Thursday, October 15, 2009

Perez Hilton on Lady GaGa tour dates; Ga Ga wrong on Obama

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com


Lady GaGa

Perez Hilton uses his million Twitter follower base to help Lady GaGa annouce her tour dates for her upcoming galavanting she was going to do with Kanye West.

Lady GaGa announces new tour! Check out the dates and locations HERE http://bit.ly/3Pl4jJ about 6 hours ago from web

Lady GaGa, meanwhile was in Washington DC as part of the Human Rights Campaign Dinner last Saturday and President Obama was her "opening act".

There Lady GaGa yelled for President Obama - who's now in San Francisco or at least on his way as of this writing - to take rapid action in changing the laws to extend full civil rights for Gays and Lesbians. She yelled the President's name - almost screaming.

But I think her effort was misplaced. She should be yelling at the Senators and Congresspeople who stand in the way of progress. Yelling at Obama only helps them and hurts him.

But I do like that she's involved. Now, if we only had some real grass roots fundraisers. In fact, I talk about that here...

LIMBAUGH IS GIVEN THE SHAFT


 
LIMBAUGH IS GIVEN THE SHAFT
 
By The Gambler [J.Gamble] For Football Reporters Online
 
When did American’s become so damn judgmental?  Land of the free. Home of the brave. Remember that? Freedom of speech. Freedom of the press. Does any of this exist anymore?
 
Now, I’m no Rush Limbaugh fan. I don’t dislike him either. He is an American with his own ideas, friends, beliefs and opinions. No different than the rest of us. What makes him stand out is the fact that he has had a radio show for many years. And on his show he is staunchly dedicated to furthering the beliefs, core values and lifestyle of the right-wing, conservative, rich, white society he is immersed in. He has a unique and advantageous professional platform, and he uses it. It is an opinion show. There are no right or wrong answers. But his opinion is the overriding one on his show.
 
All things being said, Limbaugh should have been allowed to continue as part of a group seeking to buy the Rams. Limbaugh was to be a limited partner in a bid led by St. Louis Blues chairman Dave Checketts, but Checketts said in a statement Wednesday that Limbaugh's participation had complicated the effort. The group would move forward without him. The group succumbed to a wicked media backlash and a vocal protest by the head of the NFL Players Union. Colts owner Jim Irsay said he would vote against the bid as well. Commissioner Roger Goodell even threw his two cents in, saying Limbaugh’s “divisive” comments would not be tolerated.
 
Limbaugh’s reputation as a “hate monger” -- as FOX Sports columnist Jason Whitlock called him in a recent column – hit a pentacle when he was ousted as part of The MNF team back in 2003, after making racially charged comments about Philadelphia Eagles QB Donovan McNabb. He was also caught in a pill-popping illegal prescription drug dependency, which made him look like a hypocrite.  Still, he continued to express his deeply conservative and often offensive views on his radio show. And that made him too hot. It seems his boys had to back out on him in order to get this done. Either way, I’m sure he’ll still remain as a “silent partner” of sorts. A lot of people see this as a victory for the left and racial sensitivity in sports. Al Sharpton was vocally ecstatic. Limbaugh has said this is a direct attack by Democrats and liberals to destroy prominent conservatives.  I don’t particularly agree with either of those assertions.
 
I do however agree with Limbaugh when he says “this is about the future of The United States of America and what kind of country we’re going to have. “ 
 
I don’t think he should have been dropped. I think his team should have stood behind him and fought this issue to the fullest extent of the law. NFL owners shouldn’t be able to deny a bid based on anything but financial health.  If Limbaugh is stopped because of some touchy views he had about McNabb, then anyone can be stopped from purchasing a team just because they have different views than the other owners.
 
No wonder there aren’t any black NFL owners yet. Reggie Fowler attempted to buy the Vikings in 2005 for $625 million dollars. Fowler was to become the first African-American principal of an NFL team, and he seemed to have all his ducks in a row. But the owners didn’t approve his purchase. He couldn’t get into the old boys club. The basis of this denial, however, was discrepancies and a lack of confidence and in Fowler’s financial portfolio.
 
Everyone is so touchy these days. Noone can say what they really feel any more in fear of being persecuted and cast aside as a bigot. America is a country where every man has an opportunity to pursue the many offerings of life.  A person’s beliefs should never deny them that opportunity. If Rush has the doe. Let him buy the team. There are rules, systems and bodies put in place to police bigotry and biased practices in the work place.
 
This opens up a can of worms that can affect all ethnicities and beliefs. The NFL is openly stating that if you don’t share the values and morals of the majority, then you are subject to being cast aside and labeled a “hate monger”. That is a dangerous direction for our country. Nets owner Jay-Z has admittedly sold drugs and continues to glorify it in his songs, but he is still considered fit to own a pro franchise. Why is Limbaugh attacked with such fervor?
 
Diversity has been the fabric of our uniqueness and success as a nation. People with different opinions and believes having to co-exist for the good of society. We can’t pretend people grew up the same. We are not robots. We all disagree with people who don’t share our core values. That’s what makes us strong people. Debate.
 
Limbaugh deserves the opportunity to mess up, before he is shown the door. His dream was taken because he was man enough to speak his mind. Right or wrong, my granddad told me America was built on the backs of people with strong beliefs and foundations. These days, I guess as long as you are spewing nonsense on a reality show, you are safe. If you discuss real issues, that spur emotion and conflict, you don’t fit in anymore. The image-conscious NFL doesn’t need right-wing radio hosts drawing attention away from the product on the field. We understand that. But I think down the line, we will see the negative effects of NFL owner decisions that are based on no real criteria other than a difference of opinion.      
 

NFC South Wrap Up Week 5


                       NFC South Wrap Up Week 5
 
By Rafael Garcia
Sr. Contributing Writer Football Reporters Online
Southeast Region
 
Carolina 20 Washington 17
For the Panthers it was just a matter of a win any way they could get it. Well they had to sweat it out but got the win when Jonathan Stewart ran in from eight yards with just over nine minutes left in the game. Jake Delhomme came in needing to exercise the demons that have been haunting him since last year’s playoff debacle. He threw his eight interception of the season but that would mean nothing to him later and now the Panthers are in the win column thanks in part to 18 unanswered points. Delhomme was 16-25 for 181 yards and one touchdown pass. He still has plenty of work to do as he has only three touchdown passes this year and is still trying to get in his rhythm. The running game was also stagnant too as Stewart and DeAngelo Williams combined for 79 yards on 28 carries. One thing for sure is the Redskins and their coach are in some trouble now as the Skins continue their slide and it is only a matter of time before fans start to call for the head of coach Jim Zorn. Carolina is still having problems holding onto the football as they had four more fumbles and lost one. Next week they get a chance at two in a row when they go to Tampa Bay.
 
Philadelphia 33 Tampa Bay 14
Well so much for Tampa getting their first win against a Philly team that had their number one quarterback in the lineup again. Donovan McNabb returned and simply lit up the Bucs for 264 yards on 16-21 with three touchdown passes and no picks. Two of those were to Jeremy Maclin who continues to impress in his rookie year. Maclin finished with 142 yards on 6 catches as the Tampa defense offered very little resistance. The Tampa Bay offense was led by young QB Josh Johnson’s 26-50 for 240 yards and two touchdowns. He also threw three picks and fumbled twice losing one. Tampa is now on a nine game losing streak dating back to last December when they stumbled their way out of the playoffs. First year head coach Raheem Morris is still searching for his first NFL win.
 
Atlanta 45 San Francisco 10
This was one of those games where one team got outmatched, out muscled and outplayed. The 49ers started the season strong under head coach Mike Singletary. If not for one play they could have started 4-0. Players like TE Vernon Davis went from the dog house to a go to receiver. Then came game time where the Falcons would rip any confidence they had. I mean it was a whipping of the worst kind. Falcons wide receiver Roddy White had 185 yards by halftime and finished with 210 on eight catches with two touchdowns. one was a 90-yard beauty to put Atlanta up 14-0. At halftime it was 35-10 and basically the Niners were done. Matt Ryan was 22-32 for 329 yards and two scores. Michael Turner chipped in with three touchdowns rushing and 97 yards. So Atlanta moves to 3-1 and look to keep pace with the Saints who face the Giants next week.

Seven & Out – Week V




Seven & Out – Week V
By Michael – Louis Ingram Associate Editor/Director of Scouting=Football Reporters Online
FRO/BASN
 
PHILADELPHIA (FRO/BASN): The word from On High is out about Week 5 in the NFL; so we come bearing gifts - (or is it gifting Bears?) Either way, here’s seven bowls of porridge for you…
 
Dallas wide receiver MILES AUSTIN had 10 catches for a team-record 250 yards and two touchdowns in the Cowboys’ 26-20 overtime victory at Kansas City.  Austin, who had a 60-yard game-winning TD reception in OT, is the 10th player in NFL history to record at least 10 catches, 250 yards and two touchdowns in a game.  He is the only one of those 10 to record the game-winning score in overtime.
 
(Oh, yeah – and Dallas needed every damn yard in order to avoid a major upset by the Chiefs {nee Dallas Texans!} What I find really interesting is how the accounts of the heroic comeback of the quarterback pales in comparison to that of who actually did the heavy lifting; in this case, Austin – who, like Patrick Crayton & Sam Hurd, spoke glowingly as to how a former teammate helped them become professionals. Some guy named Terrell Owens…)
 
In addition to Austin, Atlanta wide receiver RODDY WHITE had eight catches for a team-record 210 yards and two touchdowns in the Falcons’ 45-10 win at San Francisco.  This marks the second time in NFL history that two receivers each recorded at least 200 receiving yards and two TD catches on the same day (Kansas City’s STEPHONE PAIGE and Houston’s DREW HILL, December 22, 1985). 
 
(I am wondering when the Devil plans to come and knock on Roddy White’s door to either ask for the hands he had grafted on him, or for his soul. While I now say this facetiously, White has come a long way as a receiver.  He still has a lot further to go, however, before being given consideration as one of the league’s elite. For arguments’ sake, let’s say, ohh, Randy Moss, Andre “Soundwave” Johnson, Larry Fitzgerald, Calvin “Megatron” Johnson, Owens, Brandon Marshall, Reggie Wayne, Vincent Jackson, Steve Smith, Steve Smith {no I didn’t stutter; the Giants ‘ Smith is just as good} Anquan Boldin, Chad Ocho Cinco, Hines Ward, Santonio Holmes, Santana Moss, Torry Holt, Isaac Bruce, Antonio Bryant, Desmond Mason, Donald Driver, Chris Chambers, Dwayne Bowe, Wes Welker, Jericho Cotchery, Lavernaues Coles, T.J. Houshmandzadeh, Greg Jennings, Lee Evans and maybe two or three I can’t think of off the top of my head – then we’ll talk!)      
 
 
Arizona quarterback KURT WARNER passed for 302 yards in the Cardinals’ 28-21 victory over Houston.  It marked the 50th career 300-yard passing performance of his career, the fifth-most in NFL history.  Warner, who has now passed for 300 yards in 50 of 113 games (44.2 percent), is the fastest quarterback to reach 50 300-yard games, surpassing Pro Football Hall of Famer DAN MARINO (176 games).
 
(Again we have our “so what?” statistic for the week. How many of those damn games did Warner win?)
 
 
Warner has now passed for 13,255 yards as a Cardinal.  He threw for 14,447 yards with the St. Louis Rams and joins Pro Football Hall of Famer FRAN TARKENTON as the only players to pass for at least 13,000 yards with two different teams.
 
(It’s safe to say those yards with the Rams were mostly wins; just as most of those Cardinal/N.Y. Giants yards were mostly losses. In this bastardized fantasy universe of stat masturbation, it only means Warner, a decent player and man by all accounts, has had a lengthy career filled with some worthy accomplishments.)
 
 
Baltimore safety ED REED had a 52-yard interception-return touchdown against Cincinnati, the 12th return TD of his career.  Reed is now tied with RONDE BARBER, DEVIN HESTER and DARREN SHARPER for the most return touchdowns among active players.
 
(Ed Reed is not just a safety; he is the best safety in football. Although fans in Pittsburgh {Troy Polamalu} may disagree, no one player I’ve seen {including my man ex- Eagle Brian “Wolverine” Dawkins} plays every aspect of the position with as much skill as Reed.
Reed also has wide receiver hands, rarely drops the ball when in his neighborhood, and has only been in the game nine seasons, with just about every one of them at Pro Bowl level or better. If he walked away right now, Reed is about as slam-dunk a first vote Hall of Fame selection as any to come down the pike in years.)
 
 
Dallas tight end JASON WITTEN played in his 100th career game and had five catches for 47 yards.  Witten has 457 career receptions, the second-most all-time by a tight end in his first 100 games.  Pro Football Hall of Famer KELLEN WINSLOW had 497 catches in the first 100 games of his career.
 
(An actual testament to both tight ends, given the caliber of receivers they have had as teammates.)
 
Denver wide receiver EDDIE ROYAL had 10 catches for 90 yards in the Broncos’ 20-17 overtime victory over New England.  Royal, who now has 109 receptions in 20 career games, is the third wide receiver in NFL history to reach 100 catches in 20 or fewer games, joining Arizona’s ANQUAN BOLDIN (16 games) and former New England wide receiver TERRY GLENN (20). 
 
(Nice selection by Denver in drafting Royal - a nifty, shifty receiver who runs all the patterns by the numbers, and is an excellent complement to Marshall in attacking opposing defenses.)
 
Philadelphia rookie wide receiver JEREMY MACLIN had six catches for 142 yards and two touchdowns in the Eagles’ 33-14 win over Tampa Bay.  Maclin recorded the first two TDs of his career on receptions of 51 and 40 yards.  He is the fifth rookie since 1970 to have his first two career receiving touchdowns go for at least 40 yards and occur in the same game.
 
(Now if only Philadelphia had put this kind of effort in finding comparable talent when McNabb was at his peak; I still believe Giants got the best receiver in the draft in Hakeem Nicks, but Maclin’s not bad…)
 
 
Cincinnati running back CEDRIC BENSON rushed for 120 yards in the Bengals’ 17-14 win over Baltimore.  Benson is the first running back since Kansas City’s LARRY JOHNSON (120 yards on December 10, 2006) to rush for 100 yards against the Ravens, ending the NFL’s longest current streak (39 games) without allowing a 100-yard rusher.
 
(Cast off by Chicago, Benson has made the most of his opportunity with Cincinnati, running the rock hard, displacing incumbent Rudi Johnson, and making an early statement for Comeback Player of the Year!)
 
And, as always, once the point has been established - if you throw a seven – you crap out!
 
mike@footballreportersonline.com
 

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

President Obama, welcome to San Francisco

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com



Dear President Obama,

Welcome to San Francisco and the fundraiser at the Westin St. Francis. Congratulations on your Nobel Peace Prize, as well.  Unfortunately, I will not be there to greet you.


President Obama

I write this with a mixture of pain and nervousness. Pain because I don't intend harm to the political campaign all of us have worked to build. Nervousness because I'm not sure the people at the Democratic Party - nor some of my friends in it - will like what I'm about to write, even though it's not personal and my hope is that it, in some small way, helps to get us back on the right track.

I think we've fallen off of it.

President Obama, the problem for me started when as a member of the gathering's "host committee" I was made aware of the "ask" levels for those we wanted to attend: $30,000 per couple, and $1,000 and $500.

At first I was under the hubris-fueled impression that I could get a lot of my friends to pony up those bucks. But the economic something we always talk about - the worst economy since the Great Depression - has hit everyone.

People I'm used to seeing "do well", as they say, are struggling. And while I have more work, I have to work harder to maintain the flow of it. It's hard for everyone.

But what really got me was the memory of how we got to where we are: the millions of ordinary people who gave a few cents here, or a buck there, or $10 over there, and all online.  Remember all of those people who were so jazzed to see you when you first came out for the Boxer function after you annouced you were running for President?

If you need a reminder, here it is:



What happened to our campaign based on them?

Mr. President, I thought we were supposed to transform the Democratic Party into that kind of fundraising organization: the one based on "the little person" or what we call "the common American."

Mr. President, we - not at this point in our history - should forget about them. Not now. Not when so many people are suffering can we afford to go back to the big money, fat cat ways of campaigns past. People - Democrats fighting to make ends meet - will not get it. Republicans that would normally come over to us would be turned off.

Maybe the cost was to scare off the "riff-raff" but Mr. President you've got the Secret Service and people like me. I will personally kick the ass of anyone who tried to harm you in my presence and you can count on that.

Mr. President, the DNC didn't get just how bad California's economy was. We tried to tell them. Maybe now they've got a clue now, but it would be real nice if they would listen to us first before planning these events. To have those levels of "ask", then hear people - friends - react with a mixture of interest and sadness was too much to go through for me. Plus, I've got other spending priorities of late: a Mom in Georgia who needs and gets my help first and foremost.

So Mr. President, I'll be elsewhere Thursday night. I hope you see this. I hope this never happens again.

Blog Action Day - Climate Change: why question it?

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com



Tomorrow is the launch of what for me will be my second "Blog Action Day". Last year the topic was poverty; this year the concern is climate change. But before I get to that, let me explain what "Blog Action Day" itself is, because chances are you've never heard of it.

Blog Action Day is a initiative where one day - tomorrow - is designated for bloggers and vloggers to post on one subject. Last year, that was poverty. This year it's climate change.

As I state in my video above, the major issue I take with opponents of climate change is that I don't understand what's wrong with at least having a "gauge" of how our weather system is changing.

If we have a flu, how do we know that aside from how we feel? We take our temperature. Similarly, we must take a measure of our climate's heat if only to know if it's too great or too little as well as the consequences of both extremes.

To me, it's really that basic. So, on Blog Action Day, I hope those who are against climate change will try and go without taking their own temperature if they're sick.

Rush Limbaugh rejected by NFL; he and Bill O'Reilly don't get it

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com

Rush Limbaugh was dropped from the potential St. Louis Rams NFL ownership group put together by St. Louis Blues owner Dave Cheketts today. As I explained here, Rush being an NFL owner would be "modern slavery":



But it's clear Rush doesn't get how his brand and the NFL's brand don't mix, and Fox News' Bill O'Reilly comes along to paint Rush as the poor victim:
"This (the criticism of Rush for his racially divisive statements) is 1984-type stuff, ladies and gentlemen. Thought police posture.."
And Rush? Limbaugh offered the biggest bunch of hooey I've ever heard from him:
..But I do love you all and I thank you all so much for your support. I want to say that many people have e-mailed me, and they're right about this, that this is not about me. Not just about me, this is not about the NFL, it's not about the St. Louis Rams, it's not about me. This is about the ongoing effort by the left in this country, wherever you find them, in the media, the Democrat Party, or wherever, to destroy conservatism, to prevent the mainstreaming of anyone who is prominent as a conservative.

Rush Limbaugh, now I'm talking to you! If you're smart, you'll listen.

Rush, let me tell ya, it's not for me an objective of "destroying conservatism" at all. I know a lot of conservatives who don't agree with your tactics and words. Moreover, to me you're not a true, intellectual conservative in the fashion of an Irving Kristol or William F. Buckley. You're what I call a "Couch Potato Conservative" who just makes statements to upset people who don't agree with your point of view or who don't look like you and disagree with your view.

You've done well at exciting and energizing your so-called base, but you didn't stop about the limits to your growth. The late economist John Kenneth Galbraith developed a theory you should pay attention to because it applies to you. It's called the "Theory of Countervailing Power."

The idea, first advanced in his famous book "American Capitalism" is simply that groups and unions would rise to counter the political power of business. Galbraith's take - who's a liberal economist by the way - is right on here and applies to you. In this case, you are the business and African Americans, who you've attacked, are represented by the unions and community groups (like the NAACP).

They rose up and attacked your bid for partial ownership of an NFL team, and they succeeded. They were successful, first, because you attacked them and, second, because the way you have conducted yourself is at odds with the NFL brand.

That's something you and Bill O'Reilly just don't understand. The NFL brand represents all of America, not a part of it. Rush, you and Bill O'Reilly have used rhetoric that speaks to part of our country, not the whole.

Rush, I got a press release from Media Matters about your many statements. You've got to see it, if you've not already. On second thought maybe you don't want to. Rush, you've hurt a lot of people, ok.

This is what I was sent by Media Matters, Rush, what their press release reads as "at least 28 examples of Limbaugh making racially charged remarks, including:"

· "We are being told that we have to hope [Obama] succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles ... because his father was black."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200901220002

· "I do believe" Obama is an "angry black guy."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907270023

· "[I]n Obama's America, the white kids now get beat up with the black kids cheering."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200909150017

· "Obama's entire economic program is reparations."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907220040

· Obama is "more African in his roots than he is American" and is "behaving like an African colonial despot."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200906260019

· Obama is "Halfrican-American."

http://mediamatters.org/research/200701240010

· "Obama has disowned his white half ... he's decided he's got to go all in on the black side."

http://mediamatters.org/research/200803210012

· Sotomayor "a reverse racist" appointed by Obama, "the greatest living example of a reverse racist."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200905260035

· Obama "wants us to have the same health care and plan that he had in Kenya" and "wants to be the black FDR."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200908240028

· Latching onto LA Times op-ed, Limbaugh sings "Barack, The Magic Negro."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200703200012

· "God does not have a birth certificate. Neither does Obama"; Obama "has yet to prove he's a citizen."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200906100019


· Limbaugh on Gates controversy: "Here you have a black president trying to destroy a white policeman."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907240015


· Limbaugh suggests Obama would not have acted on Somali pirates if he'd known they were "actually young, black Muslim teenagers."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200904140029

· Limbaugh suggests Democrats, media believe "you can't criticize the little black man-child."

http://mediamatters.org/research/200808200009

* "The government's been taking care of [young blacks] their whole lives."

http://mediamatters.org/research/200808200009

· "The days of [minorities] not having any power are over, and they are angry."

http://mediamatters.org/research/200808200009

* "[M]inorities never do anything for which they have to apologize."

http://mediamatters.org/research/200808200009


· Limbaugh: "The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well."

http://mediamatters.org/research/200808200009

· Limbaugh says "NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips."

http://mediamatters.org/research/200808200009

* Limbaugh declares basketball "the favorite sport of gangs."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910070023


* Limbaugh invented "racial component" to Hackett's decision to withdraw from Ohio primary race.

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200602160001

* Limbaugh on Survivor series: "African-American tribe" worst swimmers, Hispanics "will do things other people won't do."

http://mediamatters.org/research/200609300001

* Limbaugh suggested Colin Powell only supported Obama because of race.

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200905180025


* Limbaugh: Gates is an "angry racist."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907270021

* Limbaugh called illegal immigrants an "invasive species."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907270021

* Limbaugh repeatedly calls Native Americans "Injuns."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200508180006

* Limbaugh says Democrats' interest in Darfur is securing black "voting bloc.”

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200708230008


* Limbaugh says that if "feminazis" had remembered to oppose "affirmative action for black guys ... they wouldn't face the situation they face today."

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200805210009

Rush both you and Bill O'Reilly don't get that these comments, taken as a collective, show a pattern of dislike and boarderline hatred for people of color. You've made a $400 million killing from this practice, but where you went wrong is in assuming it would get you in the NFL's club of owners.

The NFL has no interest in wrecking its brand with your approach; Dallas Maverick's owner Mark Cuban's right on here.

Think about it, Rush.

Let's say you were part of the St. Louis group and you made some inflammatory statement. You'd give NFL public relations a total nightmare of a job trying to explain away what you said, not to mention the staff of the Rams.

I can't believe you'd be so selfish as to put your narrow interests ahead of so many innocent people. But you tried to, and now, thank God, it's over.

I hope you've learned a lesson.

Tom Hayes: Do we have a right to truth?

The 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which we often describe as the right of the "Freedom of Speech" which also prohibits interference in religion or the media is being abused in pursuit of corporate profits. Remember how the Bill of Rights starts?
We the people...Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Sounds good, right? We can't know exactly what the founding fathers had in mind with the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, but we do know that misinformation distorts debates and delays progress. I've come across a story that explains a lot of the shameless prevarication we've seen from the Fox network over the past 6 years or so.

In brief, back in February 2003 a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States.

"The court implied there was no restriction against distorting the truth. Technically, there was no violation of the news distortion because the FCC’s policy of news distortion does not have the weight of the law..."
Never, ever doubt that a commercial media outlet is driven by profit.

In Florida, the Court held that a threat by Jane Akre (part of a Fox “Investigators” team at WTVT in Tampa Bay) to report the station’s actions to the FCC did not deserve protection under Florida’s whistle blower statute, because Florida’s whistle blower law states that an employer must violate an adopted “law, rule, or regulation."

The decision reversed an earlier judgment against Fox.

We can't know what the founding fathers had in mind when they drafted the Bill of Rights but it seems unlikely that their intent was to protect the right to profit from untruths. They went so far as to include the oft-overlooked 9th Amendment:
Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Of course, that raises the sticky question, "Do we have a right to the truth?" Apparently the Court in Florida feels Murdoch's right to profit from capitalism as he operates the Fox network is more fundamental - the Florida appeals court found in favor of corporate bottom lines even at the expense of accurate information. It might be worth exploring how they feel about "creative accounting." After all, they found that profit trumps truth.

Read more about this dangerous and disgraceful interpretation; if you share my indignation, spread the word.


Thomas Hayes is a political analyst, journalist, and entrepreneur who contributes regularly to a host of web sites on topics including economics, politics, culture, and community.
Share/Bookmark




Rush Limbaugh did not make "James Earl Ray" statement

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com

While I may dislike Rush Limbaugh's takes on African Americans it does not mean I will not defend him if he's falsely accused of making a statement. I will defend Rush Limbaugh.

In this case, there's a quote that has flown around the Internet almost unchecked and found its way into a famous "Top 10 racist quotes" list that has been used by everyone from myself to some cable television news outlets.

It's this:

“You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed."

Well, it turns out this is one statement Rush Limbaugh never said. It's hard to find but one really good blog item on this, and that's by a blogger named Samurai at the blog Smash Mouth Politics in 2005. He did a time-consuming research job and attributed the quote to a person named "Cobra". Samurai wrote:

First, the quote and the date that it was supposedly made by Rush: “You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed. [4/23/98]” Rush never said it. It was made up back in about 2005 and this article proves it.

I am no computer research guru, but I was able to track down enough to prove that this quote first arose back in the fall of 2005, and there is no evidence of the quote before that date. Bottom line, it is inconceivable that such a quote was made by Rush Limbaugh back in 1998 and then never got any attention on the internet or elsewhere until 2005.

...Evidently, “Cobra” was still making this exact same claim in 2006 ON A STILL DIFFERENT blog site, when he was contemporaneously busted for making this s-- all up!

But even with the great research by Smash Mouth Politics, the quote was still passed around and grew new legs with Rush's interest in an NFL franchise, the St. Louis Rams. But the bottom line is it's wrong and Rush himself has taken action to address the matter.

But even with his work, there's no definitive article or post entitled "Rush Limbaugh did not make "James Earl Ray" statement" until now.

That does not change my view of Rush with respect to the NFL. I feel that given the overall weight of his statements regarding blacks, for him to own a team even part of it would be modern slavery. That's just my view. As I said in my video here -



- Rush can change this just by being a lot less angry toward African Americans. At least that's the way he sounds to me, and I've listened to him many times.

NY Giants' Pierce blasts Oakland Raiders on radio after victory

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com

Talk about adding insult to injury, NFL (please keep Rush Limbaugh out) and New York Giants Linebacker Antonio Pierce did just that to the Oakland Raiders after his team beat the Raiders 44 to 7 on Sunday. On Sirius talk radio Tuesday with Alex Marvez and Marty Schottenheimer, Antonio Pierce said:

"I do not like knocking teams," ..."But right now, they're struggling. We're playing that game the other day and, honestly, it felt like a scrimmage, like a practice. It felt like we were going against our offense [in a controlled setting] as far as the tempo.

"There was no vibe of trying or effort from the Raiders at all from a defensive standpoint against their offense. We're getting three-and-outs. You don't hear nobody [saying], 'Hey, let's go!' trying to pick the guys up, rallying them, getting guys fired up. There was nothing. It was quiet. A guy gets sacked or somebody gets beat, they just get up. It's not like there's yelling or no kind of [emotion] about the way they were playing.

"It was shocking to be out there in that game and get that kind of feeling."

..."It's sad because I grew up a Raiders fan," Pierce said. "That organization right now, they need some guidance. They need somebody to pick them up."

If that's not the kind of comment that leads to changes at the Oakland Raiders, I don't know what will do it. The team's not well-coached, but to read that it's not even motivated to play is shocking and this comes from within the league.

NY Giants' Pierce insults Oakland Raiders on radio after victory

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com

Talk about adding insult to injury, NFL (please keep Rush Limbaugh out) and New York Giants Linebacker Antonio Pierce did just that to the Oakland Raiders after his team beat the Raiders 44 to 7 on Sunday. On Sirius talk radio Tuesday with Alex Marvez and Marty Schottenheimer, Antonio Pierce said:

"I do not like knocking teams," ..."But right now, they're struggling. We're playing that game the other day and, honestly, it felt like a scrimmage, like a practice. It felt like we were going against our offense [in a controlled setting] as far as the tempo.

"There was no vibe of trying or effort from the Raiders at all from a defensive standpoint against their offense. We're getting three-and-outs. You don't hear nobody [saying], 'Hey, let's go!' trying to pick the guys up, rallying them, getting guys fired up. There was nothing. It was quiet. A guy gets sacked or somebody gets beat, they just get up. It's not like there's yelling or no kind of [emotion] about the way they were playing.

"It was shocking to be out there in that game and get that kind of feeling."

..."It's sad because I grew up a Raiders fan," Pierce said. "That organization right now, they need some guidance. They need somebody to pick them up."

If that's not the kind of comment that leads to changes at the Oakland Raiders, I don't know what will do it. The team's not well-coached, but to read that it's not even motivated to play is shocking and this comes from within the league.

Rush Limbaugh created Glen Beck, wants NFL team

More at Zennie62.com | Follow me on Twitter! | Get my widget! | Visit YouTube | Visit UShow.com

Rush Limbaugh, who I said if the NFL allowed to own even part of an NFL team would be "Modern Slavery" -

here



- is taking credit for the rise of Glen Beck (who's also known for divisive hate talk) and "conservative media" as he calls it. According to Think Progress, Rush Limbaugh says:

Look, in 1988, I’m the only national conservative voice. Now look at conservative media. Look what I have spawned. Glenn Beck to me is right on daddy-o. Glenn Beck is a result of my success.

And this man thinks the NFL's going to allow him to be a part of the owner's club? No way. By comparing himself to Glen Beck, Rush just officially mugged his own chances to be in the NFL.

But thanks for the red meat, Rush.