Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Chloe has Amanda Seyfried and Julianne Moore in lesbian sex scandal

Chloe is a new movie due out in March that's getting buzz for its daring lesbian sex scandal storyline that features Amanda Seyfried.




According to The Daily Mail UK, it features 24-year-old Amanda Seyfried in a hot relationship with 49-year old Julianne Moore who's character Catherine, hires the escort Chloe to seduce her husband, played by Liam Neeson, and who she suspects is cheating on her.



But the two meet in hotel bar and after some chat, Julianne Moore yanks off Amanda Seyfried's blouse before the two engage in a passionate kiss. The movie tagline is "She invited Chloe into her life, her home and her marriage. Big mistake."




Chloe is a remake of the french film of the same name and is directed by Atom Egoyan. The release date is March 10, 2010. It the second girl-on-girl kissing movie for Amanda Seyfried, the first being Jennifer's Body, when she locked lips with the sultry Megan Fox.

Stay tuned.

Jack Del Rio to replace Pete Carroll at USC? Not so fast

Reports are swirling that Jacksonville Jaguars Head Coach Jack Del Rio will replace outgoing USC Head Coach Pete Carroll, who's about to join the Seattle Seahawks as their new head coach in a press conference today. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer claims that USC sent a contract offer to Jack Del Rio Monday.

While Jack Del Rio is a popular selection and ESPN reported last night that USC had their sights set on him, Jack Del Rio placed ice on that claim today, according to the USA Today. Del Rio said...

"That's all speculation and hype. All of those things are manufactured. The only thing I can tell you is I've been busy working on the Jaguars for 2010. We're busy at work, trying to build this team strong. All of those other things are a figment of other people's imaginations."


Jack Del Rio's record with the Jacksonville Jaguars is 58-57, the team finished at 7 and 9 in 2009 and missed the playoffs, and while he has a great relationship with team owner Wayne Weaver, reportedly Del Rio is to meet with Weaver for a review of the season this week.

Del Rio has an active contract with the Jacksonville Jaguars which has $15 million remaining that would have to be bought-out if he were to move to USC.

Stay tuned.

Roxxxy sex robot lifesized girlfriend debuts at at AEE 2010

In what's sure to be viewed as a wrong-way direction for social change, "Roxxxy" the robot lifesized girlfriend was introduced at AEE 2010, the Adult Entertainment Expo in Las Vegas. Roxxxy robot lifesized girlfriend is a anatomically correct facsimile of a woman dressed for sex, and with "servos" and other electronics to make it seem, well, real. It's maker calls it the first "sex robot."

Violet Blue, where are you?

Roxxxy robot lifesized girlfriend was created by former Bell Labs employee Douglas Hines, who's overweight, balding, bespectacled look fits the perfect image of a guy who would make such a thing.

Douglas Hines says that he developed Roxxxy robot lifesized girlfriend after losing a friend in the 9-11 terrorist attack. Just who that friend is, Douglas Hines does not say, leaving one to wonder if he just spent too much money at strip clubs.

Roxxxy robot lifesized girlfriend is designed to respond to touch: a grab of her wrist causes her to "say" something depending on the personality type that's installed. The whole thought bring the question of how Douglas Hines actually tested the product.

Roxxxy robot lifesized girlfriend is the first in what is going to be a line of products by "True Companion", including, for women, a male version called Rocky.

But why make this, really, is anyone's guess.

What is disturbing is that in the video below the Roxxxy sex robot just sits there in an open position. It does nothing and would seem to be the perfect image of what Douglas Hines wants his women to do: nothing and just lay there. Be, well, submissive. In the video, this blogger was longing to see Roxxxy robot slap the crap out of Douglas Hines, but he didn't program it to do that. But perhaps you can because Hines says you can "create your dream personality" to have.



But if it's 2010 and we have Roxxxy sex robot lifesized girlfriend, what will 2020 bring? What this shows is technology replacing the need for human contact in everything from phones where people send texts, to invisible online commenters on forums, to this. Perhaps one good thing is that men who elect to go in this direction tske themselves out of the pool of us who love the real thing.

Stay tuned.

Spider-Man drops Tobey McGuire and Sam Rami; Taylor Lautner?

In what has been viewed as a massive film business blunder, the Spider-Man property dropped Tobey McGuire and Sam Rami after a dispute over script direction. But there's word that Avatar Director James Cameron still has "fire" to do a Spider-Man film. And, speculatively, the stage could be set for Taylor Lautner to be the new Peter Parker.



Taylor Lautner

According to Nikke Finke at Deadline Hollywood, the creative problems led to a dispute that on Monday, officially ended the Spider-Man relationship between Columbia Pictures, Marvel Comics, Tobey McGuire, and Sam Rami, who starred in and directed the first three blockbuster films.

The problems started in December 2009, and with a Spider-Man 4 script written by screenwriters Jamie Vanderbilt, David Lindsay-Abaire, and Gary Ross, that according to Aint It Cool News, had something to do with Peter Parker, Mary Jane, and a baby. It's widely reported that Sam Rami hated the script, and didn't feel he could make a May 11, 2011 deadline with the technical demands it called for.

Finke reports that once Sam Rami said he was out, Columbia Pictures' Matt Tolmach and Sony Pictures co-chairman Amy Pascal wanted to "reboot" the franchise, in the way that J.J. Abrams was assigned to reboot the Star Trek franchise.

Reportedly, Rami wanted a script from Spider-Man Producer Laura Ziskin's husband and script writer for the Spider-Man 2 and 3 movies, Alvin Sargent. But Finke reports that her sources said the movie can't be made given the script issue, unless the script could be fast-tracked. To this date, as of this writing, that has not happened. Originally, the date for filming was February, and now it's undetermined. What is sure is that Alvin Sargent's working on a new script that involves Peter Parker in high school.

For several reasons, this blogger thinks Sony and Columbia have Taylor Lautner in mind for the new Peter Parker role. This is a hypothesis, but consider that Taylor Lautner is 17, right at high school age and has a strong 13 to 17 demographic that studios have been hot to capture of late (Miley Cyrus, for example). Moreover, Pascal says - and fans hate - that Sony and Columbia want to explore Peter Parker's teenage years and how he deals with those problems.  That's a perfect vehicle for Taylor Lautner, who's now a hot property after the success of Twilight: New Moon.

In other words, they didn't want to deal with an adult Peter Parker for business reasons.

As for the reaction to all of this, fans are divided over at Aint It Cool News, but some patterns are obvious: first, many didn't like Tobey McGuire as Peter Parker because they didn't feel he matched the comic book version. Second, fans hate the idea of a Spider-Man reboot for a franchise that doesn't need one. Star Trek did and everyone knew it. Differences aside, the Spider-Man formula worked, even if Spider-Man 3 was too heavy on special effects and not on story. Tobey McGuire brought a certain innocence to the role that's hard to replicate.

Who will replace Sam Rami has not been determined, but Aint It Cool News reported a conversation with Avatar Director James Cameron at last year's Comic Con, who told Harry Knowles of AICN that he still has the "fire" in him to do a movie based on a treatment he penned several years ago, and is not intimidated by the success of the first three movies.

Stay tuned. The press release is below:


Culver City, CA (January 11, 2010) -- Peter Parker is going back to high school when the next Spider-Man hits theaters in the summer of 2012.
Columbia Pictures and Marvel Studios announced today they are moving forward with a film based on a script by James Vanderbilt that focuses on a teenager grappling with both contemporary human problems and amazing super-human crises.

The new chapter in the Spider-Man franchise produced by Columbia, Marvel Studios and Avi Arad and Laura Ziskin, will have a new cast and filmmaking team. Spider-Man 4 was to have been released in 2011, but had not yet gone into production.

“A decade ago we set out on this journey with Sam Raimi and Tobey Maguire and together we made three Spider-Man films that set a new bar for the genre. When we began, no one ever imagined that we would make history at the box-office and now we have a rare opportunity to make history once again with this franchise. Peter Parker as an ordinary young adult grappling with extraordinary powers has always been the foundation that has made this character so timeless and compelling for generations of fans. We’re very excited about the creative possibilities that come from returning to Peter's roots and we look forward to working once again with Marvel Studios, Avi Arad and Laura Ziskin on this new beginning,” said Amy Pascal, co-chairman of Sony Pictures Entertainment.

“Working on the Spider-Man movies was the experience of a lifetime for me. While we were looking forward to doing a fourth one together, the studio and Marvel have a unique opportunity to take the franchise in a new direction, and I know they will do a terrific job,” said Sam Raimi.

“We have had a once-in-a-lifetime collaboration and friendship with Sam and Tobey and they have given us their best for the better part of the last decade. This is a bittersweet moment for us because while it is hard to imagine Spider-Man in anyone else’s hands, I know that this was a day that was inevitable,” said Matt Tolmach, president of Columbia Pictures, who has served as the studio’s chief production executive since the beginning of the franchise. “Now everything begins anew, and that’s got us all tremendously excited about what comes next. Under the continuing supervision of Avi and Laura, we have a clear vision for the future of Spider-Man and can’t wait to share this exciting new direction with audiences in 2012.”

"Spider-Man will always be an important franchise for Sony Pictures and a fresh start like this is a responsibility that we all take very seriously," said Michael Lynton, Chairman and CEO of Sony Pictures. "We have always believed that story comes first and story guides the direction of these films and as we move onto the next chapter, we will stay true to that principle and will do so with the highest respect for the source material and the fans and moviegoers who deserve nothing but the best when it comes to bringing these stories and characters to life on the big screen."



Tom Hayes: Consequences of "gotcha politics" aimed at Senator Reid

Melissa Harris-Lacewell offers an excellent perspective in her piece "What Reid's Race Gaffe Tells Us About Inequality" today at The Nation. Nobody's surprised that the opposition party would leap on such a gaffe, but if they really want to accomplish change they'd be focused on more than one politician. The focus has clearly been a virtual frenzy - a "tar-and-feather the heathen" first, ask questions later approach - the sort of "gotcha" that McCain and other prominent GOP members famously claim to oppose.

Is Senator Reid above criticism? Absolutely not. His choice of language reveals something of his social context and the resultant view of the world. Clearly conversations about race in his circle are lacking, and his experience is insulated from the way most Americans live.

But creating what political theorist Nancy Fraser calls, "a difference-friendly world, where assimilation to majority or dominant cultural norms is no longer the price for equal respect," isn't what the elite right-wing strategists or the supporting talk-show punditocracy is calling for, (or presumably hoping to achieve.) Their goals appear much less lofty: attack the party of the President to weaken his political influence, one member of Congress at a time.

Naturally some of GOP politicos and voters are applauding the response to the gaffe. But rather than the tactics Americans who want to reclaim moral high-ground while rebuilding the leadership role for their country on the world stage need to succeed, these reveal a willingness to return to the arrogant do-anything, say-anything tactics of fear for short-term political advantage that most Americans voted to curtail in 2008.



Thomas Hayes
is an entrepreneur, journalist, and political analyst who contributes regularly to a host of web sites on topics ranging from economics and politics to culture and community.

Mark McGwire's steroids cry means Barry Bonds stays silent



Mark McGwire shocked the Sports World Monday with his explanation that he did indeed take steroids and performance enhancing drugs through his career in Oakland and all the way to his record setting 1998 season when he broke the Single-Game Home Run Record. Mark McGwire issued this statement Monday:

“I remember trying steroids very briefly in the 1989/1990 off season and then after I was injured in 1993, I used steroids again. I used them on occasion throughout the ’90s, including during the 1998 season. I wish I had never touched steroids. It was foolish and it was a mistake. I truly apologize. Looking back, I wish I had never played during the steroid era.”

The statement turned Major League Baseball upside down, but don't look for former San Francisco Giants Slugger Barry Bonds to say he used steroids anytime soon. To do so, in Barry's mind, would mean that "the system" beat him.

 Barry Bonds wants to beat "the system" because he sees it as racist. This view, and he has some fair reason to assert this, has unfortunately backed him into a corner that he's going to remain in for the rest of his life.

For Barry Bonds to admit any use of steroids absent under immunity, which he should have been granted long ago, is to perjure himself and write his ticket to jail. Anyone who's foolish enough to say or write that Barry Bonds should say he used steroids knows this. Moreover, in Barry's mind, he's already said he didn't know what he was being given. Proving that he did know is next to impossible.

Meanwhile, Barry Bonds rests with the belief that had he been white and broke McGwire's record, there would not have been the tremendous scrutiny placed on him. As one of my blogger friends Hodaka Kajita wrote in 2004, Barry Bonds was the target of sports reporters who "have hoarded Bonds in order to extract a comment that tarnishes his public image."

Of course, Hodaka's blog post caused a good debate, and that will continue today. But the bottom line is Barry Bonds felt he was the target of a racist witch hunt, author David Zirin believed this as well and expressed it in 2006, and I agree with both Bonds and Zirin.

Mark McGwire was given kid glove treatment in part because he's white and in part because he's a nice person. There's no argument here that some of Barry Bonds problems have been caused by the perception that he has an alleged legendary attitude, but even this is in question. Skip Bayless pointed to Sports Illustrated's Rick Reilly as the person who stsrted the torrent of "Bad Barry" columns and pres.

Bayless said this is so because San Francisco Giants' Jeff Kent, who didn't at all get along with Bonds at the time, was filling Reilly's notebook with negative Barry Bonds information and Reilly was soaking it up. Meanwhile, it was Jeff Kent who had the bad attitude according to Deadspin.

So all of that can be distilled to this: Barry Bonds is backed into a corner such that talking the way Mark McGuire did on Monday would give him a trip to the slammer for perjury and obstruction of justice.  Bonds has nothing to gain from "pulling a McGuire" and letting his enemies get the best of him.

Meanwhile, the real question is what did the Commissioner of Baseball know about this and when.  I personally don't believe he didn't know what was going on because too much money was at take not to.  All of this was in the middle of a home-run race that fueled the creation of a baseball stadium boom that gave us everything from Camden Yards in Baltimore to AT&T Park in San Francisco.  

AT&T Park is the house that Barry Bonds built.  I believe he knows it and so does MLB Commissioner Bud Selig.

Stay tuned.

Monday, January 11, 2010

Breast cancer survivors: Am I cured yet?


pink ribbon
Image via Wikipedia


[Republished from DocGurley.com with permission]


October has become so synonymous with Breast Cancer Awareness month that it's almost a total pink-out. Signs, stores, and even scarves urge us to stamp out breast cancer. And following on October's (high) heels this year was the Mammogram Media-Monstrosity (for a bullet-sized version, check out #9 in the Doc Gurley Year in Review: Top Ten Health Lessons of 2009, or, for a more detailed look at the issue, check out the article, Battle of the Breasts: 16 Crucial Facts for You to Know). Now that we're into a new year, it's a good time to reflect on, well, life. Specifically, life after breast cancer. What with all the hula-baloo about prevention and screening, I'm thinking that the people who've already been diagnosed might have been just a wee bit overlooked.

So how do you embrace health post-breast-cancer? And what's with the weird reluctance of doctors to use the C-word ("cured")? Are there important, simple steps you can take to tilt the odds in your favor for living well? These are the kinds of issues you don't hear so much about in the news - despite the fact that shockingly large numbers of us know and love a mother, sister, friend or daughter who's been diagnosed. To cover some of these issues, I had the pleasure of talking with the charming Zennie - who's very interested in this topic on behalf of his mother. More and more we LIVE with diagnoses and diseases. And that's a good thing. But often we're left trying to decipher life-style advice, and, as research shows that our groups of family and friends is crucial to success, lots of us want to know what might help. So here are some recent, positive research results that you can consider when it comes to life after breast cancer.

Obligatory disclaimer: An article (ANY article) is, in no way, a replacement for actual medical care, and should not be mistaken for personal medical advice. When it comes to random, non-customized medical discussion, take to heart the message that the deep voice says (at the end of gazillions of soft-focus pharmaceutical ads) and see your doctor.

1) The "C-word." Or, why won't my doctor say I'm cured? Doctors don't tend to say that anyone is cured, and even just the absence of that word feels like a heartbreaker for many people. Refusing to say you're cured feels like a HUGE statement that professionals may be lacking-faith in your future. But that's not true. So why won't doctors say it? At it's worst, you could say that doctors don't generally pronounce anyone cured because the doctor is worried it will come back to haunt them if a patient relapses - after all, no doctor can tell the future. At its best, you could say that life is a continuum, that finding a breast cancer and treating it is the beginning of a process - a lifelong process of prioritizing your health. So what kinds of things can a person do to promote health after a diagnosis of breast cancer?

2) Should I lose weight? Exercise? Even at 60? What's clear is that being overweight significantly increases your risk of getting breast cancer in the first place. But what about after you've been diagnosed - should you lose weight? The answer is still being debated. But some well-done research shows that obese patients have worse outcomes, even after diagnosis, and even when you control for the same stage of tumor. What is clear is that promoting your health is a good thing. Eating well, walking everywhere, lifting weights three times a week for as little as 20 minutes at a time - all those things are important to your health. Simple steps can make a big difference - cut out all sugar drinks, including those with sugar-substitutes (become an unsweetened water/tea/coffee-only person!) and buy smaller plates to help with portion control. But keep in mind, fixating on weight-loss alone is probably not a healthy approach - instead, focus on nurturing yourself with only the best. You deserve it, and, heck, you're in this for the long-haul. These changes will help protect you from other significant diseases too. Lifting weights, for example, is important since many of the drugs women take after breast cancer can cause osteoporosis, or thinning of your bones. Lifting weights helps combat this. It's never too late to start - exercise and eating well can make a difference, even in the very elderly.

3) Vitamin D? More and more studies are showing a strong connection between low vitamin D, breast cancer and survival - even after diagnosis. In fact, in my opinion, if vitamin D was a patented drug, it would have more ads running continuously than any other pill (and that's saying a lot!). Here's the deal - vitamin D is about the only thing that doesn't just boost your immune system, it also makes it work smarter (a really hard thing to do!). In contrast, indiscriminately boosting your immune system can result in cases where your immune system attacks the wrong thing, or flares in a way that's, frankly, ineffective. But, keep in mind, you CAN overdose on vitamin D - so it's important to know where your body is living, and then optimize it. You want your vitamin D level well into the normal range - luckily, finding out is a simple, easy blood test. Your doctor can help you safely dose up to a good range, then make sure you stay there.

4) Do I have to take pills forever? Here's one of those good new/bad news kind of situations. Women tend to get two very distinct types of breast cancer - those cancers that have a receptor for estrogen, and those that don't. In general, it's much better to get the kind of breast cancer that "feeds" on estrogen. Studies have shown that type of tumor, in large groups of patients, is much more likely to be treatable without recurrence. That's the good news. The "bad" news is that studies also show survival can be definitely improved for groups of patients who take an estrogen-blocking pill for 5 or more years. Even if the tumor comes back! There are now pills that a patient should be taking for ten years after a diagnosis - even if the diagnosis was at age 81! In another of the weird good news/bad news twists, women who get joint pains from taking one of these pills, Femara, are less likely to have the tumor come back (now that's a motivation for enduring some joint pain if there ever was one!).

6) Sleeping, drinking and smoking: The good, the bad and the ugly. Sleep is good for you. While there are no huge, well-designed studies showing a strong link between sleep and disease-free survival from breast cancer, sleep IS associated with a better-functioning immune system, as well as improvement in many other health areas like blood pressure, and diabetes. Many Americans (if not most, in some subgroups) are just not getting enough sleep. Why take the time to make sleep a priority? Sleep is free, has no side-effects, and generally beneficial to your overall health and mood. I believe it's also a marker of other life issues - if you're unable to get enough sleep, there are probably other things impacting your health (like a high-stress life that can result in grab-and-go-bad-food-choices, and a lack of exercise, for example). Alcohol, on the other hand, when it comes to breast cancer, may be bad for you. Most of us have heard that alcohol, in moderation, can be beneficial for some heart disease prevention. [What does "moderation" mean? For women, zero-to-one drinks per night, with a max of less than 7 a week, for sure.] What many of us may not have have heard, however, is that many studies show that alcohol is not good for breast cancer - in fact, the larger the number of alcoholic drinks a week, the worse the risk. If you're living post-breast-cancer diagnosis, when it comes to alcohol, you want to be the picture of moderation. In fact, teetotalling may be the way to go. So if sleep may be the good, and alcohol the bad, smoking is just flat out the ugly. Smoking, and even passive smoke exposure, are associated with breast cancer. Getting a diagnosis can be the wake-up call to help see you through a solid quit. You'll reap mega benefits for ALL your health.

7) Mammograms...what's the point? Once you've been diagnosed with breast cancer, your regular screening becomes even more important. Recurrences can be treated too - and the earlier the better. It's important to not become discouraged (or worse yet, to despair). After the emotional shock of a diagnosis, it can be really hard to remember that finding a cancer is better than NOT finding one (until it's too late...).

So if you know, love, or care about a person who's living with a diagnosis of breast cancer, what can you do to help promote health after treatment is over? Here are some tips - keeping in mind that nagging is never a good way to go, but loving support, and encouragement can make a world of difference!

1) Be eager to move too. Exercise works best when done with a social group, at every age. Take the time to drive grandma to the mall for a gentle stroll each Sunday. Form a lunch-walking or Tai Chi group. Be the person who makes moving fun for those you love! 2) Encourage appropriate testing - mammograms and regular doctor visits (especially waiting for results!) can be grueling rocky experiences without support from those who care. Be aware, and be there, if you care. 3) Help your loved one to remember to ask about a vitamin D test at her next doctor's appointment. Spread the word! 3) Eat well. Just as with exercise, good eating works best when those around you are supportive. Don't be the person who sighs heavily and says, while gazing at the salad, how much nicer some spicy chicken wings would be. But also don't be a criticizer. Mindful nurturing is the way to go when it comes to improving your diet. As Michael Pollan says, "Eat food, not too much. Mostly plants."

What do you think? Got some tips to share for those who care? Post them in the comments section. Get on the Twitter bandwagon and follow Doc Gurley! Also check out Doc Gurley's joyhabit and iwellth twitter feeds - so you can get topic-specific fun, effective, affordable tips on how to nurture your joy and grow your wellth this coming year.



Got a thingie on your doohickey? Or are you pondering how to tell your doctor he's a jerk? Send your burning healthcare questions to Doc Gurley by emailing docgurleyatgmaildotcom. Doc Gurley cannot answer every question, and she cannot practice medicine through a keyboard (not even with her stethoscope pressed firmly against the monitor) but be assured - your questions will be kept strictly confidential and identifying traits are changed.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]