Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Jon Huntsman Called Weasel, Runs For President

The definition of "weasel," aside from reference to the mammal described as a "small, active predator," is of a person who is a "deceitful or treacherous person," and by action "Achieve something by use of cunning or deceit: 'trying to weasel my way into his affections.'"

From the looks of videos and accounts, former Utah Governor and former U.S. Ambassador Jon Huntsman has been called a weasel, and now that person's running for the Republican Presidential Nomination.

Typing "Jon Huntsman Weasel" in Google yields an interesting set of findings.

First, there's a YouTube video that gives the former Utah Governor the 30th "Weasel Award," because Robert Evan Howard, the Salt Lake City man who created the video and the award, blames Huntsman for "people being taxed out of their homes in Utah" while he was Governor.

The video is not new, but hasn't been seen much at all over the past three years: 72 times total, or about 24 times a year, or about once every other week. That's about to change:



The other interesting "Jon Huntsman Weasel" search result on Google is this one:

"Looks like a weasel to me. Just sayin'."

And comes as a comment after a Huffington Post blog article with the title "Jon Huntsman Praised By China Vice Premier." The article by Huff Po staff ads:

"A fluent Mandarin speaker from his time as a Mormon missionary, Huntsman has won praise from the administration for his work as ambassador. But White House aides have been less than enthused by his interest in exploring a Republican presidential bid next year."

Which caused this blogger to wonder what kind of, as they say on the street, shit, Huntsman was plotting against President Obama while "serving" as U.S. Ambassador to China.

Anyone who can speak "fluent Mandarin," serves the American President in China, then turns around and announces he's going to try and run against that same American President, and is praised by the Chinese on the way, certainly places his very character into question. Did Huntsman throw his own boss under the bus while serving as Ambassador in China?

Fair question.

And all that on top of the finding that the blog "Weasel Zippers" has several pages devoted to the "Republican In Name Only" (RINO), Jon Huntsman.

If President Obama can't trust Jon Huntsman, why should the American people be asked to trust Jon Huntsman? Huntsman might sell us out to China more so than we're already economically on the hook for.

Just saying.

Oh, in case you're wondering.  I searched for a photo of Former Governor Huntsman to put up here, when I typed "Jon Huntsman Weasel" in Google, but that cute little critter kept popping up. 

Stay tuned.

Monday, June 20, 2011

Green Lantern and Super 8 Movie Review



Over the weekend, this blogger saw both much-anticipated films Green Lantern, and Super 8. Here's a quick review, as I head out of the door.

The Green Lantern movie wasn't as bad as a number of critics would have you believe, and the problem with their takes, is they didn't explain how the movie could be fixed. I will here.

I give it a 6.5 out of 10, and because the script took four story lines - Hal Jordan, Jordan / Green Lantern (Ryan Reynolds), Carol Harris (Blake Lively), and Hector (Peter Sarsgaard), and spent about 40 minutes of a two-hour film explaining them, then getting to the point.

By contrast, what marked Jurassic Park and Mission: Impossible Screenwriter David Koepp's success, was that he grew to understand the importance of getting the explanation done quickly, because everyone wanted to see the main event - in the case of Jurassic Park, the dinosaurs.

Having someone like David Koepp do the screenwriting would have made for a much better Green Lantern.

But there was that other problem: the CGI.

The flying bleed lines were evident in the 3D version, as Hal Jordan came in to meet Carol Harris as he was The Green Lantern for the first time. The audience grumbled.

How Warner Bros allowed that obvious error to get by is the question of the day.

For Super 8, such issues never popped up, but then it was a 2D movie!

What I liked about Super 8 was that J.J. Abrams obviously tried for a film that was a kind of homage to Steven Spielberg and he almost nailed it.

I don't know what the deal was with the use of grainy film, but other than that, it was a tight movie that wrapped you in its story and didn't let go. I would be surprised if it didn't get an Oscar best picture nomination.

Stay tuned.

Is “Queers for Avalos” Offensive? - SF Mayor's Race

Over at Able Dart's Bathroom Wall, the premier forum for online discussion of San Francisco political issues, one SF man who goes by "Chrysippus" took issue with the naming of a recent "John Avalos For Mayor" event called "Queers for Avalos," asserting that the term "Queer" was offensive, and that a straight person should not use it.

In the SF Mayor's Race, every meeting counts, including how it's named.

Frankly, the idea that the term "Queer" was offensive never occurred to me, but then I don't use it, and perhaps I don't have the sensitivities that a Gay person would have in this case. Plus, I grew up with such elements of pop-culture like the TV show Queer Eye For The Straight Guy.

Chrysippus states:

Gay supporters of John Avalos, mostly Milk Clubbers, have formed a group called “Queers for Avalos” (link below).

The use of the term “queers” to refer to gay people is offensive. The term implies that there’s something queer about being gay.

In fact, however, homophobia is what’s queer. Being gay is part of the natural spectrum of human experience. Hostility to people’s ability to love other members of their own gender is queer.

The term “queer” in reference to gay people is especially offensive when straights use it in this sense. And even more offensive, when straight politicians do so. And most offensive all, when done in the name of progressive politics.

I’ve been a gay activist since the 1960s, arrested nine times in gay liberation demonstrations, attacked and beaten.

I’m not queer. I’m not LGBT. I’m gay and proud.

Shame on John Avalos for being a party to this internalized homophobia on the part of the Milk Clubbers.

Here’s the link:

https://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=220413784644475

The blast from Chrysippus started a healthy debate over at The SF Wall, here's some samples:

westside progressive: Get with the times. The term "queers" has long ago been turned into a positive term by the queer community. I guess you're just grumpy because you weren't invited to the party.


Able Dart: I do believe from the above that the term "Queer" is in fact offensive to LGBT persons who prefer to see their identity as part of a larger society as opposed to those who wish to emphasize identity politics. Unless of course Westie want to venture down Queer Street again and claim that Wikipedia is a global conspiracy...


el Greco SF: What I find offensive are just plain "citizens" for Avalos.

From the looks of things, it appears the people who formed the event are Gay, not straight, and elected to use the term. That's there choice.

I don't think John Avalos should be held responsible for an event he did not form himself, or at least this one. Not to say any person running for office should attend every meeting that's formed for the person, no. I'm just saying that in this case, I don't see the big deal.

But then that's why I presented it, to learn if it was, indeed a big deal. After all, the use of one wrong term can impact the SF Mayor's Race.

I dated a wickedly brilliant woman for several years who, even with our sexual component, if you will, consistently called herself Lesbian, not Gay and certainly not "bi."

I never asked her why that was, perhaps because I was having too good a relationship with her at the time and didn't want to blow it with a philosophical argument. Lord knows we ended because of a much more concrete one!

Sunday, June 19, 2011

Blog Her Blood Drive For Erin Kotecki Vest, August 6, 2011

Erin Kotecki Vest, a blogger who's very active with Blog Her as its Social Media Strategist, needs your help. Frankly, I can't put the words together better than Lori Luna has on the Blog Her website. Here's part of what she wrote, or at least enough to give you a good idea of what's going on with Erin, and why your attending this blood drive, August 6, 2011 at The San Diego Convention Center is so important:

For Erin, without the assistance of plasma through her IVIG treatments, she would not have the ability to build her immune system, which as of today was at a scary zero, meaning she has absolutely no immune system. She cannot, on her own, fight off something so small as the common cold, never mind flu season. She lives in a world of constant hand washing, so much so that when her kids, ages 6 and 8, come home from school, the new normal is wash hands, then hug and kiss Mommy.

In her home there are a lot of new normals. It is now normal that “Mommy needs medicine in her arms” in order to be healthy and protect her major organs and live. This cocktail of medicine that enters through her arm includes much needed plasma; plasma that of course comes from blood donors like you and me. While plasma is not the single source that is keeping Erin alive, it is a critical element of her recovery and immune-building process.


For more information, click here, and remember that it's Saturday, August 6th, 2011, from 10:30 AM to 3:45 PM at The San Diego Convention Center, where the BlogHer 11 Convention will be.

You can also donate at your local blood bank.

Clarence Clemons Dies - Played In Mill Valley, October 2010



The legendary Clarence Clemons died at the young age of 69 and due to complications from a stroke he suffered last week. While Mr. Clemons is best known for his sax work with the iconic Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band, he's also fondly remembered as a frequent performer in the San Francisco Bay Area, most famously in Mill Valley.

Clemons is fondly remembered for his habit of showing up during open mic night at the now-closed Sweetwater bar, as well as for being a part of the Marin county community of musicians who put the town on the World's map.

Here, Clarence Clemons is shown in this YouTube video I found, playing with the "The Temple of Soul West," on October 22nd, 2010, and featuring Austin de Lone on keys, guitar, vocals; Jimmy Dillon on lead guitar; vocals by Paul Revelli; Eric McMann on drums; and Clemons providing "sax, vocals, and charm."

A sad day. Clarence Clemons is a known because, as Bruce Springsteen said, it was hard to tell where he separated from his sax. His amazing sound helped give Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band it's unique sound.


Clarence Clemons is a signpost on the Zeitgeist.

Saturday, June 18, 2011

Rudy's Can't Fail Cafe, Oakland, Gets Hammered On Yelp

Well, now that Rudy's Can't Fail Cafe is open in Downtown Oakland, in the Fox Theater at the Uptown District, it's time to ask "How's it doing?" When this blogger visited the eatery it was the first day of official public service - not crowded and the food and service were good.

But the next week, Rudy's had an "official grand opening," complete with Mayor Jean Quan and other people who may not visit Rudy's regularly, but had to be there - and that included the media.

So now, with all the hoopla out of the way, Rudy's is a known place. What's the verdict on it?

One visit to Yelp.com, the online hub for reviews on food places, can help answer that question. The answer is that visitors and Oaklanders are excited that Rudy's is open, and they gave me a great little tour of the place in this video, too:



But where Rudy's Can't Fail Cafe gets rave reviews for its space, it gets panned for its service on Yelp. Here's a few samples from Yelpers:

New as they are, it's pretty expected that they're working out a few kinks. Seeing as how they're offering this sometimes sketchy neighborhood (I say this as I used to live 2 blocks away) a respite for liquor soak-me-ups until 1am, Rudy's is a blessing and I look forward to making it my post-bar asylum. Also, if you're looking for grub at 7am, you can find a home here as well.

On the first Saturday it was open, I went with a friend and their computer system crashed and they had to close for about an hour while they rebooted it. They can't work without a computer? But in any case, I used to work for a restaurant and I understand that they're still trying to get everything worked out so we left and got chicken and waffles instead.

The food was pretty average, and a decent price. Apparently our food was held up by a large fish and chips back up in the kitchen, which turned out to be more like fish sticks-although tasty ones.

This places does serve alcohol and I adore that they had the balls to move into downtown and are until 1am (thank you!!) so I can walk over before or after the bar and get a bite. What a novel thought. All in all, I will be coming back because this is what the neighborhood needed, meaning there is a demand and I see it consistently busy with 20 and 30 somethings (and families, a great place for kids, if that's your style).

Love the space. We had very attentive service. I didn't chose well off of the menu but that was totally my bad. Love that they had several good beers on tap and a FULL bar. I need to come back during the full breakfast or brunch menu.


And here's part of one review from a really steam-blowing, pissed-off Yelper named Eddy S:

Rudy's Can't Fail Cafe... can fail. BIG TIME!

I was told I was being too harsh but Im sorry, a Taco Bell has their shit together better then this place. If I had an option of zero stars, I would choose it. This isn't just some rant from an unsatisfied customer but a mere observation from a person who expected nothing more and nothing less from any other restaurant. Below is a list of reasons why I gave it a low rating.

1) Just after saying that it was his first day, the water boy spilled a full cup over my friends shoulder.

2) It took two waiters to take our order (Ok. maybe someone was in training... but the other should have been on point). They still came back and said they didn't know if we wanted our burgers medium or medium rare.

3) I ordered their BBQ Pulled Pork Burrito (yes, I know. Don't expect too much or anything really from a cafe serving a burrito but anything would have been better then what they gave me) I received pulled pork wrapped in tortilla with beans and rice on the side. No, seriously. Just pulled pork in a tortilla and beans and rice on the side. If I wanted to make my own simple burrito I would, at home.

If that's what you're gonna serve then fine, but don't have the audacity to charge $10 for it. Seriously?

4) My friend ordered a BLT with A and the only thing they forgot was the A... seriously?

5) Last but certainly not least, our bill came out to $95 and some change. We collected $50.00 in cash from our crew and asked to split the remaining on two credit cards.

One friend received a credit for $75.00 and the other a credit for $20.00. EXCUSE ME! Did you really think we were giving you a $50 tip on a $95 bill.... are you seriously effing with me?

It's sad to say that this is my very first YELP and it had to be in Oakland. I love Oakland and the Fox Theatre but if this is my choice for late night meals then I will easily stick to my last resort... chips and another beer.

Goodnight.


In short, Rudy's is experiencing "opening restaurant growing pains," but those are generally borne of trying to service a lot of people, which means it's busy, and probably crazy busy after 12 midnight. That's good news, for Rudy's and good news for Oakland's economy.

Robert Reich Tells The Truth About the Economy



Leave it to one of my favorite economic professors, Robert Reich, The Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, to explain our economy in just two minutes, in this video sponsored by MoveOn.org. (My all time favorite economist is the late John Kenneth Galbraith.)

The basic point that Professor Reich is making is that there are not enough good jobs for the middle class because we allowed much of the manufacturing industry to leave America. Meanwhile, what he calls "The Super Rich" only pay 17 percent of their total income in taxes, causing massive budget deficits.

I think Professor Reich could have gone many steps beyond this, and made a six minute video. That video would have shown how costs for everything from cars to homes have increased beyond middle class incomes adjusted for inflation, and how that caused the giant wave of foreclosures.

But all this explaining of what happened is fine; we need to come up with a solution, and do it ASAP.

Stay tuned.