Thursday, May 20, 2010
Zennie62 at TechCrunch Disrupt, New York, by Christine Smith Contractors
The trip is sponsored by Christine Smith Associates, Inc., the Premier Female Contractor in NYC. (Christine Smith is probably the only New York Contractor to be featured, not just mentioned, in New York Post Page 6 by Cindy Adams.)
TechCrunch Disrupt (@TCDisrupt on Twitter) is a mating of media people and tech people in arguably the next tech center, New York City. TechCrunch Disrupt is an answer to the problem noted in this space where tech people talk to tech people and journalists talk to journalists about the future of media, but not to each other.
But TechCrunch Disrupt goes a massive step beyond that and ads the venture capitalist to the mix. The result is a stew of creative people and a presentation of startup companies that will drive the future of media and communications. It will have speakers like Jason Calacanis from Mahalo, and Charlie Rose will interview legendary Venture Capitalist John Doerr. But more important than names are firms; TechCrunch will have scores of new media and communications companies just getting off the ground.
TechCrunch Disrupt runs from May 24th to May 26th and will be held at an Merrill Lynch office at 570 Washington Street in Manhattan, where "SoHo Meets The Hudson" as the website reads. I'm honored and excited to have been invited to cover this event. I guess Hearst Corporation / SF Chronicle Executive Vice President of Content Development and Editor-at-Large Phil Bronstein was right when he referred to me as an insurgent: that's another term for disrupter.
I like that.
In fact, let's look at my video interview with Phil from earlier this year because it provides a good look at how the changing media landscape impacts The San Francisco Chronicle, and what's important in "new media tech" from Phil's perspective:
Join this space for a virtual trip to TechCruch Disrupt, but if you want to attend you can get tickets here: TICKETS.
See ya!
---
Christine Smith Associates, Inc. is Located and based out of Historic Gramercy Park has made construction dreams come true. She designs AND project manages - like having your own personal rep on the job! She takes care of it all from your voice thru the city agencies to gain all necessary approvals on and into the hands of the tradesmen.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Campbell Brown, Miley Cyrus, sex and hypocrisy
YouTube, Yahoo, Metacafe, DailyMotion, Blip.tv and StupidVideos
Campbell Brown |
But really, what's Sexism?
Sexism in its purest form is putting a person down because of their sex. Again, Campbell Brown's a top-flight news anchor who should have the position she had with CNN and more. CNN was right to work a deal to land Brown over two years ago.
But in 2008, CNN was being clobbered by Fox News in TV ratings. Fox News was known for its presentation of female anchors in short skirts. Weathering criticism, Fox News continues the practice to this day and has established a ratings lead over CNN that's horrifyingly large.
But sexist? Even the definitions of Sexism listed in Wikipedia explain only that one can argue that while using sex to cause people to watch a telecast may be sexist, it's not agreed that this is the case. The reason for this is the extreme levels of hypocrisy on display in this debate.
For example, had I said CNN's Anderson Cooper should wear a polo shirt to show his cut muscular body, no one would blog that was sexist and some women would click the "like" button on Facebook (heck, some guys too). The fact is, Anderson Cooper's not leaving his show as of this writing. But more to the point is it seems to be OK to point to male sexual assets on television but not to female sexual assets, yet, the patterns of viewing shows a desire to "see female skin."
Some bloggers are down right hypocritical in their criticism of the "sex sells" approach. Entertainment Tonight blogger Aly Semigran said that my take of Campbell Brown was sexist. But get this, Aly Semigran herself is known as a blogger who specializes in blogging about sex scandals according to NewsObserver.com. In her posts, she uses terms like "icky" to describe a sex scandal, yet is drawn to blog about it like a fish to water.
Using terms like "icky" is a way to wash out the guilt Aly feels from writing about sex scandals and also to mask the sheer enjoyment she undoubtedly gets from blogging about everything from Tiger Woods Mistresses and the Tiger Woods Text Messages, to John Edwards and Rielle Hunter, and of course Charlie Sheen.
In other words, Aly Semigran covers the same ground that this blogger walks, but does so with guilt; I have none. Aly knows sex sells, but she's conflicted. That's the worst place to be.
It's terrible because Aly dives down the sexual fox hole with gusto and is willing to get dirty but runs the risk of not knowing when the lines between what's acceptable taste and isn't are blurred. If a person has no fear of using sex in media they know when not to use it and why.
For example, Aly seems to write about every sex scandal there is. If God were involved in a sex scandal, she'd blog it. Last month, Aly wrote about another sex scandal that I consider very low-level: it would never make the Google Trends list so why bother? Yet Aly did so, and repeats an email Actress Garcelle Beauvais-Nilon wrote to CAA staff about her allegedly cheating husband that wasn't important to repost except for shock value and so you will not see here.
I could argue Aly was being sexist for, in her pursuit of sex scandal stories, presenting women in a certain light by presenting the same images of mistresses and hurt, angry, weathy wives over and over and over again. But because Aly has a fear of using sex that's masked with other reasons, blogging about a low-level story like that one becomes second nature, and the overall impact is lost on her. Makes me think of Desperate Housewives.
Yep, Desperate Housewives, which features the same story lines about, yep, cheating husbands and wives. Desperate Housewives proves that sex sells on television and was one of the most successful launches in television history in 2005.
That's the field Aly's playing in. A show that some call sexist and offensive. Yet here's Aly presenting the same kind of material to her audience and yet calling me sexist because I want a powerful female anchor and not a wife or a mistress to show some leg to get ratings. That's hypocrisy. Is Aly the kind who wears a cleavage showing blouse, dares a guy not to look down, then uses the same as an online profile picture? I wonder.
I will defend my point again and again. Sadly Campbell Brown's going to be off the air on CNN. Meanwhile, Miley Cyrus remains not only on the air but bigger than ever in the wake of the Miley Cyrus Lap Dance Video scandal. Fox News continues its combination of angry white guys, lovely blonde women, and Sarah Palin. And Desperate Housewives is still one of the most popular shows on television.
Sex sells for men and women. It's not a put down of anyone, but a fact of life.
Sandra Bullock to adopt another baby? -- Suzannah B. Troy
I predicted right away that Sandra Bullock could be "going Angelina Jolie" and tonight on Extra (? - unless I am watching TMZ I flip fast) it was mentioned people close to Bullock are saying she does want to adopt very soon so Louis has a younger sibling.
I made this prediction April 29 right here on this blog, Zennie62.com and now it seems I am one step closer to being proven right. http://zennie2005.blogspot.com/2010/04/sandra-bullock-angelina-jolie-adoption.html
I mentioned it on the previous posting about Jesse James coming to tv to tell us his side on Nightline. Good thing Nightline airs late at night so the kiddies will be in bed because anything he has to say is for an adult audience, at least right now.
There are stunning new photos of Louis being hugged tightly to Sandra Bullock in New Orleans as she goes shopping for him and he looks even more beautiful if that is possible. He is a gorgeous baby.
Hollywood is in baby mode over time and I have to say I have late in life baby envy extra bad right now.
Kelly Preston is 3 months pregnant and she is the same age as me, 47. This is not a surprise since she and John Travolta went through the trauma of losing their son.
It is also no surprise to me that Sandra Bullock is rumored to be adopting another child as soon as she can as discussed tonight on a celebrity tv show. She doesn't want to be described as "going Angelina Jolie" I am sure but another People Magazine scoop maybe coming as soon as Sandra Bullock can work out an adoption...adopting a child isn' t like ordering fast food so be patient and stay tuned....
Jesse James Nightline, Sandra Bullock adopting another? Suzannah B. Troy
Did I read on his Wikepedia page that he is not in fact related to Jesse James although he says otherwise ? Yes, sounds like another Jesse James deception and again no one really cares. People that love Jesse James do and they just don't care. Sandra Bullock fans are sighing with relief she has moved on.
Note: On this blog I was first to predict Sandra Bullock would most likely adopt a second child and I just heard on Extra (?) that my prediction is rumored to be a reality in the making. Here is the link where I saw this coming... http://zennie2005.blogspot.com/2010/04/sandra-bullock-angelina-jolie-adoption.html Stay tuned. Back to JJ...
*Jesse James is coming soon to the boob tube (my guess rated parental guidance) good girls beware. Side note: Mae West is my idol and I am a good girl. This is for you Mae. I am a good girl but when even when I am bad, I am really, really good! Probably true of Sandra Bullock as well....
* Why do I think some major porn studio is already in production on Jesse James sex-ploits. I don't know that, just wondering since they started production on Tiger Woods sex-catastrophe in to celluloid very fast.
Bret Michaels leads Celebrity Apprentice poll 80 percent, 5,844 votes
On Monday this space ran a poll asking you to select the Celebrity Apprentice 2010 winner between Bret Michaels and Holly Robinson Peete. There were five choices: Holly Robinson Peete, Bret Michaels, "I don't know at this point", "Both of them", and "Trump picked the wrong final two."
Two days ago, another blog post in this space reported that 70 percent of voters picked Bret Michaels to win the Celebrity Apprentice 2010. The problem with the results at the time was there were just 161 votes.
Now, thanks to the good folks at Pollsb, the makers of the system I regularly use to make online polls, and the placement of the blog posts on Google News, all that has changed. At one point, Pollsb placed the poll on their front page as the "featured poll" and the vote count jumped dramatically. Additionally many of the votes, indeed, the vast majority, have been fueled by online searches.
Now, as of this writing (and it changes every 2 minutes or so by observation as this blog's written), 5,858 votes have been cast and since the design of the Pollsb system guards against duplicate voting, it can be reported that Country Rocker Bret Michaels of Poison has gained 80 percent of the votes cast to be the Celebrity Apprentice 2010 winner.
This is the largest number of respondents to a poll I have created since the Pollsb system was employed in this space. The poll has been viewed 9,381 times as of this writing, so just over 50 percent of the viewers have responded to the poll.
Bret Michaels' popularity was fueled by his very public brain hemorrhage and his battle to survive it. Holly Robinson Peete was an excellent player of Celebrity Apprentice 2010 but her ruthless approach is a direct contract to Bret Michaels' quiet yet strong approach, which seems to have gained friends and fans on Celebrity Apprentice.
But it's all up to Donald Trump. The winner of the Celebrity Apprentice 2010 will be named May 23rd on NBC.
Here's the poll:
More opinion surveys on pollsb.com
Rock the Casbah!
Corrupt developers, landlords, contractors aided by City of NY? post by Suzannah B. Troy
p.s. Crain's reports another Bloomberg head leaves....Also note: I wrote Dan Doctoroff and warned him Bloomberg and
he was putting us, the people of New York in danger with a reckless tsunami of development on "old" New York's
infrastructure and that was before the Grand Central explosion that looked like a terror attack.
Doctoroff had some one from DEP write me back saying nothing to worry about....yeah right.
terror attack.
TWITTER doesn't have to make you a TWIT by: NIKKY RANEY
Okay, I think that there needs to be some new rules that dictate to public figures that just because you have a twitter/facebook does not mean that you should "dumb down" your speech. I am appalled that it has become socially acceptable (or appears to have become) for politicians to write that way online. I have an example from Sarah Palin's official twitter.
"Earth saw clmate chnge4 ions;will cont 2 c chnges.R duty2responsbly devlop resorces4humankind/not pollute&destroy;but cant alter naturl change" **
http://twitter.com/SarahPalinUSA/status/6823906156
**does she mean EONS?
That is her exact tweet. I have not altered, changed, or edited anything from the original tweet.
Since when is it acceptable to write this way? For those of you who will argue against me and say that it's "easier" or "Twitter's 140-character limit makes it difficult," that should not matter. Either shorten your tweet to 140 characters OR make multiple tweets. She could have made two separate tweets and got the message across.
Who is the target audience here? I had my 60-year-old father read this tweet. He struggled to read it out loud, and he was very frustrated while trying to understand what she was trying to say. If the target audience for her twitter are other adults, then she may have a problem. I asked some of my friends (college-aged) to read the tweet, and most of them also struggled.
I think that writing in such a way does not promote literacy or clarity. I don't think that as a politician, on her public (not personal/private), Twitter, she should be writing in a way that misrepresents her intelligence.
I think that it seems rushed and careless. I don't even make my Twitter that way, and my Twitter is a personal "request only" account.
I have done research and noticed that I am not the only one to give criticism to Sarah Palin. Other criticism includes
"TWITTER ACCOUNT OF A 9 YEAR OLD"
I am not intentionally attacking or "dissing" Sarah Palin for the way she uses her Twitter. I am simply using her as an example of what I have seen on Twitter that I believe is not acceptable. I do not think I am alone in my opinion. I jokingly said to my aunt in an e-mail, "She puts the TWIT in TWITTER," and that is what inspired this blog entry.
Don't forget to follow Zennie62 on twitter for the latest updates!
Posted by: Nikky Raney
If you have any concerns or any topics you think I should cover don't hesitate to contact me!