn't want to learn how to be an effective politician at the highest levels of office. Like any member of the masses who obtains a little power and attention, it overcame the larger responsibility of governing and so she jettisoned being Alaska's leader.

By contrast, elite elected officials rise to power because they have an overarching sense of purpose that involves true social change focused more on helping people than a party or a group. The lynchpin idea of Ronald Reagan's assent to power was that government had become too large and inefficient at a time that America didn't need goverment spending to supercharge the economy.

Reagan tapped into an idea that Americans were overtaxed and bullied. He caught that political lightening in a bottle and used it to form a conservative revolution that lasted 25 years. But over that time the offshoring of industry weakened America's economy and now we're in a position where without government spending the country's financial system would have collapsed.

Exactly the wrong time to call for "smaller government." No elite is asked for this. No Republican or Democrat in power will tell you that we don't need the stimulus program, but will tell you that money's not getting our fast enough for their areas. That's an elite agreement on the policy direction for America to repair its economy.

It's exactly what Governor Palin's advocating against and why Alaskan's were angry with her for rejecting about 30 percent of stimulus money. At first Palin's "logic" was that Alaska's oil revenues would help make up the difference, but that over $2,000 per Alaskan check reduced to about half that in 2009.

Palin's other message in rejecting the money was that it was to go to "grow government" but that's where the Governor showed that she flunked Economics 101.

In Economics 101, we learn that Gross Domestic Product equals spending from Consumers, Investments, Government, and Exports, minus Imports. So what happens when the "C" or "Consumers" can't spend as much? We have a weaker economy and the "G" - that's Government - is used to make up the difference.

That's where we are today and why so many Alaskans thought Governor Palin lost her mind when she threw back part of the stimulus money. Again, her attempt to channel Ronald Reagan - who had the voice of elites because economic conditions in the 80s favored his message - failed because his ideas are wrong for today.

Elites understand this and are interested only in solving the economic problem. Ideologs like Palin certainly tap into a point of view held, frankly, by a group of the masses that are not elite, but that's the problem.

Gov. Palin has become a kind of repository for the hopes and fears of the undereducated mostly white American masses. And that is why Governor Palin will never be taken seriously as a political candidate in the near future, even by her own supporters. Elites form policy direction and have done so. Palin's message is outside of that of the power elite because it doesn't help solve the problems they're dealing with.

So what happens? She's caractured. Made fun of. Her family issues take center stage with former future son-in law Levi Johnston posting nude and talking to everyone with a TV camera. All of this, but no real talk of Palin as the serious GOP Presidential candidate. If Palin remained as Governor, and learned to play the elite game, she would have been a shoe-in.

Now, Palin's best chance to be take seriously is an an independent party candidate. But the minute that parade of Ralph Naders and Lyndon La Rouches comes out of the gate, her value will diminish yet again.

When the words "kook" and "fringe" are written in the same paragraph as your name, and that becomes a constant Saturday Night Live punch-line, your chances of really getting elected are toast.

"Going Rogue" has made Palin a millionaire, but it's also rendered her unelectable and out of touch with America's problems and the Power Elite. Governor Palin would be happy not to be associated with the last group, the Power Elite , but that is why she's failed as an elected official.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Jimmy Kimmel dating aide Molly McNearney like David Letterman and Stephanie Birkitt

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com

Wow! Here's some bolt out of the blue news! Jimmy Kimmel, host of "Jimmy Kimmel Live" on ABC is dating aide Molly McNearney. Now that's just like David Letterman and Stephanie Birkitt, right?

I think so and it shows just what I've been writing and saying for the past week plus: that this is so common that for some to point fingers at David Letterman is really hypocritical because they're guilty of the same behavior.

According to the Associated Press Jimmy Kimmel was one of them, who joked about David Letterman's scandal two weeks back when it hit the news. Now, he's in the same boat as Letterman. Well, ok, he was always there!

(In fairness, other sources now say that Kimmel claims he never joked about David Letterman in this matter.)

Who's Molly McNearney?



Molly McNearney

She's 31 years old and one of his staff writers according to American Super Star Magazine. She first joined the show as "assistant to the executive producer" and now has the title of "co-head writer" on the show.

She's like Stephanie Birkitt in that both are in their early 30s, female and white, and work on television talk shows.

What is it about the TV talk show workplace, anyway?

And while this news is just surfacing in People Magazine, the affair has been in the celeb gossip files for over a year. Gawker reported that Kimmel was "getting into the pants" of Molly McNearney, calling her his "On-The-Job-Girlfriend."

What's funny is that People Magazine's Lisa Ingrassia writes:

While the relationship may draw comparisons to David Letterman's recent revelations, the insider says, "during work hours, they keep things professional."
How the heck does that source know?!  Geez.

Mike Zimmer's wife passes; Zimmer guts it out with Bengals win

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com

Death is hard to deal in any case, so I congratulate Cinncinati Bengals Defensive Coordinator Mike Zimmer for coming back to work and getting a victory against the Baltimore Ravens 17 to 14, and give sympathy for the loss of his wife, Vicky Zimmer.


Coach Mike Zimmer

Coach Zimmer, who earned the game ball for the win today, reportedly and sadly went home Friday to find his wife not breathing. No foul play was reported.

The Zimmers were married 27 years; she was 50 years old and leaves behind Coach Zimmer and three children: two sons and a daughter.

Denver Broncos yellow throwback jerseys not well received

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com

I know it's the 50th anniversary of the AFL, part of the two football leagues AFL and NFL that merged to form the National Football League in 1970, but some are wondering why today we have to be subjected to the authentic AFL team jerseys, even if they look sick and I don't mean that in a good way.


Broncos's QB Kyle Orton and Head Coach Josh McDaniel


Take the Denver Broncos' throwback jerseys worm today in their game against the New England Patriots. Even though the Broncos' won in overtime 20 to 17, it could have only happened because the Patriots wore their throwback uniforms, to a time when the Pats were the laughing stock of the league. Without that, the Broncos' throwback dress should be tossed in the broom closet and used only for Halloween.

I love what Larry Brown wrote over at his blog "Larry Brown Sports":


The Broncos are sporting those hideous yellow and brown uniforms that have to be amongst the ugliest NFL uniforms I’ve ever seen — and that’s coming from a Bengals fan. The story has it that the reason the Broncos had those colors is because their original owner was cheap and wanted a uniform that could be worn both at home on the road. He got his wish. He also pained the eyes of everyone in Colorado.


Yuck.

Denver Broncos yellow throwback jerseys not well received

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com

I know it's the 50th anniversary of the AFL, part of the two football leagues AFL and NFL that merged to form the National Football League in 1970, but some are wondering why today we have to be subjected to the authentic AFL team jerseys, even if they look sick and I don't mean that in a good way.


Broncos's QB Kyle Orton and Head Coach Josh McDaniel


Take the Denver Broncos' throwback jerseys worm today in their game against the New England Patriots. Even though the Broncos' won in overtime 20 to 17, it could have only happened because the Patriots wore their throwback uniforms, to a time when the Pats were the laughing stock of the league. Without that, the Broncos' throwback dress should be tossed in the broom closet and used only for Halloween.

I love what Larry Brown wrote over at his blog "Larry Brown Sports":


The Broncos are sporting those hideous yellow and brown uniforms that have to be amongst the ugliest NFL uniforms I’ve ever seen — and that’s coming from a Bengals fan. The story has it that the reason the Broncos had those colors is because their original owner was cheap and wanted a uniform that could be worn both at home on the road. He got his wish. He also pained the eyes of everyone in Colorado.


Yuck.