Tuesday, January 18, 2011

In response to TEARS FOR A KING

In her column yesterday reflecting on the meaning of celebrating Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday, Tears for a King, Michelle Dianne asked some pointed questions.

"We’re celebrating? From the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire to the molehills of Mississippi, freedom still fails to ring for millions of Americans and we’re celebrating?"

Michelle Dianne
17 January 2011

Let's define celebrate: to observe or commemorate, typically but not necessarily in a public way, an event, drawing attention to remind others what matters.

The quintessential example is likely "personal" non-holiday birthdays, which rarely (if ever) focus on the woman who gave birth, but instead serve as a reason to express affection, or at least acceptance, without eliciting suspicion of an agenda: we can say, or hear, "Happy Birthday" without looking for motivation beyond "You're OK in my reckoning," even between near strangers. It's a low-cost, low-risk social exchange.

Celebration takes on another dimension altogether when we celebrate an official holiday - when we observe the birthday of a political or religious figure that choice conveys our recognition of their enduring impact - the significance of their contributions to many lives.

In that sense King's holiday is celebration-worthy and, though I might sooner have chosen the anniversary of an event, I accept that his accomplishment went well beyond any one appearance or speech; for all he brought to the consciousness of both oppressed people and those who chose to look the other way, I applaud the Powers That Be (or, that "were" in this case) for ensuring we officially, collectively reflect on and commemorate the impact and importance of his philosophy, commitment, and courage.

It is right, in other words, that children in the United States in particular -- children who might otherwise never so much as hear King's name -- have reason in every school in the nation to learn how awful and un-equal things really were despite the lofty language in our Constitution and the so-called integration of our Armed Forces. History doesn't repeat itself, but people who don't know history may well repeat some mistakes rather than learn from them.
"The other day R. Lee Gordon asked the African American community on Facebook what it will take to put the “B” back in *Lack Unity; the brother got only two responses. Think about that and answer me this: What are we celebrating?"

Michelle Dianne
17 January 2011
I'm fervently in favor of celebrating King's life and the changes his actions stimulated; marking his birthday spreads the awareness, it keeps us from glossing over the past, and conveys that he's as relevant to our story as the officially-most-revered of our Presidents. What we celebrate is that the courage and certainty of King's actions moved us farther, faster in a critical direction than we'd have made it without him. King's holiday is an affirmation of our "all men are created equal" aspiration, and the power of people to grow and improve.

So while her closing question implying we may be making a mistake -- implying the need to think more about the meaning of the day -- was a good one, with much yet unaccomplished, with miles to go and promises of our founding fathers still un-met this cold, snowy January, I submit it is more important to ask routinely either, "How can/does our celebration inspire continuation of the progress toward true equality?" or, "What would Martin do?"
Whose woods these are I think I know.
His house is in the village, though;
He will not see me stopping here
To watch his woods fill up with snow.

My little horse must think it queer
To stop without a farmhouse near
Between the woods and frozen lake
The darkest evening of the year.

He gives his harness bells a shake
To ask if there is some mistake.
The only other sound's the sweep
Of easy wind and downy flake.

The woods are lovely, dark, and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep.


Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening
Robert Frost

Thomas Hayes is an entrepreneur, former Democratic Campaign Manager, journalist, and photographer who contributes regularly to a host of web sites on topics ranging from economics and politics to culture and community.

Wikileaks Julian Assange Up For "Best Founder" At Crunchies - #WikiLeaks

Julian Assange makes his presence felt!

The 2011 Crunchies, the annual awards event for the Tech Community produced by TechCrunch, VentureBeat, and Gigaom, is this Friday in San Francisco, and the voting underway (until Wednesday) reveals a nice surprise.

This blogger was the first to openly push for Wikileaks Editor-In-Chief Julian Assange to receive the "Best Startup Award." This for Wikileaks path-breaking impact on World Industrial Culture, showing just how powerful the Internet really is in its ability to rapidly disseminate important information.

Well, Wikileaks isn't up for Best Startup, but Julian Assange is up for "Best Founder."

Here's the list:

Founder of the Year
Julian Assange, WikiLeaks
Dennis Crowley, Foursquare
Jack Dorsey, Square
Kevin and Julia Hartz, Eventbrite
David Karp, Tumblr
Mark Pincus, Zynga

You can vote for Assange with a click here: VOTE.

Jersey Shore Season 3 Episode 2




Sammi has definitely distanced herself from the other females in the house - which is quite unfortunate on her part.

The rest of the girls seem to be having a blast, but Sammi tags along with Ronnie has he does his GTL. Sammi & Ronnie seem to be off in their own little world- but Ronnie makes it clear he misses his boys and would like to spend time with them.

This episode really stood out as one where the audience was screaming at their tvs at Sammi at all the things that she could have done to make it go a lot better. The biggest one was when Ronnie and Sammi missed Sunday night dinner - no one misses Sunday night family dinner. That is where everyone squashes the problems from that week.

A lot went on, but it is just really something to think about in regards to Sammi. This season is being filmed while the other season was airing.

Let's see what's up next.

Regis Philbin Tweets He Needs A Job - No Kidding!

Regis Philbin, who just said he was retiring on Regis and Kelly, got on Twitter with some interesting tweets (does he actually do it, or is it an intern?)

At any rate, it appears Regis still want to work, as he tweets:


Regis_and_Kelly Regis and Kelly
its not like dying, im just retiring from the show, by the way do you have a job for me, -r
2 hours ago Favorite Retweet Reply


Of course, that wasn't the only tweet...


Regis_and_Kelly Regis and Kelly
i announced my leaving our show today. david letterman just called, he said congratulations, i dont know if thats good or bad. -r
2 hours ago


Regis_and_Kelly Regis and Kelly
It's official... this morning Regis announced that he will retire from LIVE later this year.

And note that Regis says retiring, but I'll bet it's just from LIVE TV.

Regis Philbin Retires - Notre Dame Football Comments Will Be Missed

After a career that spans 50 years as a pioneer talk show host, Regis Philbin announced he's retiring. This is his last year, as the CelebTV video shows:



This blogger will miss Regis' rants about how well Notre Dame Football was or was not doing.

The Notre Dame Alumn never masked his love for the University, but his quips were a great chronicle of how poorly the team performed during most of the Charlie Weis years. And I thought he was going to need Pepto Bismal after the way Notre Dame started the season. But Regis was rewarded with a winning Fighting Irish 2010 tour, and a bowl game win.

Aside from that, Regis was a great complement to the hot, buffed, lovely Eelly Ripa, who expressed surprise over the news that Regis was retiring with "You're what?"

But, after that long in show business, and the record for the longest time on TV, Regis deserves a rest.  He's 77 years old, and his multi-generational work proves that a person can remain relevant at any stage of their life.

Google News Still Keeping Real Bloggers Out

The Italian authorities didn't know what to look for, and so let Google News off the hook by ending their investigation of anti-trust violations. It seems some news sites that opted not to be in Google News were claimed to have been site-delisted by Google entirely.

Google News admitted some problems and promised to change their ways.

The questions are, how and will that apply to America?

Google News is still playing favorites with The Associated Press, and kicking out bloggers from Google News.

Something must be done.

Stay tuned.

Monday, January 17, 2011

Sarah Palin Is Not A Good Person; Gabrielle Giffords Recovers

Imagine that U.S. Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords was your cousin, and you're Republican and like Sarah Palin. Obviously, you and Congresswoman Giffords don't see eye-to-eye on things, but you're still very proud of her. You also pay attention to news coverage of her, because, well, she's a congressperson and she's your cousin.

So, you pay attention to the exchange between Congresswoman Giffords and Palin of last March, where your cousin complained that Palin was marking her district with crosshairs, and think "Well, Palin didn't mean what she said about the whole crosshairs bullsye comments," but you do wish Palin would leave her alone.

(Palin as The Devil Wears Prada by Vanmol at Toonpool.com)

Then, as happened two Saturday's ago now, your cousin is shot by a nut. And here, you do think about what Palin did, and now just wish Giffords would get better. Here comes the accusations against Palin - you ignore them. And keep doing so, trying to put blinders on.

But then, Palin comes out and on the Wednesday of mourning for your cousin, and puts out a video that turns attention to herself.

If you have a heart of any kind, you know you'd not appreciate anyone treating your cousin that way. You know it.

But Palin's not done. She gets on Fox News' Hannity and defends the crosshairs map.

If by this point, you don't lose it, you don't have a heart.

And that's the point: Sarah Palin is not a good person.

A good person would not seek the spotlight while a person, a female elected official, is recovering from a gunshot to the head at point blank range that happened in an area that the spotlight seeker marked with crosshairs.

Did anyone ever think about what the relative of Gabrielle Giffords are going through? Certainly not Sarah Palin, who just keeps talking on insensitively.   Did Palin ever consider their feelings?  Does Palin care?

The answer is obviously, no.

If anyone in Palin's family went through what Giffords' has experienced, and was treated to the kind of insensitive words Palin said when she remarked "Peaceful dissent and discussion about ideas, that is what makes America exceptional. We won't allow that to be stifled by a tragic event in Arizona," they would go off.

(And consider this "tragic event" that happened was to one of Palin's enemies in the Health Care Reform issue, Gabrielle Giffords. Nice going Mrs. Palin.)

I really do wish Sarah Palin would understand that she's like acting like an unwelcome protester at a funeral. An appropriate comparison, since six people died in the Arizona Shooting, and Giffords almost became homicide number seven.

It would make everyone happy if Palin would just leave the funeral - or if she's not going to, at least express some respect for the dead and shut up.